Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Teaching Program for Residents

Geoffrey H. Gordon, Susan Tolle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ideally, physicians and patients should discuss patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment before the onset of cognitive impairment or a life-threatening illness; however, these conversations often do not occur. We developed an educational program in which residents practiced discussing advance directives with volunteer simulated outpatients and then received feedback from the patient, an observing resident, and a faculty member. Residents found the training sessions to be realistic, relevant, and useful. Resident self-ratings improved significantly on eight items representing knowledge, skills, and attitudes about discussing advance directives with patients. Resident learning occurred in four major areas: technical knowledge about advance directives; introducing the topic to patients; giving patients information; and eliciting patients’ values and feelings. We conclude that residents need and want training in this area and that simulated patients act as a catalyst for their learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-570
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume151
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Teaching
Advance Directives
Therapeutics
Learning
Patient Preference
Volunteers
Emotions
Outpatients
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment : A Teaching Program for Residents. / Gordon, Geoffrey H.; Tolle, Susan.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 151, No. 3, 1991, p. 567-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1558c8930cc3452bb9e6987c50842d8b,
title = "Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Teaching Program for Residents",
abstract = "Ideally, physicians and patients should discuss patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment before the onset of cognitive impairment or a life-threatening illness; however, these conversations often do not occur. We developed an educational program in which residents practiced discussing advance directives with volunteer simulated outpatients and then received feedback from the patient, an observing resident, and a faculty member. Residents found the training sessions to be realistic, relevant, and useful. Resident self-ratings improved significantly on eight items representing knowledge, skills, and attitudes about discussing advance directives with patients. Resident learning occurred in four major areas: technical knowledge about advance directives; introducing the topic to patients; giving patients information; and eliciting patients’ values and feelings. We conclude that residents need and want training in this area and that simulated patients act as a catalyst for their learning.",
author = "Gordon, {Geoffrey H.} and Susan Tolle",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1001/archinte.1991.00400030105019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "567--570",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment

T2 - A Teaching Program for Residents

AU - Gordon, Geoffrey H.

AU - Tolle, Susan

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Ideally, physicians and patients should discuss patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment before the onset of cognitive impairment or a life-threatening illness; however, these conversations often do not occur. We developed an educational program in which residents practiced discussing advance directives with volunteer simulated outpatients and then received feedback from the patient, an observing resident, and a faculty member. Residents found the training sessions to be realistic, relevant, and useful. Resident self-ratings improved significantly on eight items representing knowledge, skills, and attitudes about discussing advance directives with patients. Resident learning occurred in four major areas: technical knowledge about advance directives; introducing the topic to patients; giving patients information; and eliciting patients’ values and feelings. We conclude that residents need and want training in this area and that simulated patients act as a catalyst for their learning.

AB - Ideally, physicians and patients should discuss patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment before the onset of cognitive impairment or a life-threatening illness; however, these conversations often do not occur. We developed an educational program in which residents practiced discussing advance directives with volunteer simulated outpatients and then received feedback from the patient, an observing resident, and a faculty member. Residents found the training sessions to be realistic, relevant, and useful. Resident self-ratings improved significantly on eight items representing knowledge, skills, and attitudes about discussing advance directives with patients. Resident learning occurred in four major areas: technical knowledge about advance directives; introducing the topic to patients; giving patients information; and eliciting patients’ values and feelings. We conclude that residents need and want training in this area and that simulated patients act as a catalyst for their learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025980920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025980920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400030105019

DO - 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400030105019

M3 - Article

C2 - 2001139

AN - SCOPUS:0025980920

VL - 151

SP - 567

EP - 570

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 3

ER -