Can we improve breast pathology reporting practices? A community-based breast pathology quality improvement program in New Hampshire

Patricia (Patty) Carney, M. Scottie Eliassen, Wendy A. Wells, William G. Swartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We implemented a regional quality assurance program in New Hampshire (NH) to evaluate breast pathology practices and attempt to improve the completeness of information provided in breast surgical pathology reports. We also assessed the degree to which NH pathologists agree with National Guidelines. The program's objective was to promote a consistent standard of care for patients whose breast pathology is interpreted in NH. Using a sequential survey technique, we were able to obtain consensus on breast tissue report content that was similar to National Guidelines. We also found that 52% of the reporting elements improved in the post-intervention period, although only one reached statistical significance. In conclusion, pathology interpretation is the 'gold standard' for determining both screening effectiveness and subsequent treatment of breast cancer, yet variability in breast tissue reporting exists. It is critical that more research be done to improve breast pathology interpretation and reporting practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-98
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Community Health
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
pathology
Breast
Pathology
community
interpretation
Guidelines
gold standard
statistical significance
Surgical Pathology
quality assurance
Standard of Care
cancer
Breast Neoplasms
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Can we improve breast pathology reporting practices? A community-based breast pathology quality improvement program in New Hampshire. / Carney, Patricia (Patty); Eliassen, M. Scottie; Wells, Wendy A.; Swartz, William G.

In: Journal of Community Health, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998, p. 85-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ceed13b706da46f9946be982e19cb39e,
title = "Can we improve breast pathology reporting practices? A community-based breast pathology quality improvement program in New Hampshire",
abstract = "We implemented a regional quality assurance program in New Hampshire (NH) to evaluate breast pathology practices and attempt to improve the completeness of information provided in breast surgical pathology reports. We also assessed the degree to which NH pathologists agree with National Guidelines. The program's objective was to promote a consistent standard of care for patients whose breast pathology is interpreted in NH. Using a sequential survey technique, we were able to obtain consensus on breast tissue report content that was similar to National Guidelines. We also found that 52{\%} of the reporting elements improved in the post-intervention period, although only one reached statistical significance. In conclusion, pathology interpretation is the 'gold standard' for determining both screening effectiveness and subsequent treatment of breast cancer, yet variability in breast tissue reporting exists. It is critical that more research be done to improve breast pathology interpretation and reporting practices.",
author = "Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Eliassen, {M. Scottie} and Wells, {Wendy A.} and Swartz, {William G.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1023/A:1018779022971",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "85--98",
journal = "Journal of Community Health",
issn = "0094-5145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we improve breast pathology reporting practices? A community-based breast pathology quality improvement program in New Hampshire

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Eliassen, M. Scottie

AU - Wells, Wendy A.

AU - Swartz, William G.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - We implemented a regional quality assurance program in New Hampshire (NH) to evaluate breast pathology practices and attempt to improve the completeness of information provided in breast surgical pathology reports. We also assessed the degree to which NH pathologists agree with National Guidelines. The program's objective was to promote a consistent standard of care for patients whose breast pathology is interpreted in NH. Using a sequential survey technique, we were able to obtain consensus on breast tissue report content that was similar to National Guidelines. We also found that 52% of the reporting elements improved in the post-intervention period, although only one reached statistical significance. In conclusion, pathology interpretation is the 'gold standard' for determining both screening effectiveness and subsequent treatment of breast cancer, yet variability in breast tissue reporting exists. It is critical that more research be done to improve breast pathology interpretation and reporting practices.

AB - We implemented a regional quality assurance program in New Hampshire (NH) to evaluate breast pathology practices and attempt to improve the completeness of information provided in breast surgical pathology reports. We also assessed the degree to which NH pathologists agree with National Guidelines. The program's objective was to promote a consistent standard of care for patients whose breast pathology is interpreted in NH. Using a sequential survey technique, we were able to obtain consensus on breast tissue report content that was similar to National Guidelines. We also found that 52% of the reporting elements improved in the post-intervention period, although only one reached statistical significance. In conclusion, pathology interpretation is the 'gold standard' for determining both screening effectiveness and subsequent treatment of breast cancer, yet variability in breast tissue reporting exists. It is critical that more research be done to improve breast pathology interpretation and reporting practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031979583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031979583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1018779022971

DO - 10.1023/A:1018779022971

M3 - Article

C2 - 9591201

AN - SCOPUS:0031979583

VL - 23

SP - 85

EP - 98

JO - Journal of Community Health

JF - Journal of Community Health

SN - 0094-5145

IS - 2

ER -