Disputes of Self-reported Chronic Disease over Time: The Role of Race, Ethnicity, Nativity, and Language of Interview

Ana Quinones, Amanuel Melekin, Christine T. Cigolle, Corey Nagel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Respondents in longitudinal health interview surveys may inconsistently report their chronic diseases across interview waves. Racial/ethnic minority adults have an increased burden of chronic diseases and may dispute chronic disease reports more frequently. Objective: We evaluated the longitudinal association between race/ethnicity, nativity, and language of interview with disputing previously reported chronic diseases. Methods: We performed secondary data analysis of nationally representative longitudinal data (Health and Retirement Study, 1998-2010) of adults 51 years or older (n=23,593). We estimated multilevel mixed-effects logistic models of disputes of previously reported chronic disease (hypertension, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, arthritis). Results: Approximately 22% of Health and Retirement Study respondents disputed prior chronic disease self-reports across the entire study period; 21% of non-Latino white, 20.5% of non-Latino black, and 28% of Latino respondents disputed. In subgroup comparisons of model-predicted odds using postestimation commands, Latinos interviewed in Spanish have 34% greater odds of disputing compared with non-Latino whites interviewed in English and 35% greater odds of dispute relative to non-Latino blacks interviewed in English. Conclusions: The odds of disputing a prior chronic disease report were substantially higher for Latinos who were interviewed in Spanish compared with non-Latino white or black counterparts interviewed in English, even after accounting for other sociodemographic factors, cognitive declines, and time-in-sample considerations. Our findings point toward leveraging of multiple sources of data to triangulate information on chronic disease status as well as investigating potential mechanisms underlying the higher probability of dispute among Spanish-speaking Latino respondents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical care
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dissent and Disputes
Chronic Disease
Language
Interviews
Hispanic Americans
Retirement
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health
Health Surveys
Self Report
Lung Diseases
Arthritis
Heart Diseases
Logistic Models
Stroke
Odds Ratio
Hypertension
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • chronic disease
  • language of interview
  • longitudinal analysis
  • race/ethnicity
  • self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Disputes of Self-reported Chronic Disease over Time : The Role of Race, Ethnicity, Nativity, and Language of Interview. / Quinones, Ana; Melekin, Amanuel; Cigolle, Christine T.; Nagel, Corey.

In: Medical care, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65804ee71bb04f228f0ae26343ff84ff,
title = "Disputes of Self-reported Chronic Disease over Time: The Role of Race, Ethnicity, Nativity, and Language of Interview",
abstract = "Background: Respondents in longitudinal health interview surveys may inconsistently report their chronic diseases across interview waves. Racial/ethnic minority adults have an increased burden of chronic diseases and may dispute chronic disease reports more frequently. Objective: We evaluated the longitudinal association between race/ethnicity, nativity, and language of interview with disputing previously reported chronic diseases. Methods: We performed secondary data analysis of nationally representative longitudinal data (Health and Retirement Study, 1998-2010) of adults 51 years or older (n=23,593). We estimated multilevel mixed-effects logistic models of disputes of previously reported chronic disease (hypertension, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, arthritis). Results: Approximately 22{\%} of Health and Retirement Study respondents disputed prior chronic disease self-reports across the entire study period; 21{\%} of non-Latino white, 20.5{\%} of non-Latino black, and 28{\%} of Latino respondents disputed. In subgroup comparisons of model-predicted odds using postestimation commands, Latinos interviewed in Spanish have 34{\%} greater odds of disputing compared with non-Latino whites interviewed in English and 35{\%} greater odds of dispute relative to non-Latino blacks interviewed in English. Conclusions: The odds of disputing a prior chronic disease report were substantially higher for Latinos who were interviewed in Spanish compared with non-Latino white or black counterparts interviewed in English, even after accounting for other sociodemographic factors, cognitive declines, and time-in-sample considerations. Our findings point toward leveraging of multiple sources of data to triangulate information on chronic disease status as well as investigating potential mechanisms underlying the higher probability of dispute among Spanish-speaking Latino respondents.",
keywords = "chronic disease, language of interview, longitudinal analysis, race/ethnicity, self-report",
author = "Ana Quinones and Amanuel Melekin and Cigolle, {Christine T.} and Corey Nagel",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0000000000001148",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disputes of Self-reported Chronic Disease over Time

T2 - The Role of Race, Ethnicity, Nativity, and Language of Interview

AU - Quinones, Ana

AU - Melekin, Amanuel

AU - Cigolle, Christine T.

AU - Nagel, Corey

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Respondents in longitudinal health interview surveys may inconsistently report their chronic diseases across interview waves. Racial/ethnic minority adults have an increased burden of chronic diseases and may dispute chronic disease reports more frequently. Objective: We evaluated the longitudinal association between race/ethnicity, nativity, and language of interview with disputing previously reported chronic diseases. Methods: We performed secondary data analysis of nationally representative longitudinal data (Health and Retirement Study, 1998-2010) of adults 51 years or older (n=23,593). We estimated multilevel mixed-effects logistic models of disputes of previously reported chronic disease (hypertension, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, arthritis). Results: Approximately 22% of Health and Retirement Study respondents disputed prior chronic disease self-reports across the entire study period; 21% of non-Latino white, 20.5% of non-Latino black, and 28% of Latino respondents disputed. In subgroup comparisons of model-predicted odds using postestimation commands, Latinos interviewed in Spanish have 34% greater odds of disputing compared with non-Latino whites interviewed in English and 35% greater odds of dispute relative to non-Latino blacks interviewed in English. Conclusions: The odds of disputing a prior chronic disease report were substantially higher for Latinos who were interviewed in Spanish compared with non-Latino white or black counterparts interviewed in English, even after accounting for other sociodemographic factors, cognitive declines, and time-in-sample considerations. Our findings point toward leveraging of multiple sources of data to triangulate information on chronic disease status as well as investigating potential mechanisms underlying the higher probability of dispute among Spanish-speaking Latino respondents.

AB - Background: Respondents in longitudinal health interview surveys may inconsistently report their chronic diseases across interview waves. Racial/ethnic minority adults have an increased burden of chronic diseases and may dispute chronic disease reports more frequently. Objective: We evaluated the longitudinal association between race/ethnicity, nativity, and language of interview with disputing previously reported chronic diseases. Methods: We performed secondary data analysis of nationally representative longitudinal data (Health and Retirement Study, 1998-2010) of adults 51 years or older (n=23,593). We estimated multilevel mixed-effects logistic models of disputes of previously reported chronic disease (hypertension, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, arthritis). Results: Approximately 22% of Health and Retirement Study respondents disputed prior chronic disease self-reports across the entire study period; 21% of non-Latino white, 20.5% of non-Latino black, and 28% of Latino respondents disputed. In subgroup comparisons of model-predicted odds using postestimation commands, Latinos interviewed in Spanish have 34% greater odds of disputing compared with non-Latino whites interviewed in English and 35% greater odds of dispute relative to non-Latino blacks interviewed in English. Conclusions: The odds of disputing a prior chronic disease report were substantially higher for Latinos who were interviewed in Spanish compared with non-Latino white or black counterparts interviewed in English, even after accounting for other sociodemographic factors, cognitive declines, and time-in-sample considerations. Our findings point toward leveraging of multiple sources of data to triangulate information on chronic disease status as well as investigating potential mechanisms underlying the higher probability of dispute among Spanish-speaking Latino respondents.

KW - chronic disease

KW - language of interview

KW - longitudinal analysis

KW - race/ethnicity

KW - self-report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067368454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067368454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001148

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001148

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067368454

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

ER -