Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: Results from VA cooperative studies program 380

Ziad F. Gellad, David G. Weiss, Dennis J. Ahnen, David Lieberman, George L. Jackson, Dawn Provenzale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Withdrawal time (WT) has been proposed as a quality indicator for colonoscopy based on evidence that it is directly related to the rate of adenoma detection. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that baseline WT is inversely associated with the risk of finding neoplasia at interval colonoscopy. Methods: In all, 3,121 subjects, aged 50-75 years, had screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997 at 13 Veteran Affairs Medical Centers. In all, 1,193 subjects returned by protocol for surveillance within 5.5 years. In the 304 patients without polyps at baseline, we evaluated the contribution of baseline WT to their risk of interval neoplasia using bivariate and logistic regression analysis. We also examined the correlation between mean WT, baseline adenoma detection rate, and interval neoplasia rate at the medical-center level. Results: The average WT at the baseline exam in subjects with neoplasia on follow-up was 15.3 min as compared with 13.2 min in subjects without neoplasia (P=0.18). In a logistic regression model, WT was not associated with the risk of interval neoplasia (P=0.07). At the medical-center level, mean WT was not correlated with the probability of finding interval neoplasia (P=0.61) but was positively correlated with adenoma detection rate at baseline (P=0.03). Conclusions: In this study with a mean baseline WT >12 min, there was no detectable association between WT and risk of future neoplasia. The medical center-level WT was positively correlated with adenoma detection. Therefore, above a certain threshold, WT may no longer be an adequate quality measure for screening colonoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1746-1752
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume105
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Neoplasms
Adenoma
Logistic Models
Veterans
Polyps
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years : Results from VA cooperative studies program 380. / Gellad, Ziad F.; Weiss, David G.; Ahnen, Dennis J.; Lieberman, David; Jackson, George L.; Provenzale, Dawn.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 105, No. 8, 08.2010, p. 1746-1752.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gellad, Ziad F. ; Weiss, David G. ; Ahnen, Dennis J. ; Lieberman, David ; Jackson, George L. ; Provenzale, Dawn. / Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years : Results from VA cooperative studies program 380. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010 ; Vol. 105, No. 8. pp. 1746-1752.
@article{79a80ce411ec4368b303017a4613038d,
title = "Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: Results from VA cooperative studies program 380",
abstract = "Objectives: Withdrawal time (WT) has been proposed as a quality indicator for colonoscopy based on evidence that it is directly related to the rate of adenoma detection. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that baseline WT is inversely associated with the risk of finding neoplasia at interval colonoscopy. Methods: In all, 3,121 subjects, aged 50-75 years, had screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997 at 13 Veteran Affairs Medical Centers. In all, 1,193 subjects returned by protocol for surveillance within 5.5 years. In the 304 patients without polyps at baseline, we evaluated the contribution of baseline WT to their risk of interval neoplasia using bivariate and logistic regression analysis. We also examined the correlation between mean WT, baseline adenoma detection rate, and interval neoplasia rate at the medical-center level. Results: The average WT at the baseline exam in subjects with neoplasia on follow-up was 15.3 min as compared with 13.2 min in subjects without neoplasia (P=0.18). In a logistic regression model, WT was not associated with the risk of interval neoplasia (P=0.07). At the medical-center level, mean WT was not correlated with the probability of finding interval neoplasia (P=0.61) but was positively correlated with adenoma detection rate at baseline (P=0.03). Conclusions: In this study with a mean baseline WT >12 min, there was no detectable association between WT and risk of future neoplasia. The medical center-level WT was positively correlated with adenoma detection. Therefore, above a certain threshold, WT may no longer be an adequate quality measure for screening colonoscopy.",
author = "Gellad, {Ziad F.} and Weiss, {David G.} and Ahnen, {Dennis J.} and David Lieberman and Jackson, {George L.} and Dawn Provenzale",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2010.107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "1746--1752",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years

T2 - Results from VA cooperative studies program 380

AU - Gellad, Ziad F.

AU - Weiss, David G.

AU - Ahnen, Dennis J.

AU - Lieberman, David

AU - Jackson, George L.

AU - Provenzale, Dawn

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Objectives: Withdrawal time (WT) has been proposed as a quality indicator for colonoscopy based on evidence that it is directly related to the rate of adenoma detection. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that baseline WT is inversely associated with the risk of finding neoplasia at interval colonoscopy. Methods: In all, 3,121 subjects, aged 50-75 years, had screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997 at 13 Veteran Affairs Medical Centers. In all, 1,193 subjects returned by protocol for surveillance within 5.5 years. In the 304 patients without polyps at baseline, we evaluated the contribution of baseline WT to their risk of interval neoplasia using bivariate and logistic regression analysis. We also examined the correlation between mean WT, baseline adenoma detection rate, and interval neoplasia rate at the medical-center level. Results: The average WT at the baseline exam in subjects with neoplasia on follow-up was 15.3 min as compared with 13.2 min in subjects without neoplasia (P=0.18). In a logistic regression model, WT was not associated with the risk of interval neoplasia (P=0.07). At the medical-center level, mean WT was not correlated with the probability of finding interval neoplasia (P=0.61) but was positively correlated with adenoma detection rate at baseline (P=0.03). Conclusions: In this study with a mean baseline WT >12 min, there was no detectable association between WT and risk of future neoplasia. The medical center-level WT was positively correlated with adenoma detection. Therefore, above a certain threshold, WT may no longer be an adequate quality measure for screening colonoscopy.

AB - Objectives: Withdrawal time (WT) has been proposed as a quality indicator for colonoscopy based on evidence that it is directly related to the rate of adenoma detection. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that baseline WT is inversely associated with the risk of finding neoplasia at interval colonoscopy. Methods: In all, 3,121 subjects, aged 50-75 years, had screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997 at 13 Veteran Affairs Medical Centers. In all, 1,193 subjects returned by protocol for surveillance within 5.5 years. In the 304 patients without polyps at baseline, we evaluated the contribution of baseline WT to their risk of interval neoplasia using bivariate and logistic regression analysis. We also examined the correlation between mean WT, baseline adenoma detection rate, and interval neoplasia rate at the medical-center level. Results: The average WT at the baseline exam in subjects with neoplasia on follow-up was 15.3 min as compared with 13.2 min in subjects without neoplasia (P=0.18). In a logistic regression model, WT was not associated with the risk of interval neoplasia (P=0.07). At the medical-center level, mean WT was not correlated with the probability of finding interval neoplasia (P=0.61) but was positively correlated with adenoma detection rate at baseline (P=0.03). Conclusions: In this study with a mean baseline WT >12 min, there was no detectable association between WT and risk of future neoplasia. The medical center-level WT was positively correlated with adenoma detection. Therefore, above a certain threshold, WT may no longer be an adequate quality measure for screening colonoscopy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955427823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955427823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2010.107

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2010.107

M3 - Article

C2 - 20234348

AN - SCOPUS:77955427823

VL - 105

SP - 1746

EP - 1752

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 8

ER -