Color and contrast ratio of resin composites for whitened teeth

Juliana da Costa, Marcos Vargas, Edward J. Swift, Eric Anderson, Stephanie Ritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the optical properties, color and contrast ratio (CR) of commercially available resin composites marketed for the restoration of whitened teeth. Methods: Twenty-six resin composites designed for restoration of whitened teeth and four shade B1 (control) were evaluated. Five resin composite disks (d = 12 mm, h = 1.54 mm) were fabricated for each shade of composite and were stored in water at 37 °C for at least 24 h. A colorimeter was used to measure specimen color over both white and black backgrounds. CIELAB and CIExyY color spaces were used. The CIELAB color notation system provides values for L*a*b*. The CIExyY system provides lightness and chromaticity values, where Y represents lightness and xy chromaticity. The contrast ratio (CR) was assessed using, CIE xyY, of the specimens against black (Yb) and white (Yw) backgrounds, with CR = Yb/Yw. The data for L*, a*, b* and CR were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and the correlation L* and CR was analyzed by Pearson correlation test (α = 0.05). Results: Significantly different L*, a*, b* values and CR were observed. Premise XL2 had the highest L* and CR values and Vit-l-escence PS had the lowest. Vit-l-escence PS had the highest a* value and Point 4XL2 had the lowest, Premise XL1 had the highest b* value and Supreme WB the lowest. The L* and CR correlation was positive and statistically significant. Conclusions: Composites designated for whitened teeth have different levels of color and contrast ratio. Awareness of the optical properties of the composites allows the operator to choose the appropriate materials to mimic the remaining tooth structure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume37
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Tooth Bleaching
Composite Resins
Color
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Water

Keywords

  • Composite color
  • Lightness
  • Opacity
  • Resin composite
  • Translucency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Color and contrast ratio of resin composites for whitened teeth. / da Costa, Juliana; Vargas, Marcos; Swift, Edward J.; Anderson, Eric; Ritter, Stephanie.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 37, No. SUPPL. 1, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

da Costa, Juliana ; Vargas, Marcos ; Swift, Edward J. ; Anderson, Eric ; Ritter, Stephanie. / Color and contrast ratio of resin composites for whitened teeth. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2009 ; Vol. 37, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{3da27c9119654cb1a35c7f1a3e5132dc,
title = "Color and contrast ratio of resin composites for whitened teeth",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the optical properties, color and contrast ratio (CR) of commercially available resin composites marketed for the restoration of whitened teeth. Methods: Twenty-six resin composites designed for restoration of whitened teeth and four shade B1 (control) were evaluated. Five resin composite disks (d = 12 mm, h = 1.54 mm) were fabricated for each shade of composite and were stored in water at 37 °C for at least 24 h. A colorimeter was used to measure specimen color over both white and black backgrounds. CIELAB and CIExyY color spaces were used. The CIELAB color notation system provides values for L*a*b*. The CIExyY system provides lightness and chromaticity values, where Y represents lightness and xy chromaticity. The contrast ratio (CR) was assessed using, CIE xyY, of the specimens against black (Yb) and white (Yw) backgrounds, with CR = Yb/Yw. The data for L*, a*, b* and CR were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and the correlation L* and CR was analyzed by Pearson correlation test (α = 0.05). Results: Significantly different L*, a*, b* values and CR were observed. Premise XL2 had the highest L* and CR values and Vit-l-escence PS had the lowest. Vit-l-escence PS had the highest a* value and Point 4XL2 had the lowest, Premise XL1 had the highest b* value and Supreme WB the lowest. The L* and CR correlation was positive and statistically significant. Conclusions: Composites designated for whitened teeth have different levels of color and contrast ratio. Awareness of the optical properties of the composites allows the operator to choose the appropriate materials to mimic the remaining tooth structure.",
keywords = "Composite color, Lightness, Opacity, Resin composite, Translucency",
author = "{da Costa}, Juliana and Marcos Vargas and Swift, {Edward J.} and Eric Anderson and Stephanie Ritter",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Color and contrast ratio of resin composites for whitened teeth

AU - da Costa, Juliana

AU - Vargas, Marcos

AU - Swift, Edward J.

AU - Anderson, Eric

AU - Ritter, Stephanie

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the optical properties, color and contrast ratio (CR) of commercially available resin composites marketed for the restoration of whitened teeth. Methods: Twenty-six resin composites designed for restoration of whitened teeth and four shade B1 (control) were evaluated. Five resin composite disks (d = 12 mm, h = 1.54 mm) were fabricated for each shade of composite and were stored in water at 37 °C for at least 24 h. A colorimeter was used to measure specimen color over both white and black backgrounds. CIELAB and CIExyY color spaces were used. The CIELAB color notation system provides values for L*a*b*. The CIExyY system provides lightness and chromaticity values, where Y represents lightness and xy chromaticity. The contrast ratio (CR) was assessed using, CIE xyY, of the specimens against black (Yb) and white (Yw) backgrounds, with CR = Yb/Yw. The data for L*, a*, b* and CR were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and the correlation L* and CR was analyzed by Pearson correlation test (α = 0.05). Results: Significantly different L*, a*, b* values and CR were observed. Premise XL2 had the highest L* and CR values and Vit-l-escence PS had the lowest. Vit-l-escence PS had the highest a* value and Point 4XL2 had the lowest, Premise XL1 had the highest b* value and Supreme WB the lowest. The L* and CR correlation was positive and statistically significant. Conclusions: Composites designated for whitened teeth have different levels of color and contrast ratio. Awareness of the optical properties of the composites allows the operator to choose the appropriate materials to mimic the remaining tooth structure.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the optical properties, color and contrast ratio (CR) of commercially available resin composites marketed for the restoration of whitened teeth. Methods: Twenty-six resin composites designed for restoration of whitened teeth and four shade B1 (control) were evaluated. Five resin composite disks (d = 12 mm, h = 1.54 mm) were fabricated for each shade of composite and were stored in water at 37 °C for at least 24 h. A colorimeter was used to measure specimen color over both white and black backgrounds. CIELAB and CIExyY color spaces were used. The CIELAB color notation system provides values for L*a*b*. The CIExyY system provides lightness and chromaticity values, where Y represents lightness and xy chromaticity. The contrast ratio (CR) was assessed using, CIE xyY, of the specimens against black (Yb) and white (Yw) backgrounds, with CR = Yb/Yw. The data for L*, a*, b* and CR were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and the correlation L* and CR was analyzed by Pearson correlation test (α = 0.05). Results: Significantly different L*, a*, b* values and CR were observed. Premise XL2 had the highest L* and CR values and Vit-l-escence PS had the lowest. Vit-l-escence PS had the highest a* value and Point 4XL2 had the lowest, Premise XL1 had the highest b* value and Supreme WB the lowest. The L* and CR correlation was positive and statistically significant. Conclusions: Composites designated for whitened teeth have different levels of color and contrast ratio. Awareness of the optical properties of the composites allows the operator to choose the appropriate materials to mimic the remaining tooth structure.

KW - Composite color

KW - Lightness

KW - Opacity

KW - Resin composite

KW - Translucency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649388063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649388063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 19539872

AN - SCOPUS:67649388063

VL - 37

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -