Current role of cryotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology

Jennifer L. Simpson, Michele Melia, Michael B. Yang, Angela N. Buffenn, Michael Chiang, Scott R. Lambert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of cryotherapy in the current treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were conducted on December 2, 2009, for articles published after 1984. The searches included all languages and retrieved 187 relevant citations. Thirteen articles were deemed relevant to the assessment question and were rated according to the strength of evidence. Four articles reported results from 2 large multicenter randomized clinical trials, and the remaining 9 articles reported results of 3 small randomized trials that directly compared cryotherapy and laser. Results: Neither of the multicenter randomized clinical trials was a direct comparison of cryotherapy with laser. These studies were used to evaluate the comparative trials based on treatment criteria, study populations, and clinical results. Higher percentages of poor structural and functional outcomes generally were seen in eyes treated with cryotherapy compared with eyes undergoing laser treatment. Higher rates of systemic complications and myopia also were identified after treatment with cryotherapy. Conclusions: Despite a relative paucity of level I evidence directly comparing cryotherapy and laser treatment for threshold ROP, the literature suggests that neonatal facilities should gain access to laser technology and laser-trained ophthalmic staff to achieve better outcomes for treatment of the disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)873-877
Number of pages5
JournalOphthalmology
Volume119
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Retinopathy of Prematurity
Cryotherapy
Ophthalmology
Lasers
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics
Myopia
Disclosure
PubMed
Libraries
Language
Technology
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Current role of cryotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity : A report by the American academy of ophthalmology. / Simpson, Jennifer L.; Melia, Michele; Yang, Michael B.; Buffenn, Angela N.; Chiang, Michael; Lambert, Scott R.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 119, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 873-877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simpson, Jennifer L. ; Melia, Michele ; Yang, Michael B. ; Buffenn, Angela N. ; Chiang, Michael ; Lambert, Scott R. / Current role of cryotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity : A report by the American academy of ophthalmology. In: Ophthalmology. 2012 ; Vol. 119, No. 4. pp. 873-877.
@article{9d37f926e30c4d00a0ea2ce28b1cc6b6,
title = "Current role of cryotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the role of cryotherapy in the current treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were conducted on December 2, 2009, for articles published after 1984. The searches included all languages and retrieved 187 relevant citations. Thirteen articles were deemed relevant to the assessment question and were rated according to the strength of evidence. Four articles reported results from 2 large multicenter randomized clinical trials, and the remaining 9 articles reported results of 3 small randomized trials that directly compared cryotherapy and laser. Results: Neither of the multicenter randomized clinical trials was a direct comparison of cryotherapy with laser. These studies were used to evaluate the comparative trials based on treatment criteria, study populations, and clinical results. Higher percentages of poor structural and functional outcomes generally were seen in eyes treated with cryotherapy compared with eyes undergoing laser treatment. Higher rates of systemic complications and myopia also were identified after treatment with cryotherapy. Conclusions: Despite a relative paucity of level I evidence directly comparing cryotherapy and laser treatment for threshold ROP, the literature suggests that neonatal facilities should gain access to laser technology and laser-trained ophthalmic staff to achieve better outcomes for treatment of the disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.",
author = "Simpson, {Jennifer L.} and Michele Melia and Yang, {Michael B.} and Buffenn, {Angela N.} and Michael Chiang and Lambert, {Scott R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "873--877",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current role of cryotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity

T2 - A report by the American academy of ophthalmology

AU - Simpson, Jennifer L.

AU - Melia, Michele

AU - Yang, Michael B.

AU - Buffenn, Angela N.

AU - Chiang, Michael

AU - Lambert, Scott R.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the role of cryotherapy in the current treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were conducted on December 2, 2009, for articles published after 1984. The searches included all languages and retrieved 187 relevant citations. Thirteen articles were deemed relevant to the assessment question and were rated according to the strength of evidence. Four articles reported results from 2 large multicenter randomized clinical trials, and the remaining 9 articles reported results of 3 small randomized trials that directly compared cryotherapy and laser. Results: Neither of the multicenter randomized clinical trials was a direct comparison of cryotherapy with laser. These studies were used to evaluate the comparative trials based on treatment criteria, study populations, and clinical results. Higher percentages of poor structural and functional outcomes generally were seen in eyes treated with cryotherapy compared with eyes undergoing laser treatment. Higher rates of systemic complications and myopia also were identified after treatment with cryotherapy. Conclusions: Despite a relative paucity of level I evidence directly comparing cryotherapy and laser treatment for threshold ROP, the literature suggests that neonatal facilities should gain access to laser technology and laser-trained ophthalmic staff to achieve better outcomes for treatment of the disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the role of cryotherapy in the current treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were conducted on December 2, 2009, for articles published after 1984. The searches included all languages and retrieved 187 relevant citations. Thirteen articles were deemed relevant to the assessment question and were rated according to the strength of evidence. Four articles reported results from 2 large multicenter randomized clinical trials, and the remaining 9 articles reported results of 3 small randomized trials that directly compared cryotherapy and laser. Results: Neither of the multicenter randomized clinical trials was a direct comparison of cryotherapy with laser. These studies were used to evaluate the comparative trials based on treatment criteria, study populations, and clinical results. Higher percentages of poor structural and functional outcomes generally were seen in eyes treated with cryotherapy compared with eyes undergoing laser treatment. Higher rates of systemic complications and myopia also were identified after treatment with cryotherapy. Conclusions: Despite a relative paucity of level I evidence directly comparing cryotherapy and laser treatment for threshold ROP, the literature suggests that neonatal facilities should gain access to laser technology and laser-trained ophthalmic staff to achieve better outcomes for treatment of the disease. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859265164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859265164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 22381808

AN - SCOPUS:84859265164

VL - 119

SP - 873

EP - 877

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 4

ER -