Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients

Adam L. Brown, N. Clay Mann, Mohamud Ramzan Daya, Robert Goldberg, Hendrika Meischke, Judy Taylor, Kevin Smith, Stavroula Osganian, Lawton Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background - Empirical evidence suggests that people value emergency medical services (EMS) but that they may not use the service when experiencing chest pain. This study evaluates this phenomenon and the factors associated with the failure to use EMS during a potential cardiac event. Methods and Results - Baseline data were gathered from a randomized, controlled community trial (REACT) that was conducted in 20 US communities. A random-digit-dial survey documented bystander intentions to use EMS for cardiac symptoms in each community. An emergency department surveillance system documented the mode of transport among chest pain patients in each community and collected ancillary data, including situational factors surrounding the chest pain event. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to use EMS. A total of 962 community members responded to the phone survey, and data were collected on 875 chest pain emergency department arrivals. The mean proportion of community members intending to use EMS during a witnessed cardiac event was 89%; the mean proportion of patients observed using the service was 23%, with significant geographic differences (range, 10% to 48% use). After controlling for covariates, non-EMS users were more likely to try antacids/aspirin and call a doctor and were less likely to subscribe to (or participate in) an EMS prepayment plan. Conclusions - The results of this study indicate that indecision, self-treatment, physician contact, and financial concerns may undermine a chest pain patient's intention to use EMS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-178
Number of pages6
JournalCirculation
Volume102
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jul 11 2000

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Chest Pain
Demography
Hospital Emergency Service
Antacids
Aspirin
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Physicians

Keywords

  • Coronary disease
  • Epidemiology
  • Public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Brown, A. L., Mann, N. C., Daya, M. R., Goldberg, R., Meischke, H., Taylor, J., ... Cooper, L. (2000). Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Circulation, 102(2), 173-178.

Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. / Brown, Adam L.; Mann, N. Clay; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan; Goldberg, Robert; Meischke, Hendrika; Taylor, Judy; Smith, Kevin; Osganian, Stavroula; Cooper, Lawton.

In: Circulation, Vol. 102, No. 2, 11.07.2000, p. 173-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, AL, Mann, NC, Daya, MR, Goldberg, R, Meischke, H, Taylor, J, Smith, K, Osganian, S & Cooper, L 2000, 'Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients', Circulation, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 173-178.
Brown, Adam L. ; Mann, N. Clay ; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan ; Goldberg, Robert ; Meischke, Hendrika ; Taylor, Judy ; Smith, Kevin ; Osganian, Stavroula ; Cooper, Lawton. / Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. In: Circulation. 2000 ; Vol. 102, No. 2. pp. 173-178.
@article{484754c43bad4cc9bf8a795d6246a0f6,
title = "Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients",
abstract = "Background - Empirical evidence suggests that people value emergency medical services (EMS) but that they may not use the service when experiencing chest pain. This study evaluates this phenomenon and the factors associated with the failure to use EMS during a potential cardiac event. Methods and Results - Baseline data were gathered from a randomized, controlled community trial (REACT) that was conducted in 20 US communities. A random-digit-dial survey documented bystander intentions to use EMS for cardiac symptoms in each community. An emergency department surveillance system documented the mode of transport among chest pain patients in each community and collected ancillary data, including situational factors surrounding the chest pain event. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to use EMS. A total of 962 community members responded to the phone survey, and data were collected on 875 chest pain emergency department arrivals. The mean proportion of community members intending to use EMS during a witnessed cardiac event was 89{\%}; the mean proportion of patients observed using the service was 23{\%}, with significant geographic differences (range, 10{\%} to 48{\%} use). After controlling for covariates, non-EMS users were more likely to try antacids/aspirin and call a doctor and were less likely to subscribe to (or participate in) an EMS prepayment plan. Conclusions - The results of this study indicate that indecision, self-treatment, physician contact, and financial concerns may undermine a chest pain patient's intention to use EMS.",
keywords = "Coronary disease, Epidemiology, Public policy",
author = "Brown, {Adam L.} and Mann, {N. Clay} and Daya, {Mohamud Ramzan} and Robert Goldberg and Hendrika Meischke and Judy Taylor and Kevin Smith and Stavroula Osganian and Lawton Cooper",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
day = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "173--178",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients

AU - Brown, Adam L.

AU - Mann, N. Clay

AU - Daya, Mohamud Ramzan

AU - Goldberg, Robert

AU - Meischke, Hendrika

AU - Taylor, Judy

AU - Smith, Kevin

AU - Osganian, Stavroula

AU - Cooper, Lawton

PY - 2000/7/11

Y1 - 2000/7/11

N2 - Background - Empirical evidence suggests that people value emergency medical services (EMS) but that they may not use the service when experiencing chest pain. This study evaluates this phenomenon and the factors associated with the failure to use EMS during a potential cardiac event. Methods and Results - Baseline data were gathered from a randomized, controlled community trial (REACT) that was conducted in 20 US communities. A random-digit-dial survey documented bystander intentions to use EMS for cardiac symptoms in each community. An emergency department surveillance system documented the mode of transport among chest pain patients in each community and collected ancillary data, including situational factors surrounding the chest pain event. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to use EMS. A total of 962 community members responded to the phone survey, and data were collected on 875 chest pain emergency department arrivals. The mean proportion of community members intending to use EMS during a witnessed cardiac event was 89%; the mean proportion of patients observed using the service was 23%, with significant geographic differences (range, 10% to 48% use). After controlling for covariates, non-EMS users were more likely to try antacids/aspirin and call a doctor and were less likely to subscribe to (or participate in) an EMS prepayment plan. Conclusions - The results of this study indicate that indecision, self-treatment, physician contact, and financial concerns may undermine a chest pain patient's intention to use EMS.

AB - Background - Empirical evidence suggests that people value emergency medical services (EMS) but that they may not use the service when experiencing chest pain. This study evaluates this phenomenon and the factors associated with the failure to use EMS during a potential cardiac event. Methods and Results - Baseline data were gathered from a randomized, controlled community trial (REACT) that was conducted in 20 US communities. A random-digit-dial survey documented bystander intentions to use EMS for cardiac symptoms in each community. An emergency department surveillance system documented the mode of transport among chest pain patients in each community and collected ancillary data, including situational factors surrounding the chest pain event. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to use EMS. A total of 962 community members responded to the phone survey, and data were collected on 875 chest pain emergency department arrivals. The mean proportion of community members intending to use EMS during a witnessed cardiac event was 89%; the mean proportion of patients observed using the service was 23%, with significant geographic differences (range, 10% to 48% use). After controlling for covariates, non-EMS users were more likely to try antacids/aspirin and call a doctor and were less likely to subscribe to (or participate in) an EMS prepayment plan. Conclusions - The results of this study indicate that indecision, self-treatment, physician contact, and financial concerns may undermine a chest pain patient's intention to use EMS.

KW - Coronary disease

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034636750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034636750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10889127

AN - SCOPUS:0034636750

VL - 102

SP - 173

EP - 178

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 2

ER -