Decision making among Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules: A qualitative analysis

Christopher G. Slatore, David H. Au, Nancy Press, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Sara E. Golden, Linda Ganzini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Among patients undergoing lung cancer evaluation for newly diagnosed, incidental pulmonary nodules, it is important to evaluate the shared power and responsibility domain of patient-centered communication. We explored Veterans' perceptions of decision making with regards to an incidentally-detected pulmonary nodule. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews of 19 Veterans from one medical center with incidentally-detected pulmonary nodules that were judged as having a low risk for malignancy. We used qualitative description for the analysis, focusing on patients' perceptions of shared decision making with their primary care provider (PCP). Interviews were conducted in 2011 and 2012. Results Patients almost always played a passive role in deciding how and when to evaluate their pulmonary nodule for the possibility of malignancy. Some patients felt comfortable with this role, expressing trust that their clinician would provide the appropriate care. Other patients were not satisfied with how these decisions were made with some expressing concern that no decisions had actually occurred. Regardless of how satisfied they were with the decision, patients did not report discussing how they liked to make decisions with their PCP. Conclusions Veterans in our study did not engage in shared decision making with their clinician. Some were satisfied with this approach although many would have preferred a shared approach. In order to reduce patient distress and improve satisfaction, clinicians may want to consider adopting a shared approach when making decisions about pulmonary nodule evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-539
Number of pages8
JournalRespiratory Medicine
Volume109
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Veterans
Decision Making
Lung
Primary Health Care
Interviews
Lung Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Communication

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Pulmonary nodule
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Decision making among Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules : A qualitative analysis. / Slatore, Christopher G.; Au, David H.; Press, Nancy; Wiener, Renda Soylemez; Golden, Sara E.; Ganzini, Linda.

In: Respiratory Medicine, Vol. 109, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 532-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c752ccdf998f4076bd8fd3edaf844c18,
title = "Decision making among Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules: A qualitative analysis",
abstract = "Purpose Among patients undergoing lung cancer evaluation for newly diagnosed, incidental pulmonary nodules, it is important to evaluate the shared power and responsibility domain of patient-centered communication. We explored Veterans' perceptions of decision making with regards to an incidentally-detected pulmonary nodule. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews of 19 Veterans from one medical center with incidentally-detected pulmonary nodules that were judged as having a low risk for malignancy. We used qualitative description for the analysis, focusing on patients' perceptions of shared decision making with their primary care provider (PCP). Interviews were conducted in 2011 and 2012. Results Patients almost always played a passive role in deciding how and when to evaluate their pulmonary nodule for the possibility of malignancy. Some patients felt comfortable with this role, expressing trust that their clinician would provide the appropriate care. Other patients were not satisfied with how these decisions were made with some expressing concern that no decisions had actually occurred. Regardless of how satisfied they were with the decision, patients did not report discussing how they liked to make decisions with their PCP. Conclusions Veterans in our study did not engage in shared decision making with their clinician. Some were satisfied with this approach although many would have preferred a shared approach. In order to reduce patient distress and improve satisfaction, clinicians may want to consider adopting a shared approach when making decisions about pulmonary nodule evaluation.",
keywords = "Lung cancer, Pulmonary nodule, Shared decision making",
author = "Slatore, {Christopher G.} and Au, {David H.} and Nancy Press and Wiener, {Renda Soylemez} and Golden, {Sara E.} and Linda Ganzini",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rmed.2015.01.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "532--539",
journal = "Respiratory Medicine",
issn = "0954-6111",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision making among Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules

T2 - A qualitative analysis

AU - Slatore, Christopher G.

AU - Au, David H.

AU - Press, Nancy

AU - Wiener, Renda Soylemez

AU - Golden, Sara E.

AU - Ganzini, Linda

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Purpose Among patients undergoing lung cancer evaluation for newly diagnosed, incidental pulmonary nodules, it is important to evaluate the shared power and responsibility domain of patient-centered communication. We explored Veterans' perceptions of decision making with regards to an incidentally-detected pulmonary nodule. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews of 19 Veterans from one medical center with incidentally-detected pulmonary nodules that were judged as having a low risk for malignancy. We used qualitative description for the analysis, focusing on patients' perceptions of shared decision making with their primary care provider (PCP). Interviews were conducted in 2011 and 2012. Results Patients almost always played a passive role in deciding how and when to evaluate their pulmonary nodule for the possibility of malignancy. Some patients felt comfortable with this role, expressing trust that their clinician would provide the appropriate care. Other patients were not satisfied with how these decisions were made with some expressing concern that no decisions had actually occurred. Regardless of how satisfied they were with the decision, patients did not report discussing how they liked to make decisions with their PCP. Conclusions Veterans in our study did not engage in shared decision making with their clinician. Some were satisfied with this approach although many would have preferred a shared approach. In order to reduce patient distress and improve satisfaction, clinicians may want to consider adopting a shared approach when making decisions about pulmonary nodule evaluation.

AB - Purpose Among patients undergoing lung cancer evaluation for newly diagnosed, incidental pulmonary nodules, it is important to evaluate the shared power and responsibility domain of patient-centered communication. We explored Veterans' perceptions of decision making with regards to an incidentally-detected pulmonary nodule. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews of 19 Veterans from one medical center with incidentally-detected pulmonary nodules that were judged as having a low risk for malignancy. We used qualitative description for the analysis, focusing on patients' perceptions of shared decision making with their primary care provider (PCP). Interviews were conducted in 2011 and 2012. Results Patients almost always played a passive role in deciding how and when to evaluate their pulmonary nodule for the possibility of malignancy. Some patients felt comfortable with this role, expressing trust that their clinician would provide the appropriate care. Other patients were not satisfied with how these decisions were made with some expressing concern that no decisions had actually occurred. Regardless of how satisfied they were with the decision, patients did not report discussing how they liked to make decisions with their PCP. Conclusions Veterans in our study did not engage in shared decision making with their clinician. Some were satisfied with this approach although many would have preferred a shared approach. In order to reduce patient distress and improve satisfaction, clinicians may want to consider adopting a shared approach when making decisions about pulmonary nodule evaluation.

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Pulmonary nodule

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925787615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925787615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.01.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 25660437

AN - SCOPUS:84925787615

VL - 109

SP - 532

EP - 539

JO - Respiratory Medicine

JF - Respiratory Medicine

SN - 0954-6111

IS - 4

ER -