Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting

Suzanne Mitchell, Vanessa B. Wilson, Sarah Karalunas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Delay discounting is a widely studied phenomenon due to its ubiquity in psychopathological disorders. Several methods are well established to quantify the extent to which a delayed commodity is devalued as a function of the delay to its receipt. The most frequently used method is to fit a hyperbolic function and use an index of the gradient of the function, k, or to calculate the area under the discounting curve. The manuscript examines the behavior of these quantification indices for three different datasets, as well as provides information about potential limitations in their use. The primary limitation examined is the lack of mechanistic specificity provided by either method. Alternative formulations that are thought to provide some mechanistic information are examined for the three separate datasets: two variants of a hyperboloid model (Rachlin, 1989, Judgment, decision and choice. New York: W.H. Freeman) and the quasi-hyperbolic model (Laibson, 1997, Q. J. Econ., 112, 443-477). Examination of the parameters of each formulation suggests that the parameters derived from the quasi-hyperbolic model allows groups and conditions within the three datasets to be reliably distinguished more readily than the hyperboloid models. However, use of the quasi-hyperbolic model is complex and its limitations might offset its ability to discriminate within the datasets."This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SQAB 2014".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-62
Number of pages11
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Manuscripts
Area Under Curve
products and commodities
methodology
Delay Discounting
Datasets

Keywords

  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • Cigarette smoking
  • Delay discounting
  • Impulsive behavior
  • Reward

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting. / Mitchell, Suzanne; Wilson, Vanessa B.; Karalunas, Sarah.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 114, No. 1, 2015, p. 52-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b343a3154cc4168848f8110ae3bdb69,
title = "Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting",
abstract = "Delay discounting is a widely studied phenomenon due to its ubiquity in psychopathological disorders. Several methods are well established to quantify the extent to which a delayed commodity is devalued as a function of the delay to its receipt. The most frequently used method is to fit a hyperbolic function and use an index of the gradient of the function, k, or to calculate the area under the discounting curve. The manuscript examines the behavior of these quantification indices for three different datasets, as well as provides information about potential limitations in their use. The primary limitation examined is the lack of mechanistic specificity provided by either method. Alternative formulations that are thought to provide some mechanistic information are examined for the three separate datasets: two variants of a hyperboloid model (Rachlin, 1989, Judgment, decision and choice. New York: W.H. Freeman) and the quasi-hyperbolic model (Laibson, 1997, Q. J. Econ., 112, 443-477). Examination of the parameters of each formulation suggests that the parameters derived from the quasi-hyperbolic model allows groups and conditions within the three datasets to be reliably distinguished more readily than the hyperboloid models. However, use of the quasi-hyperbolic model is complex and its limitations might offset its ability to discriminate within the datasets.{"}This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SQAB 2014{"}.",
keywords = "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Cigarette smoking, Delay discounting, Impulsive behavior, Reward",
author = "Suzanne Mitchell and Wilson, {Vanessa B.} and Sarah Karalunas",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "52--62",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting

AU - Mitchell, Suzanne

AU - Wilson, Vanessa B.

AU - Karalunas, Sarah

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Delay discounting is a widely studied phenomenon due to its ubiquity in psychopathological disorders. Several methods are well established to quantify the extent to which a delayed commodity is devalued as a function of the delay to its receipt. The most frequently used method is to fit a hyperbolic function and use an index of the gradient of the function, k, or to calculate the area under the discounting curve. The manuscript examines the behavior of these quantification indices for three different datasets, as well as provides information about potential limitations in their use. The primary limitation examined is the lack of mechanistic specificity provided by either method. Alternative formulations that are thought to provide some mechanistic information are examined for the three separate datasets: two variants of a hyperboloid model (Rachlin, 1989, Judgment, decision and choice. New York: W.H. Freeman) and the quasi-hyperbolic model (Laibson, 1997, Q. J. Econ., 112, 443-477). Examination of the parameters of each formulation suggests that the parameters derived from the quasi-hyperbolic model allows groups and conditions within the three datasets to be reliably distinguished more readily than the hyperboloid models. However, use of the quasi-hyperbolic model is complex and its limitations might offset its ability to discriminate within the datasets."This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SQAB 2014".

AB - Delay discounting is a widely studied phenomenon due to its ubiquity in psychopathological disorders. Several methods are well established to quantify the extent to which a delayed commodity is devalued as a function of the delay to its receipt. The most frequently used method is to fit a hyperbolic function and use an index of the gradient of the function, k, or to calculate the area under the discounting curve. The manuscript examines the behavior of these quantification indices for three different datasets, as well as provides information about potential limitations in their use. The primary limitation examined is the lack of mechanistic specificity provided by either method. Alternative formulations that are thought to provide some mechanistic information are examined for the three separate datasets: two variants of a hyperboloid model (Rachlin, 1989, Judgment, decision and choice. New York: W.H. Freeman) and the quasi-hyperbolic model (Laibson, 1997, Q. J. Econ., 112, 443-477). Examination of the parameters of each formulation suggests that the parameters derived from the quasi-hyperbolic model allows groups and conditions within the three datasets to be reliably distinguished more readily than the hyperboloid models. However, use of the quasi-hyperbolic model is complex and its limitations might offset its ability to discriminate within the datasets."This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SQAB 2014".

KW - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

KW - Cigarette smoking

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Impulsive behavior

KW - Reward

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933523426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933523426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 25796454

AN - SCOPUS:84933523426

VL - 114

SP - 52

EP - 62

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 1

ER -