TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic performance of receptor-specific surgical specimen staining correlates with receptor expression level
AU - Schaefer, Jasmin M.
AU - Barth, Connor W.
AU - Davis, Scott C.
AU - Gibbs, Summer L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Kimberley Samkoe, Dr. Margaret Folaron, and Mr. Rendy Strawbridge for insightful discussions. This work was funded by the National Cancer Institute (R01CA188491).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Intraoperative margin assessment is imperative to cancer cure but is a continued challenge to successful surgery. Breast conserving surgery is a relevant example, where a cosmetically improved outcome is gained over mastectomy, but re-excision is required in >25 % of cases due to positive or closely involved margins. Clinical translation of margin assessment modalities that must directly contact the patient or required administered contrast agents are time consuming and costly to move from bench to bedside. Tumor resections provide a unique surgical opportunity to deploy margin assessment technologies including contrast agents on the resected tissues, substantially shortening the path to the clinic. However, staining of resected tissues is plagued by nonspecific uptake. A ratiometric imaging approach where matched targeted and untargeted probes are used for staining has demonstrated substantially improved biomarker quantification over staining with conventional targeted contrast agents alone. Our group has developed an antibody-based ratiometric imaging technology using fluorescently labeled, spectrally distinct targeted and untargeted antibody probes termed dual-stain difference specimen imaging (DDSI). Herein, the targeted biomarker expression level and pattern are evaluated for their effects on DDSI diagnostic potential. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression level was correlated to DDSI diagnostic potential, which was found to be robust to spatial pattern expression variation. These results highlight the utility of DDSI for accurate margin assessment of freshly resected tumor specimens.
AB - Intraoperative margin assessment is imperative to cancer cure but is a continued challenge to successful surgery. Breast conserving surgery is a relevant example, where a cosmetically improved outcome is gained over mastectomy, but re-excision is required in >25 % of cases due to positive or closely involved margins. Clinical translation of margin assessment modalities that must directly contact the patient or required administered contrast agents are time consuming and costly to move from bench to bedside. Tumor resections provide a unique surgical opportunity to deploy margin assessment technologies including contrast agents on the resected tissues, substantially shortening the path to the clinic. However, staining of resected tissues is plagued by nonspecific uptake. A ratiometric imaging approach where matched targeted and untargeted probes are used for staining has demonstrated substantially improved biomarker quantification over staining with conventional targeted contrast agents alone. Our group has developed an antibody-based ratiometric imaging technology using fluorescently labeled, spectrally distinct targeted and untargeted antibody probes termed dual-stain difference specimen imaging (DDSI). Herein, the targeted biomarker expression level and pattern are evaluated for their effects on DDSI diagnostic potential. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression level was correlated to DDSI diagnostic potential, which was found to be robust to spatial pattern expression variation. These results highlight the utility of DDSI for accurate margin assessment of freshly resected tumor specimens.
KW - breast conserving surgery
KW - dual-stain difference specimen imaging
KW - image-guided surgery
KW - paired agent imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061254136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061254136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/1.JBO.24.2.026002
DO - 10.1117/1.JBO.24.2.026002
M3 - Article
C2 - 30737910
AN - SCOPUS:85061254136
SN - 1083-3668
VL - 24
JO - Journal of Biomedical Optics
JF - Journal of Biomedical Optics
IS - 2
M1 - 026002
ER -