Comparison of ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations using bilaterally matched teeth.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations. Seventy-six roots from 29 bilaterally matched pairs of human teeth in cadavers were used in this study. In group 1 ultrasonic preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. In group 2 high-speed bur preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. The size of the bony crypt was measured and the teeth were extracted and radiographed mesial-distally and buccal-lingually. None of the root-end preparations resulted in root perforation. The mean mesial-distal minimum depth of ultrasonic and high-speed bur preparations were 2.11 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively. The mean buccal-lingual minimum depth of preparation was 2.51 mm for the ultrasonic and 2.05 mm for the high-speed bur preparations. The depth of the ultrasonic preparations was significantly greater for both measurements. A significantly greater bevel angle was associated with the bur preparations, 35.1 degrees versus 16.0 degrees for the ultrasonic preparations. The incidence of ultrasonic root-end preparations deviating from the uninstrumented canal spaces was found to be 2.6%. All bur root-end preparations were at an acute angle to the long axis of the root. The bony crypt size for bur preparations was significantly greater than that for ultrasonic preparations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-452
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume23
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
Tooth
Cheek
Cadaver
Tongue
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparison of ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations using bilaterally matched teeth. / Mehlhaff, D. S.; Marshall, J (Gordon); Baumgartner, John (Craig).

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 23, No. 7, 07.1997, p. 448-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26de9c3574b44981931136bf2a4f077d,
title = "Comparison of ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations using bilaterally matched teeth.",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations. Seventy-six roots from 29 bilaterally matched pairs of human teeth in cadavers were used in this study. In group 1 ultrasonic preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. In group 2 high-speed bur preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. The size of the bony crypt was measured and the teeth were extracted and radiographed mesial-distally and buccal-lingually. None of the root-end preparations resulted in root perforation. The mean mesial-distal minimum depth of ultrasonic and high-speed bur preparations were 2.11 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively. The mean buccal-lingual minimum depth of preparation was 2.51 mm for the ultrasonic and 2.05 mm for the high-speed bur preparations. The depth of the ultrasonic preparations was significantly greater for both measurements. A significantly greater bevel angle was associated with the bur preparations, 35.1 degrees versus 16.0 degrees for the ultrasonic preparations. The incidence of ultrasonic root-end preparations deviating from the uninstrumented canal spaces was found to be 2.6{\%}. All bur root-end preparations were at an acute angle to the long axis of the root. The bony crypt size for bur preparations was significantly greater than that for ultrasonic preparations.",
author = "Mehlhaff, {D. S.} and Marshall, {J (Gordon)} and Baumgartner, {John (Craig)}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "448--452",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations using bilaterally matched teeth.

AU - Mehlhaff, D. S.

AU - Marshall, J (Gordon)

AU - Baumgartner, John (Craig)

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations. Seventy-six roots from 29 bilaterally matched pairs of human teeth in cadavers were used in this study. In group 1 ultrasonic preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. In group 2 high-speed bur preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. The size of the bony crypt was measured and the teeth were extracted and radiographed mesial-distally and buccal-lingually. None of the root-end preparations resulted in root perforation. The mean mesial-distal minimum depth of ultrasonic and high-speed bur preparations were 2.11 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively. The mean buccal-lingual minimum depth of preparation was 2.51 mm for the ultrasonic and 2.05 mm for the high-speed bur preparations. The depth of the ultrasonic preparations was significantly greater for both measurements. A significantly greater bevel angle was associated with the bur preparations, 35.1 degrees versus 16.0 degrees for the ultrasonic preparations. The incidence of ultrasonic root-end preparations deviating from the uninstrumented canal spaces was found to be 2.6%. All bur root-end preparations were at an acute angle to the long axis of the root. The bony crypt size for bur preparations was significantly greater than that for ultrasonic preparations.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare ultrasonic and high-speed-bur root-end preparations. Seventy-six roots from 29 bilaterally matched pairs of human teeth in cadavers were used in this study. In group 1 ultrasonic preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. In group 2 high-speed bur preparations were made in 38 roots and filled with amalgam. The size of the bony crypt was measured and the teeth were extracted and radiographed mesial-distally and buccal-lingually. None of the root-end preparations resulted in root perforation. The mean mesial-distal minimum depth of ultrasonic and high-speed bur preparations were 2.11 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively. The mean buccal-lingual minimum depth of preparation was 2.51 mm for the ultrasonic and 2.05 mm for the high-speed bur preparations. The depth of the ultrasonic preparations was significantly greater for both measurements. A significantly greater bevel angle was associated with the bur preparations, 35.1 degrees versus 16.0 degrees for the ultrasonic preparations. The incidence of ultrasonic root-end preparations deviating from the uninstrumented canal spaces was found to be 2.6%. All bur root-end preparations were at an acute angle to the long axis of the root. The bony crypt size for bur preparations was significantly greater than that for ultrasonic preparations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031175217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031175217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 448

EP - 452

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 7

ER -