Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training

Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia

Shearwood McClelland, Marina Chernykh, Natalia Dengina, Erin F. Gillespie, Anna Likhacheva, Sergey Usychkin, Alexandr Pankratov, Ekaterina Kharitonova, Yulia Egorova, Ilya Tsimafeyeu, Sergei Tjulandin, Charles Thomas, Timur Mitin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5% response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75%) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76% were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81% continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51%) and internet access (38%). Nearly 90% reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57%) and/or organs at risk (46%). More than 97% found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43%) or several times per week (41%). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 25 2018

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Atlases
Russia
Medical Oncology
Education
Communication Barriers
Organs at Risk
Moscow
Continuing Medical Education
Research Ethics Committees
Internet
Language
Software
Demography
Radiation Oncologists
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Clinical target volume
  • eContour.org
  • Global oncology
  • Organs at risk
  • Radiation oncology
  • RUSSCO
  • Russia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training : Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia. / McClelland, Shearwood; Chernykh, Marina; Dengina, Natalia; Gillespie, Erin F.; Likhacheva, Anna; Usychkin, Sergey; Pankratov, Alexandr; Kharitonova, Ekaterina; Egorova, Yulia; Tsimafeyeu, Ilya; Tjulandin, Sergei; Thomas, Charles; Mitin, Timur.

In: Journal of Cancer Education, 25.06.2018, p. 1-3.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McClelland, Shearwood ; Chernykh, Marina ; Dengina, Natalia ; Gillespie, Erin F. ; Likhacheva, Anna ; Usychkin, Sergey ; Pankratov, Alexandr ; Kharitonova, Ekaterina ; Egorova, Yulia ; Tsimafeyeu, Ilya ; Tjulandin, Sergei ; Thomas, Charles ; Mitin, Timur. / Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training : Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia. In: Journal of Cancer Education. 2018 ; pp. 1-3.
@article{ff4d876e845d4cdf97c8fb95ea88d686,
title = "Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training: Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia",
abstract = "Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5{\%} response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75{\%}) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76{\%} were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81{\%} continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51{\%}) and internet access (38{\%}). Nearly 90{\%} reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57{\%}) and/or organs at risk (46{\%}). More than 97{\%} found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43{\%}) or several times per week (41{\%}). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.",
keywords = "Clinical target volume, eContour.org, Global oncology, Organs at risk, Radiation oncology, RUSSCO, Russia",
author = "Shearwood McClelland and Marina Chernykh and Natalia Dengina and Gillespie, {Erin F.} and Anna Likhacheva and Sergey Usychkin and Alexandr Pankratov and Ekaterina Kharitonova and Yulia Egorova and Ilya Tsimafeyeu and Sergei Tjulandin and Charles Thomas and Timur Mitin",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
issn = "0885-8195",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training

T2 - Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia

AU - McClelland, Shearwood

AU - Chernykh, Marina

AU - Dengina, Natalia

AU - Gillespie, Erin F.

AU - Likhacheva, Anna

AU - Usychkin, Sergey

AU - Pankratov, Alexandr

AU - Kharitonova, Ekaterina

AU - Egorova, Yulia

AU - Tsimafeyeu, Ilya

AU - Tjulandin, Sergei

AU - Thomas, Charles

AU - Mitin, Timur

PY - 2018/6/25

Y1 - 2018/6/25

N2 - Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5% response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75%) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76% were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81% continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51%) and internet access (38%). Nearly 90% reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57%) and/or organs at risk (46%). More than 97% found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43%) or several times per week (41%). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.

AB - Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5% response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75%) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76% were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81% continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51%) and internet access (38%). Nearly 90% reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57%) and/or organs at risk (46%). More than 97% found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43%) or several times per week (41%). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.

KW - Clinical target volume

KW - eContour.org

KW - Global oncology

KW - Organs at risk

KW - Radiation oncology

KW - RUSSCO

KW - Russia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049027315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049027315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7

DO - 10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Journal of Cancer Education

JF - Journal of Cancer Education

SN - 0885-8195

ER -