Abstract
The role of thermography for diagnosing lumbar radiculopathy was evaluated by literature review and metaanalysis. From 81 relevant citations, 28 studies could be analyzed for diagnostic-accuracy data (sensitivity and specificity) and method. Diagnostic-accuracy data varied significantly between studies; therefore meaningful pooled summary statistics could not be reported. Twenty- seven studies had major methodologic flaws including biased test interpretations, faulty cohort assembly, poor clinical descriptions, and small sample size. The only study of reasonably high quality found no discriminant value for liquid-crystal thermography. The role of thermography remains unclear. Rigorous clinical research is required to establish its diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Thermography cannot be recommended currently for routine clinical use in evaluating low-back pain.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 623-628 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Spine |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1991 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Lumbar radiculopathy
- Meta-analysis
- Sciatica
- Technology assessment
- Thermography
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Clinical Neurology