Brief Report

Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica

Barbara S. Webster, Theodore K. Courtney, Yueng-hsiang Huang, Simon Matz, David C. Christiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence compliance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties. Measurements: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate =25%). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9% and 4.3% of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95% CI = 1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95% CI = 1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians' misunderstanding of sciatica's natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1132-1135
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sciatica
Low Back Pain
Guidelines
Physicians
Internal Medicine
Family Practice
Emergency Medicine
Occupational Medicine
Confidence Intervals
General Practice
Primary Care Physicians
Back Pain
Natural History
Practice Guidelines
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Clinical vignette
  • Decision making
  • Guidelines
  • Practice variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Brief Report : Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica. / Webster, Barbara S.; Courtney, Theodore K.; Huang, Yueng-hsiang; Matz, Simon; Christiani, David C.

In: Journal of general internal medicine, Vol. 20, No. 12, 01.12.2005, p. 1132-1135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Webster, Barbara S. ; Courtney, Theodore K. ; Huang, Yueng-hsiang ; Matz, Simon ; Christiani, David C. / Brief Report : Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica. In: Journal of general internal medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 20, No. 12. pp. 1132-1135.
@article{bf44625bbf344c54a5847b2424fe0c26,
title = "Brief Report: Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence compliance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties. Measurements: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate =25{\%}). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9{\%} and 4.3{\%} of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95{\%} CI = 1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95{\%} CI = 1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians' misunderstanding of sciatica's natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.",
keywords = "Back pain, Clinical vignette, Decision making, Guidelines, Practice variation",
author = "Webster, {Barbara S.} and Courtney, {Theodore K.} and Yueng-hsiang Huang and Simon Matz and Christiani, {David C.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1132--1135",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief Report

T2 - Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica

AU - Webster, Barbara S.

AU - Courtney, Theodore K.

AU - Huang, Yueng-hsiang

AU - Matz, Simon

AU - Christiani, David C.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence compliance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties. Measurements: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate =25%). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9% and 4.3% of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95% CI = 1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95% CI = 1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians' misunderstanding of sciatica's natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.

AB - BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence compliance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties. Measurements: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate =25%). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9% and 4.3% of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95% CI = 1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95% CI = 1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians' misunderstanding of sciatica's natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.

KW - Back pain

KW - Clinical vignette

KW - Decision making

KW - Guidelines

KW - Practice variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30944460281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30944460281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1132

EP - 1135

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 12

ER -