Differences in health and health behaviors between state employees and other employed adults in Oregon, 2007

Ying Han, Daniel S. Morris, Stacey Schubert, Duyen Ngo, Jane M. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Worksite health promotion and interventions have gained popularity among state agencies. We studied the health behaviors and health characteristics of adults employed in state agencies in Oregon and compared those state employees with the statewide population of employed, insured adults. Methods We used data from the Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and a modified BRFSS survey administered to state employees. State employees were compared with employed, insured BRFSS respondents in total and then separately for men and women. Results The prevalence of healthy weight was lower among state employees compared with the statewide population of employed, insured adults (29% vs 35%), and the prevalence of obesity was higher (35% vs 26%). State employees were also less likely to meet physical activity recommendations (44% vs 56%). Diabetes prevalence was higher among state employees (7% vs 5%), and self-reported excellent or very good health status was lower (54% vs 64%). Conclusions State employees differ from the statewide population of employed, insured adults on a number of health behaviors and conditions. These differences suggest obesity prevention and diabetes control as priority areas for state agency worksite interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberA106
JournalPreventing Chronic Disease
Volume7
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in health and health behaviors between state employees and other employed adults in Oregon, 2007'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this