Bringing Meaning to Numbers: The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions

Ellen Peters, Nathan Dieckmann, Daniel Västfjäll, C. K. Mertz, Paul Slovic, Judith H. Hibbard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decision makers are often quite poor at using numeric information in decisions. The results of 4 experiments demonstrate that a manipulation of evaluative meaning (i.e., the extent to which an attribute can be mapped onto a good/bad scale; this manipulation is accomplished through the addition of visual boundary lines and evaluative labels to a graphical format) has a robust influence in health judgments and choices and across diverse adult populations. The manipulation resulted in greater use of numeric quality-of-care information in judgments and less reliance on an irrelevant affective state among the less numerate. Recall results for provided quality-of-care numbers suggested that the manipulation did not influence depth of number processing with the exception of cost information that was not remembered as well. Results of a reaction-time paradigm revealed that feelings were more accessible than thoughts in the presence of the manipulation, suggesting that the effect may be due, at least in part, to an affective mechanism. Numeric information is often provided in decisions, but may not be usable by consumers without assistance from information providers. Implications for consumer decision making and the functions of affect are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-227
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Reaction Time
Decision Making
Emotions
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Population

Keywords

  • affect
  • decision making
  • health
  • information presentation
  • numeracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Bringing Meaning to Numbers : The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions. / Peters, Ellen; Dieckmann, Nathan; Västfjäll, Daniel; Mertz, C. K.; Slovic, Paul; Hibbard, Judith H.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 15, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 213-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peters, Ellen ; Dieckmann, Nathan ; Västfjäll, Daniel ; Mertz, C. K. ; Slovic, Paul ; Hibbard, Judith H. / Bringing Meaning to Numbers : The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 213-227.
@article{e69fd3d656ff415d9e52e87a47d22ec9,
title = "Bringing Meaning to Numbers: The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions",
abstract = "Decision makers are often quite poor at using numeric information in decisions. The results of 4 experiments demonstrate that a manipulation of evaluative meaning (i.e., the extent to which an attribute can be mapped onto a good/bad scale; this manipulation is accomplished through the addition of visual boundary lines and evaluative labels to a graphical format) has a robust influence in health judgments and choices and across diverse adult populations. The manipulation resulted in greater use of numeric quality-of-care information in judgments and less reliance on an irrelevant affective state among the less numerate. Recall results for provided quality-of-care numbers suggested that the manipulation did not influence depth of number processing with the exception of cost information that was not remembered as well. Results of a reaction-time paradigm revealed that feelings were more accessible than thoughts in the presence of the manipulation, suggesting that the effect may be due, at least in part, to an affective mechanism. Numeric information is often provided in decisions, but may not be usable by consumers without assistance from information providers. Implications for consumer decision making and the functions of affect are discussed.",
keywords = "affect, decision making, health, information presentation, numeracy",
author = "Ellen Peters and Nathan Dieckmann and Daniel V{\"a}stfj{\"a}ll and Mertz, {C. K.} and Paul Slovic and Hibbard, {Judith H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/a0016978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "213--227",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied",
issn = "1076-898X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing Meaning to Numbers

T2 - The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions

AU - Peters, Ellen

AU - Dieckmann, Nathan

AU - Västfjäll, Daniel

AU - Mertz, C. K.

AU - Slovic, Paul

AU - Hibbard, Judith H.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Decision makers are often quite poor at using numeric information in decisions. The results of 4 experiments demonstrate that a manipulation of evaluative meaning (i.e., the extent to which an attribute can be mapped onto a good/bad scale; this manipulation is accomplished through the addition of visual boundary lines and evaluative labels to a graphical format) has a robust influence in health judgments and choices and across diverse adult populations. The manipulation resulted in greater use of numeric quality-of-care information in judgments and less reliance on an irrelevant affective state among the less numerate. Recall results for provided quality-of-care numbers suggested that the manipulation did not influence depth of number processing with the exception of cost information that was not remembered as well. Results of a reaction-time paradigm revealed that feelings were more accessible than thoughts in the presence of the manipulation, suggesting that the effect may be due, at least in part, to an affective mechanism. Numeric information is often provided in decisions, but may not be usable by consumers without assistance from information providers. Implications for consumer decision making and the functions of affect are discussed.

AB - Decision makers are often quite poor at using numeric information in decisions. The results of 4 experiments demonstrate that a manipulation of evaluative meaning (i.e., the extent to which an attribute can be mapped onto a good/bad scale; this manipulation is accomplished through the addition of visual boundary lines and evaluative labels to a graphical format) has a robust influence in health judgments and choices and across diverse adult populations. The manipulation resulted in greater use of numeric quality-of-care information in judgments and less reliance on an irrelevant affective state among the less numerate. Recall results for provided quality-of-care numbers suggested that the manipulation did not influence depth of number processing with the exception of cost information that was not remembered as well. Results of a reaction-time paradigm revealed that feelings were more accessible than thoughts in the presence of the manipulation, suggesting that the effect may be due, at least in part, to an affective mechanism. Numeric information is often provided in decisions, but may not be usable by consumers without assistance from information providers. Implications for consumer decision making and the functions of affect are discussed.

KW - affect

KW - decision making

KW - health

KW - information presentation

KW - numeracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350646727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350646727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0016978

DO - 10.1037/a0016978

M3 - Article

C2 - 19751072

AN - SCOPUS:70350646727

VL - 15

SP - 213

EP - 227

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

SN - 1076-898X

IS - 3

ER -