Cognitive screening among acute respiratory failure survivors: A cross-sectional evaluation of the Mini-Mental State Examination

Elizabeth R. Pfoh, Kitty S. Chan, Victor D. Dinglas, Timothy D. Girard, James C. Jackson, Peter E. Morris, Catherine L. Hough, Pedro A. Mendez-Tellez, E. Wesley Ely, Minxuan Huang, Dale M. Needham, Ramona O. Hopkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a common cognitive screening test, but its utility in identifying impairments in survivors of acute respiratory failure is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate MMSE performance versus a concurrently administered detailed neuropsychological test battery in survivors of acute respiratory failure. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used data from the ARDSNet Long Term Outcomes Study (ALTOS) and Awakening and Breathing Controlled Trial (ABC). Participants were 242 survivors of acute respiratory failure. The MMSE and detailed neuropsychological tests were administered at 6 and 12months post-hospital discharge for the ALTOS study, and at hospital discharge, 3 and 12months for the ABC study. Overall cognitive impairment identified by the MMSE (score <24) was compared to impairments identified by the neuropsychological tests. We also matched orientation, registration, attention, memory and language domains on the MMSE to the corresponding neuropsychological test. Pairwise correlations, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and agreement were assessed. Results: Agreement between MMSE and neuropsychological tests for overall cognitive impairment was fair (42 to 80%). Specificity was excellent (≥93%), but sensitivity was poor (19 to 37%). Correlations between MMSE domains and corresponding neuropsychological tests were weak to moderate (6months: r = 0.11 to 0.28; 12months: r = 0.09 to 0.34). The highest correlation between the MMSE and neuropsychological domains was for attention at 6months (r = 0.28) and language at 12months (r = 0.34). Conclusions: In acute respiratory failure survivors, the MMSE has poor sensitivity in detecting cognitive impairment compared with concurrently administered detailed neuropsychological tests. MMSE results in this population should be interpreted with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number220
JournalCritical Care
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 5 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive screening among acute respiratory failure survivors: A cross-sectional evaluation of the Mini-Mental State Examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this