Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz

Richard Burwick, Gene T. Lee, Jennifer L. Benedict, Michael G. Ross, Siri L. Kjos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Cervical length (CL) examinations may identify patients in preterm labor or those who may benefit from prophylactic therapy. We sought to compare the accuracy of clinician digital CL examinations with objective measurements using the Cervilenz device in women presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. Study Design: Forty-two patients with singleton gestation from 24 to 34 weeks' gestation and cervical dilation less than 3 cm underwent speculum examination and Cervilenz measurement. A second examiner, blinded to results, digitally measured CL. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student t tests and McNemar's tests were used to compare digital and Cervilenz measures. Results: Digital CL was significantly less than Cervilenz (2.88 vs 3.40 cm; P <.001), and in 36% of subjects, this difference exceeded 1 cm. The discrepancy in CL estimates persisted whether women were multiparous or had soft cervices or a history of preterm delivery. Conclusion: Digital assessment underestimates CL, whereas the Cervilenz device permits a visualized and objective CL measure in patients with preterm labor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume200
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cervical Length Measurement
Premature Obstetric Labor
Equipment and Supplies
Pregnancy
Surgical Instruments
Cervix Uteri
Dilatation
Students
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • cervical length
  • Cervilenz
  • preterm labor
  • vaginal examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz. / Burwick, Richard; Lee, Gene T.; Benedict, Jennifer L.; Ross, Michael G.; Kjos, Siri L.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 200, No. 5, 05.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burwick, Richard ; Lee, Gene T. ; Benedict, Jennifer L. ; Ross, Michael G. ; Kjos, Siri L. / Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009 ; Vol. 200, No. 5.
@article{ebf827db8ad94c3e94393e305e4e245c,
title = "Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz",
abstract = "Objective: Cervical length (CL) examinations may identify patients in preterm labor or those who may benefit from prophylactic therapy. We sought to compare the accuracy of clinician digital CL examinations with objective measurements using the Cervilenz device in women presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. Study Design: Forty-two patients with singleton gestation from 24 to 34 weeks' gestation and cervical dilation less than 3 cm underwent speculum examination and Cervilenz measurement. A second examiner, blinded to results, digitally measured CL. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student t tests and McNemar's tests were used to compare digital and Cervilenz measures. Results: Digital CL was significantly less than Cervilenz (2.88 vs 3.40 cm; P <.001), and in 36{\%} of subjects, this difference exceeded 1 cm. The discrepancy in CL estimates persisted whether women were multiparous or had soft cervices or a history of preterm delivery. Conclusion: Digital assessment underestimates CL, whereas the Cervilenz device permits a visualized and objective CL measure in patients with preterm labor.",
keywords = "cervical length, Cervilenz, preterm labor, vaginal examination",
author = "Richard Burwick and Lee, {Gene T.} and Benedict, {Jennifer L.} and Ross, {Michael G.} and Kjos, {Siri L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "200",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz

AU - Burwick, Richard

AU - Lee, Gene T.

AU - Benedict, Jennifer L.

AU - Ross, Michael G.

AU - Kjos, Siri L.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Objective: Cervical length (CL) examinations may identify patients in preterm labor or those who may benefit from prophylactic therapy. We sought to compare the accuracy of clinician digital CL examinations with objective measurements using the Cervilenz device in women presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. Study Design: Forty-two patients with singleton gestation from 24 to 34 weeks' gestation and cervical dilation less than 3 cm underwent speculum examination and Cervilenz measurement. A second examiner, blinded to results, digitally measured CL. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student t tests and McNemar's tests were used to compare digital and Cervilenz measures. Results: Digital CL was significantly less than Cervilenz (2.88 vs 3.40 cm; P <.001), and in 36% of subjects, this difference exceeded 1 cm. The discrepancy in CL estimates persisted whether women were multiparous or had soft cervices or a history of preterm delivery. Conclusion: Digital assessment underestimates CL, whereas the Cervilenz device permits a visualized and objective CL measure in patients with preterm labor.

AB - Objective: Cervical length (CL) examinations may identify patients in preterm labor or those who may benefit from prophylactic therapy. We sought to compare the accuracy of clinician digital CL examinations with objective measurements using the Cervilenz device in women presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. Study Design: Forty-two patients with singleton gestation from 24 to 34 weeks' gestation and cervical dilation less than 3 cm underwent speculum examination and Cervilenz measurement. A second examiner, blinded to results, digitally measured CL. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student t tests and McNemar's tests were used to compare digital and Cervilenz measures. Results: Digital CL was significantly less than Cervilenz (2.88 vs 3.40 cm; P <.001), and in 36% of subjects, this difference exceeded 1 cm. The discrepancy in CL estimates persisted whether women were multiparous or had soft cervices or a history of preterm delivery. Conclusion: Digital assessment underestimates CL, whereas the Cervilenz device permits a visualized and objective CL measure in patients with preterm labor.

KW - cervical length

KW - Cervilenz

KW - preterm labor

KW - vaginal examination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64449088609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64449088609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.026

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 19200931

AN - SCOPUS:64449088609

VL - 200

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -