Differences in health and health behaviors between state employees and other employed adults in Oregon, 2007

Ying Han, Daniel Morris, Stacey Schubert, Duyen Ngo, Jane M. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Worksite health promotion and interventions have gained popularity among state agencies. We studied the health behaviors and health characteristics of adults employed in state agencies in Oregon and compared those state employees with the statewide population of employed, insured adults. Methods We used data from the Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and a modified BRFSS survey administered to state employees. State employees were compared with employed, insured BRFSS respondents in total and then separately for men and women. Results The prevalence of healthy weight was lower among state employees compared with the statewide population of employed, insured adults (29% vs 35%), and the prevalence of obesity was higher (35% vs 26%). State employees were also less likely to meet physical activity recommendations (44% vs 56%). Diabetes prevalence was higher among state employees (7% vs 5%), and self-reported excellent or very good health status was lower (54% vs 64%). Conclusions State employees differ from the statewide population of employed, insured adults on a number of health behaviors and conditions. These differences suggest obesity prevention and diabetes control as priority areas for state agency worksite interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberA106
JournalPreventing chronic disease
Volume7
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Health Behavior
Workplace
Health
Obesity
Population
Health Promotion
Health Status
Exercise
Weights and Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Differences in health and health behaviors between state employees and other employed adults in Oregon, 2007. / Han, Ying; Morris, Daniel; Schubert, Stacey; Ngo, Duyen; Moore, Jane M.

In: Preventing chronic disease, Vol. 7, No. 5, A106, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{507a215421554ab6ad74b5f5dcf971e2,
title = "Differences in health and health behaviors between state employees and other employed adults in Oregon, 2007",
abstract = "Introduction Worksite health promotion and interventions have gained popularity among state agencies. We studied the health behaviors and health characteristics of adults employed in state agencies in Oregon and compared those state employees with the statewide population of employed, insured adults. Methods We used data from the Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and a modified BRFSS survey administered to state employees. State employees were compared with employed, insured BRFSS respondents in total and then separately for men and women. Results The prevalence of healthy weight was lower among state employees compared with the statewide population of employed, insured adults (29{\%} vs 35{\%}), and the prevalence of obesity was higher (35{\%} vs 26{\%}). State employees were also less likely to meet physical activity recommendations (44{\%} vs 56{\%}). Diabetes prevalence was higher among state employees (7{\%} vs 5{\%}), and self-reported excellent or very good health status was lower (54{\%} vs 64{\%}). Conclusions State employees differ from the statewide population of employed, insured adults on a number of health behaviors and conditions. These differences suggest obesity prevention and diabetes control as priority areas for state agency worksite interventions.",
author = "Ying Han and Daniel Morris and Stacey Schubert and Duyen Ngo and Moore, {Jane M.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Preventing chronic disease",
issn = "1545-1151",
publisher = "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in health and health behaviors between state employees and other employed adults in Oregon, 2007

AU - Han, Ying

AU - Morris, Daniel

AU - Schubert, Stacey

AU - Ngo, Duyen

AU - Moore, Jane M.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Introduction Worksite health promotion and interventions have gained popularity among state agencies. We studied the health behaviors and health characteristics of adults employed in state agencies in Oregon and compared those state employees with the statewide population of employed, insured adults. Methods We used data from the Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and a modified BRFSS survey administered to state employees. State employees were compared with employed, insured BRFSS respondents in total and then separately for men and women. Results The prevalence of healthy weight was lower among state employees compared with the statewide population of employed, insured adults (29% vs 35%), and the prevalence of obesity was higher (35% vs 26%). State employees were also less likely to meet physical activity recommendations (44% vs 56%). Diabetes prevalence was higher among state employees (7% vs 5%), and self-reported excellent or very good health status was lower (54% vs 64%). Conclusions State employees differ from the statewide population of employed, insured adults on a number of health behaviors and conditions. These differences suggest obesity prevention and diabetes control as priority areas for state agency worksite interventions.

AB - Introduction Worksite health promotion and interventions have gained popularity among state agencies. We studied the health behaviors and health characteristics of adults employed in state agencies in Oregon and compared those state employees with the statewide population of employed, insured adults. Methods We used data from the Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and a modified BRFSS survey administered to state employees. State employees were compared with employed, insured BRFSS respondents in total and then separately for men and women. Results The prevalence of healthy weight was lower among state employees compared with the statewide population of employed, insured adults (29% vs 35%), and the prevalence of obesity was higher (35% vs 26%). State employees were also less likely to meet physical activity recommendations (44% vs 56%). Diabetes prevalence was higher among state employees (7% vs 5%), and self-reported excellent or very good health status was lower (54% vs 64%). Conclusions State employees differ from the statewide population of employed, insured adults on a number of health behaviors and conditions. These differences suggest obesity prevention and diabetes control as priority areas for state agency worksite interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952112718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952112718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20712933

AN - SCOPUS:79952112718

VL - 7

JO - Preventing chronic disease

JF - Preventing chronic disease

SN - 1545-1151

IS - 5

M1 - A106

ER -