Confidence Interval Calculation Methods Are Infrequently Reported in Emergency-medicine Literature

Marr Amy, Michael Kurz, Jessica Stern, Erik Kulstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There are many different confidence interval calculation methods, each providing different as well as in some cases inadequate interval estimates. Readers who know which method is used are better able to understand potentially significant limitations in study reports. Objectives: To quantify how often confidence interval calculation methods are disclosed by authors in four peer-reviewed North American emergency-medicine journals. Methods: The authors independently performed searches of four journals for all studies in which comparisons were made between means, medians, proportions, odds ratios, or relative risks. Case reports, editorials, subject reviews, and letters were excluded. Using a standardized abstraction form developed on a spreadsheet, the authors evaluated each article for the reporting of confidence intervals and evaluated the description of methodology used to calculate the confidence intervals. Results: A total of 212 articles met the inclusion criteria. Confidence intervals were reported in 123 articles (58%; 95% CI = 51% to 64%); of these, a description of methodology was reported in 12 (9.8%; 95% CI = 5.7% to 16%). Conclusions: Confidence interval methods of calculation are disclosed infrequently in emergency medicine literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-76
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicine in Literature
Emergency Medicine
Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • approximate methods
  • confidence intervals
  • exact method
  • statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Confidence Interval Calculation Methods Are Infrequently Reported in Emergency-medicine Literature. / Amy, Marr; Kurz, Michael; Stern, Jessica; Kulstad, Erik.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 74-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amy, Marr ; Kurz, Michael ; Stern, Jessica ; Kulstad, Erik. / Confidence Interval Calculation Methods Are Infrequently Reported in Emergency-medicine Literature. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 74-76.
@article{2b597aad81bb4fdcad4c9e86f9c0b4b3,
title = "Confidence Interval Calculation Methods Are Infrequently Reported in Emergency-medicine Literature",
abstract = "Background: There are many different confidence interval calculation methods, each providing different as well as in some cases inadequate interval estimates. Readers who know which method is used are better able to understand potentially significant limitations in study reports. Objectives: To quantify how often confidence interval calculation methods are disclosed by authors in four peer-reviewed North American emergency-medicine journals. Methods: The authors independently performed searches of four journals for all studies in which comparisons were made between means, medians, proportions, odds ratios, or relative risks. Case reports, editorials, subject reviews, and letters were excluded. Using a standardized abstraction form developed on a spreadsheet, the authors evaluated each article for the reporting of confidence intervals and evaluated the description of methodology used to calculate the confidence intervals. Results: A total of 212 articles met the inclusion criteria. Confidence intervals were reported in 123 articles (58{\%}; 95{\%} CI = 51{\%} to 64{\%}); of these, a description of methodology was reported in 12 (9.8{\%}; 95{\%} CI = 5.7{\%} to 16{\%}). Conclusions: Confidence interval methods of calculation are disclosed infrequently in emergency medicine literature.",
keywords = "approximate methods, confidence intervals, exact method, statistics",
author = "Marr Amy and Michael Kurz and Jessica Stern and Erik Kulstad",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "74--76",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confidence Interval Calculation Methods Are Infrequently Reported in Emergency-medicine Literature

AU - Amy, Marr

AU - Kurz, Michael

AU - Stern, Jessica

AU - Kulstad, Erik

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Background: There are many different confidence interval calculation methods, each providing different as well as in some cases inadequate interval estimates. Readers who know which method is used are better able to understand potentially significant limitations in study reports. Objectives: To quantify how often confidence interval calculation methods are disclosed by authors in four peer-reviewed North American emergency-medicine journals. Methods: The authors independently performed searches of four journals for all studies in which comparisons were made between means, medians, proportions, odds ratios, or relative risks. Case reports, editorials, subject reviews, and letters were excluded. Using a standardized abstraction form developed on a spreadsheet, the authors evaluated each article for the reporting of confidence intervals and evaluated the description of methodology used to calculate the confidence intervals. Results: A total of 212 articles met the inclusion criteria. Confidence intervals were reported in 123 articles (58%; 95% CI = 51% to 64%); of these, a description of methodology was reported in 12 (9.8%; 95% CI = 5.7% to 16%). Conclusions: Confidence interval methods of calculation are disclosed infrequently in emergency medicine literature.

AB - Background: There are many different confidence interval calculation methods, each providing different as well as in some cases inadequate interval estimates. Readers who know which method is used are better able to understand potentially significant limitations in study reports. Objectives: To quantify how often confidence interval calculation methods are disclosed by authors in four peer-reviewed North American emergency-medicine journals. Methods: The authors independently performed searches of four journals for all studies in which comparisons were made between means, medians, proportions, odds ratios, or relative risks. Case reports, editorials, subject reviews, and letters were excluded. Using a standardized abstraction form developed on a spreadsheet, the authors evaluated each article for the reporting of confidence intervals and evaluated the description of methodology used to calculate the confidence intervals. Results: A total of 212 articles met the inclusion criteria. Confidence intervals were reported in 123 articles (58%; 95% CI = 51% to 64%); of these, a description of methodology was reported in 12 (9.8%; 95% CI = 5.7% to 16%). Conclusions: Confidence interval methods of calculation are disclosed infrequently in emergency medicine literature.

KW - approximate methods

KW - confidence intervals

KW - exact method

KW - statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845792923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845792923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.014

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.014

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 74

EP - 76

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 1

ER -