Dilemmas encountered by hospice workers when patients wish to hasten death

Theresa A. Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Kathryn A. Smith, Lisa D. Clark, Ann Jackson, Linda Ganzini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations


In 1997, Oregon enacted the Oregon Death With Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide. This article reports on a qualitative study of the ethical and clinical dilemmas experienced by hospice nurses and social workers when they encounter patients who wish to hasten death through physician-assisted suicide. The biggest dilemma arises from the conflict between two important hospice values: honoring patient autonomy versus promoting a death experience in which personal and spiritual transformation are possible. Hospice professionals report conflict between their advocacy for patients and for the family members who sometimes oppose physician-assisted suicide. Conversely, when patients choose to hasten death by voluntarily refusing all food and fluids, many of these dilemmas dissipate. As more patients request control of the circumstances of their deaths, a better understanding of the complex issues regarding hastening death is needed for patients, families, and the health professionals who provide care during this difficult transition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-209
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2006
Externally publishedYes


  • Hospice workers
  • Oregon Death With Dignity Act
  • Physician-assisted suicide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Community and Home Care
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing


Dive into the research topics of 'Dilemmas encountered by hospice workers when patients wish to hasten death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this