Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Irrigation Using the EndoVac to Endodontic Needle Delivery

Todd A. Miller, J. Craig Baumgartner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations


Introduction: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of root canal irrigation with the EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA) to endodontic needle irrigation in the apical 5 mm of root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Methods: Bilaterally matched, extracted human teeth were sterilized and inoculated with E. faecalis. Specimens in the EndoVac group were irrigated using the EndoVac system, whereas those in the needle group were irrigated with a 30-G side-vented needle. After chemomechanical preparation, the apical 5 mm of the roots were removed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and pulverized to expose E. faecalis in dentinal tubules or other morphologic irregularities. The number of colony forming units (cfus) of E. faecalis per mg dentin was determined. Results: The EndoVac Group had a mean of 31.6 cfu/mg, whereas the needle group had a mean of 157 cfu/mg. This represents a bacterial reduction of 99.7% in group A and 98.8% in group B when compared with positive controls. Conclusion: Although there were fewer cfu/mg when using the EndoVac, there was not a statistically significant difference between the EndoVac and needle groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-511
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of endodontics
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010


  • Disinfection
  • EndoVac
  • irrigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Irrigation Using the EndoVac to Endodontic Needle Delivery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this