TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia
T2 - I. In vivo determination of total left ventricular “area at risk”
AU - Kaul, Sanjiv
AU - Pandian, Natesa G.
AU - Okada, Robert D.
AU - Pohost, Gerald M.
AU - Weyman, Arthur E.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Cardiac Unit, Department of Medicein, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, ostonB, aMssachusetts. This tusdy was spupoertd in part by grants HL 07535, HL 26215 adn HL 27511 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Okada is stEablished Investigator of the American artHe Ass , Dallas, Texas. The data were presented in part at the 56th Annual ccientifiS Sessions of eth American Heart Ass, November 1983, Anaheim, Californai. Manucripst received March 5, ;1984 evirsed mscranuipt received June 18, 1984, acceedpt July 2, 1984. *ePrsetn address: Division of Cardoloigy, Box ,158 University of Virginai School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. Address for reprints: Arthur E. Weyman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Non-Invasive Cardiac Laboratory , oston,B Massachusetts 02114 .
PY - 1984
Y1 - 1984
N2 - Myocardial contrast echocardiography has been shown recently to accurately assess the “area at risk” for necrosis after acute coronary occlusion in the experimental model. Risk area quantitation, however, has been studied primarily from single tomographic planes. Because the three-dimensional extent of myocardial necrosis depends on the total volume of myocardium at risk, the total left ventricular “area at risk” was determined in 11 dogs (Group A) with either left anterior descending or left circumflex artery occlusion using contrast echocardiography and compared with risk area determined by technetium autoradiography. An excellent correlation was found between the two methods (r = 0.96, y = 0.91x + 1.5, p < 0.001, SEE = 3.17). A comparison of risk area for individual levels of the left ventricle using both methods, however, showed some variation in the degree of correlation, with the poorest fit being apparent at the apex. To identify the source of the variation, errors caused by data registration were minimized in six additional dogs (Group B) by implanting epicardial markers at a single level and measuring “area at risk” at this level using both methods. When no registration error was present, the correlation between the two methods was excellent (r = 0.99, y = 0.92x + 2.6, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.55). In conclusion, the “area at risk” for infarction after acute coronary occlusion can be determined accurately for the entire left ventricle as well as for a single tomographic slice using myocardial contrast echocardiography. This was validated using technetium autoradiography, which is an established method of determining “area at risk” in the experimental setting.
AB - Myocardial contrast echocardiography has been shown recently to accurately assess the “area at risk” for necrosis after acute coronary occlusion in the experimental model. Risk area quantitation, however, has been studied primarily from single tomographic planes. Because the three-dimensional extent of myocardial necrosis depends on the total volume of myocardium at risk, the total left ventricular “area at risk” was determined in 11 dogs (Group A) with either left anterior descending or left circumflex artery occlusion using contrast echocardiography and compared with risk area determined by technetium autoradiography. An excellent correlation was found between the two methods (r = 0.96, y = 0.91x + 1.5, p < 0.001, SEE = 3.17). A comparison of risk area for individual levels of the left ventricle using both methods, however, showed some variation in the degree of correlation, with the poorest fit being apparent at the apex. To identify the source of the variation, errors caused by data registration were minimized in six additional dogs (Group B) by implanting epicardial markers at a single level and measuring “area at risk” at this level using both methods. When no registration error was present, the correlation between the two methods was excellent (r = 0.99, y = 0.92x + 2.6, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.55). In conclusion, the “area at risk” for infarction after acute coronary occlusion can be determined accurately for the entire left ventricle as well as for a single tomographic slice using myocardial contrast echocardiography. This was validated using technetium autoradiography, which is an established method of determining “area at risk” in the experimental setting.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021718405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021718405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(84)80149-7
DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(84)80149-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 6094639
AN - SCOPUS:0021718405
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 4
SP - 1272
EP - 1282
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 6
ER -