TY - JOUR
T1 - Chest radiographs after dilatational percutaneous tracheotomy
T2 - Are they necessary?
AU - Donaldson, David R.
AU - Emami, A. J.
AU - Wax, Mark K.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - BACKGROUND: The efficacy of routinely obtaining chest radiographs after standard open tracheotomy has been questioned. Recent literature would suggest that after a routine, uncomplicated tracheotomy, chest radiography is a low-yield procedure that incurs unnecessary expense. Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) is rapidly replacing open tracheotomy as the intensive care unit procedure of choice for airway management. Complication rates are equivalent between the two procedures. OBJECTIVE: We examined the value and cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative chest radiographs in patients undergoing PDT. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was a prospective analysis of 54 consecutive PDTs performed at a tertiary care academic institution. RESULTS: Eighteen (33%) patients had chest radiographs obtained within 1 hour of PDT (6 at the request of the otolaryngology service); 35 (66%) underwent radiography more than 2 hours later at the request of the intensive care unit for reasons other than PDT. There were no incidents of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or tracheotomy tube malposition in any patient. Patients undergoing chest radiography within 1 hour of the PDT also had chest radiographs within 12 hours at the request of ICU staff for their underlying disease. CONCLUSIONS: Routine chest radiography after PDT is of low yield. Because most of these patients require chest radiographs for their underlying disease within 12 hours, a cost savings of approximately $13,500 would be realized in this patient population. SIGNIFICANCE: Routine chest radiography after PDT is unwarranted in most cases.
AB - BACKGROUND: The efficacy of routinely obtaining chest radiographs after standard open tracheotomy has been questioned. Recent literature would suggest that after a routine, uncomplicated tracheotomy, chest radiography is a low-yield procedure that incurs unnecessary expense. Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) is rapidly replacing open tracheotomy as the intensive care unit procedure of choice for airway management. Complication rates are equivalent between the two procedures. OBJECTIVE: We examined the value and cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative chest radiographs in patients undergoing PDT. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was a prospective analysis of 54 consecutive PDTs performed at a tertiary care academic institution. RESULTS: Eighteen (33%) patients had chest radiographs obtained within 1 hour of PDT (6 at the request of the otolaryngology service); 35 (66%) underwent radiography more than 2 hours later at the request of the intensive care unit for reasons other than PDT. There were no incidents of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or tracheotomy tube malposition in any patient. Patients undergoing chest radiography within 1 hour of the PDT also had chest radiographs within 12 hours at the request of ICU staff for their underlying disease. CONCLUSIONS: Routine chest radiography after PDT is of low yield. Because most of these patients require chest radiographs for their underlying disease within 12 hours, a cost savings of approximately $13,500 would be realized in this patient population. SIGNIFICANCE: Routine chest radiography after PDT is unwarranted in most cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033813004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033813004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mhn.2000.107455
DO - 10.1067/mhn.2000.107455
M3 - Article
C2 - 10964297
AN - SCOPUS:0033813004
SN - 0194-5998
VL - 123
SP - 236
EP - 239
JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
IS - 3
ER -