Billing for physician services: A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation

Jason Chao, William G. Gillanders, Sue Flocke, Meredith A. Goodwin, George E. Kikano, Kurt C. Stange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Little is known about the accuracy of family physicians' use of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding scheme for office visits, despite increased administrative oversight of Medicare billing practices. In addition, the patient and visit characteristics that are associated with over- and undercoding are not well understood. METHODS. This study compared coding for evaluation and management (E and M) services billed for 3791 visits to 138 family physicians with the codes assigned by trained research nurses using direct observation. We calculated the degree to which the codes for E and M were concordant with the observer-assigned codes. Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used to examine the association of visit and patient characteristics with discordance between billed and observer-assigned CPT codes. RESULTS. Billing codes were concordant for 55% of encounters. Discordance was evenly distributed between under- and overcoding. Concordance of billed and observed codes was greatest for patients with indemnity insurance. Undercoding increased with longer visit length and a smaller percentage of the visit spent planning treatment. Overcoding was more common during visits with a greater percentage of time spent chatting, planning treatment, and delivering preventive services. CONCLUSIONS. Family physicians are generally accurate in their billing procedures. The findings on patient and visit characteristics associated with over- or undercoding may be used by practicing clinicians to enhance the accuracy of their coding and billing procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-32
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume47
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Current Procedural Terminology
Family Physicians
Observation
Physicians
Insurance
Office Visits
Medicare
Analysis of Variance
Logistic Models
Nurses
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • Billing and coding [non-MeSH]
  • Insurance claim reporting
  • Office visits
  • Physicians, family

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Chao, J., Gillanders, W. G., Flocke, S., Goodwin, M. A., Kikano, G. E., & Stange, K. C. (1998). Billing for physician services: A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation. Journal of Family Practice, 47(1), 28-32.

Billing for physician services : A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation. / Chao, Jason; Gillanders, William G.; Flocke, Sue; Goodwin, Meredith A.; Kikano, George E.; Stange, Kurt C.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.07.1998, p. 28-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chao, J, Gillanders, WG, Flocke, S, Goodwin, MA, Kikano, GE & Stange, KC 1998, 'Billing for physician services: A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation', Journal of Family Practice, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 28-32.
Chao, Jason ; Gillanders, William G. ; Flocke, Sue ; Goodwin, Meredith A. ; Kikano, George E. ; Stange, Kurt C. / Billing for physician services : A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation. In: Journal of Family Practice. 1998 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 28-32.
@article{31baa803836f4b5c9a39bfa1f82720f5,
title = "Billing for physician services: A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. Little is known about the accuracy of family physicians' use of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding scheme for office visits, despite increased administrative oversight of Medicare billing practices. In addition, the patient and visit characteristics that are associated with over- and undercoding are not well understood. METHODS. This study compared coding for evaluation and management (E and M) services billed for 3791 visits to 138 family physicians with the codes assigned by trained research nurses using direct observation. We calculated the degree to which the codes for E and M were concordant with the observer-assigned codes. Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used to examine the association of visit and patient characteristics with discordance between billed and observer-assigned CPT codes. RESULTS. Billing codes were concordant for 55{\%} of encounters. Discordance was evenly distributed between under- and overcoding. Concordance of billed and observed codes was greatest for patients with indemnity insurance. Undercoding increased with longer visit length and a smaller percentage of the visit spent planning treatment. Overcoding was more common during visits with a greater percentage of time spent chatting, planning treatment, and delivering preventive services. CONCLUSIONS. Family physicians are generally accurate in their billing procedures. The findings on patient and visit characteristics associated with over- or undercoding may be used by practicing clinicians to enhance the accuracy of their coding and billing procedures.",
keywords = "Billing and coding [non-MeSH], Insurance claim reporting, Office visits, Physicians, family",
author = "Jason Chao and Gillanders, {William G.} and Sue Flocke and Goodwin, {Meredith A.} and Kikano, {George E.} and Stange, {Kurt C.}",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "28--32",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Billing for physician services

T2 - A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation

AU - Chao, Jason

AU - Gillanders, William G.

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Goodwin, Meredith A.

AU - Kikano, George E.

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

PY - 1998/7/1

Y1 - 1998/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND. Little is known about the accuracy of family physicians' use of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding scheme for office visits, despite increased administrative oversight of Medicare billing practices. In addition, the patient and visit characteristics that are associated with over- and undercoding are not well understood. METHODS. This study compared coding for evaluation and management (E and M) services billed for 3791 visits to 138 family physicians with the codes assigned by trained research nurses using direct observation. We calculated the degree to which the codes for E and M were concordant with the observer-assigned codes. Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used to examine the association of visit and patient characteristics with discordance between billed and observer-assigned CPT codes. RESULTS. Billing codes were concordant for 55% of encounters. Discordance was evenly distributed between under- and overcoding. Concordance of billed and observed codes was greatest for patients with indemnity insurance. Undercoding increased with longer visit length and a smaller percentage of the visit spent planning treatment. Overcoding was more common during visits with a greater percentage of time spent chatting, planning treatment, and delivering preventive services. CONCLUSIONS. Family physicians are generally accurate in their billing procedures. The findings on patient and visit characteristics associated with over- or undercoding may be used by practicing clinicians to enhance the accuracy of their coding and billing procedures.

AB - BACKGROUND. Little is known about the accuracy of family physicians' use of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding scheme for office visits, despite increased administrative oversight of Medicare billing practices. In addition, the patient and visit characteristics that are associated with over- and undercoding are not well understood. METHODS. This study compared coding for evaluation and management (E and M) services billed for 3791 visits to 138 family physicians with the codes assigned by trained research nurses using direct observation. We calculated the degree to which the codes for E and M were concordant with the observer-assigned codes. Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used to examine the association of visit and patient characteristics with discordance between billed and observer-assigned CPT codes. RESULTS. Billing codes were concordant for 55% of encounters. Discordance was evenly distributed between under- and overcoding. Concordance of billed and observed codes was greatest for patients with indemnity insurance. Undercoding increased with longer visit length and a smaller percentage of the visit spent planning treatment. Overcoding was more common during visits with a greater percentage of time spent chatting, planning treatment, and delivering preventive services. CONCLUSIONS. Family physicians are generally accurate in their billing procedures. The findings on patient and visit characteristics associated with over- or undercoding may be used by practicing clinicians to enhance the accuracy of their coding and billing procedures.

KW - Billing and coding [non-MeSH]

KW - Insurance claim reporting

KW - Office visits

KW - Physicians, family

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031847211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031847211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9673605

AN - SCOPUS:0031847211

VL - 47

SP - 28

EP - 32

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 1

ER -