Beyond organic

Consumer interest in new labelling schemes in the Central Coast of California

Philip H. Howard, Patricia Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Producers are interested in developing labelling schemes that go ‘beyond organic’ to address ethical criteria not included the US Department of Agriculture organic standards. However, consumer interests in labels that are not as widely available as organic in the market are poorly understood. This study reports results of focus-group research and a survey of 1000 households in the Central Coast region of California to determine which standards consumers are most interested in supporting through their purchases. The results indicate that standards for the humane treatment of animals have the highest level of support, followed by a standard for local origin, and for a living wage for workers involved in producing food. Logistic regression analysis suggests that humane is more likely to be chosen by women, European-Americans, younger people and frequent organic purchasers. Locally grown was preferred by older people and households with children. A living wage for workers involved in food production was selected more often by Latinos. Although a characterization of trends is not possible due to a cross-sectional design, the results suggest some potential directions for producers in this region who are willing to supply unmet consumer demands for ethical criteria. There are three basic directions that new and emerging labels may take with respect to US national organic standards: (1) separate from organic; (2) institutionally separate, but tightly integrated with organic; and (3) intended to supplant organic. The success of each of these strategies will depend on how much trust consumers continue to place in government oversight of organic food. The study results also suggest that the movement for a more sustainable food system would benefit from devoting more attention to issues of animal rights and social justice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-451
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Consumer Studies
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Food
Organic Food
Animal Rights
United States Department of Agriculture
Social Justice
Focus Groups
Hispanic Americans
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Labeling
Coast
Research
Direction compound
Therapeutics
Living wage
Workers
Animals
Household
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Eco-labels
  • Ethical consumerism
  • Humane
  • Living wage
  • Local
  • Organic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Marketing

Cite this

Beyond organic : Consumer interest in new labelling schemes in the Central Coast of California. / Howard, Philip H.; Allen, Patricia.

In: International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 30, No. 5, 01.01.2006, p. 439-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48625ed373324e49aa0d2b913b95a2a7,
title = "Beyond organic: Consumer interest in new labelling schemes in the Central Coast of California",
abstract = "Producers are interested in developing labelling schemes that go ‘beyond organic’ to address ethical criteria not included the US Department of Agriculture organic standards. However, consumer interests in labels that are not as widely available as organic in the market are poorly understood. This study reports results of focus-group research and a survey of 1000 households in the Central Coast region of California to determine which standards consumers are most interested in supporting through their purchases. The results indicate that standards for the humane treatment of animals have the highest level of support, followed by a standard for local origin, and for a living wage for workers involved in producing food. Logistic regression analysis suggests that humane is more likely to be chosen by women, European-Americans, younger people and frequent organic purchasers. Locally grown was preferred by older people and households with children. A living wage for workers involved in food production was selected more often by Latinos. Although a characterization of trends is not possible due to a cross-sectional design, the results suggest some potential directions for producers in this region who are willing to supply unmet consumer demands for ethical criteria. There are three basic directions that new and emerging labels may take with respect to US national organic standards: (1) separate from organic; (2) institutionally separate, but tightly integrated with organic; and (3) intended to supplant organic. The success of each of these strategies will depend on how much trust consumers continue to place in government oversight of organic food. The study results also suggest that the movement for a more sustainable food system would benefit from devoting more attention to issues of animal rights and social justice.",
keywords = "Eco-labels, Ethical consumerism, Humane, Living wage, Local, Organic",
author = "Howard, {Philip H.} and Patricia Allen",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00536.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "439--451",
journal = "International Journal of Consumer Studies",
issn = "1470-6423",
publisher = "Blackwell Science",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond organic

T2 - Consumer interest in new labelling schemes in the Central Coast of California

AU - Howard, Philip H.

AU - Allen, Patricia

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Producers are interested in developing labelling schemes that go ‘beyond organic’ to address ethical criteria not included the US Department of Agriculture organic standards. However, consumer interests in labels that are not as widely available as organic in the market are poorly understood. This study reports results of focus-group research and a survey of 1000 households in the Central Coast region of California to determine which standards consumers are most interested in supporting through their purchases. The results indicate that standards for the humane treatment of animals have the highest level of support, followed by a standard for local origin, and for a living wage for workers involved in producing food. Logistic regression analysis suggests that humane is more likely to be chosen by women, European-Americans, younger people and frequent organic purchasers. Locally grown was preferred by older people and households with children. A living wage for workers involved in food production was selected more often by Latinos. Although a characterization of trends is not possible due to a cross-sectional design, the results suggest some potential directions for producers in this region who are willing to supply unmet consumer demands for ethical criteria. There are three basic directions that new and emerging labels may take with respect to US national organic standards: (1) separate from organic; (2) institutionally separate, but tightly integrated with organic; and (3) intended to supplant organic. The success of each of these strategies will depend on how much trust consumers continue to place in government oversight of organic food. The study results also suggest that the movement for a more sustainable food system would benefit from devoting more attention to issues of animal rights and social justice.

AB - Producers are interested in developing labelling schemes that go ‘beyond organic’ to address ethical criteria not included the US Department of Agriculture organic standards. However, consumer interests in labels that are not as widely available as organic in the market are poorly understood. This study reports results of focus-group research and a survey of 1000 households in the Central Coast region of California to determine which standards consumers are most interested in supporting through their purchases. The results indicate that standards for the humane treatment of animals have the highest level of support, followed by a standard for local origin, and for a living wage for workers involved in producing food. Logistic regression analysis suggests that humane is more likely to be chosen by women, European-Americans, younger people and frequent organic purchasers. Locally grown was preferred by older people and households with children. A living wage for workers involved in food production was selected more often by Latinos. Although a characterization of trends is not possible due to a cross-sectional design, the results suggest some potential directions for producers in this region who are willing to supply unmet consumer demands for ethical criteria. There are three basic directions that new and emerging labels may take with respect to US national organic standards: (1) separate from organic; (2) institutionally separate, but tightly integrated with organic; and (3) intended to supplant organic. The success of each of these strategies will depend on how much trust consumers continue to place in government oversight of organic food. The study results also suggest that the movement for a more sustainable food system would benefit from devoting more attention to issues of animal rights and social justice.

KW - Eco-labels

KW - Ethical consumerism

KW - Humane

KW - Living wage

KW - Local

KW - Organic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548411156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548411156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00536.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00536.x

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 439

EP - 451

JO - International Journal of Consumer Studies

JF - International Journal of Consumer Studies

SN - 1470-6423

IS - 5

ER -