Dilemmas encountered by hospice workers when patients wish to hasten death

Theresa A. Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Kathryn A. Smith, Lisa D. Clark, Ann Jackson, Linda Ganzini

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    21 Scopus citations


    In 1997, Oregon enacted the Oregon Death With Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide. This article reports on a qualitative study of the ethical and clinical dilemmas experienced by hospice nurses and social workers when they encounter patients who wish to hasten death through physician-assisted suicide. The biggest dilemma arises from the conflict between two important hospice values: honoring patient autonomy versus promoting a death experience in which personal and spiritual transformation are possible. Hospice professionals report conflict between their advocacy for patients and for the family members who sometimes oppose physician-assisted suicide. Conversely, when patients choose to hasten death by voluntarily refusing all food and fluids, many of these dilemmas dissipate. As more patients request control of the circumstances of their deaths, a better understanding of the complex issues regarding hastening death is needed for patients, families, and the health professionals who provide care during this difficult transition.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)200-209
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2006


    • Hospice workers
    • Oregon Death With Dignity Act
    • Physician-assisted suicide

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Community and Home Care
    • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dilemmas encountered by hospice workers when patients wish to hasten death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this