Benign radiographic coronal synostosis after sagittal synostosis repair

Anna Kuang, Tina Jenq, Ryne Didier, Lauren Moneta, Dianna Bardo, Nathan Selden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether cranial vault remodeling surgery for nonsyndromic, isolated sagittal suture synostosis affects the patency of initially normal, unaffected sutures is unknown. The influence of coronal and lambdoidal suture patency after cranial vault remodeling on the trajectory of subsequent cranial growth is also unknown. Disruption of normal sutural anatomy during cranial vault reconstruction could influence the incidence of secondary craniosynostosis and need for reoperation in a small proportion of these patients.We performed a retrospective review of patients younger than 1 year with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated at a single tertiary referral pediatric hospital from September 2005 to January 2010 by an interdisciplinary team. Computed tomographic images obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively were evaluated for the occurrence of secondary synostosis of initially nonsynostotic sutures. Craniofacial disorders clinic and ophthalmologic follow-up records were also analyzed for the occurrence of radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of intracranial hypertension (ICH), and reoperation.Fifty-one patients younger than 1 year underwent primary surgical repair of isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis during the study period. Thirty-seven of these patients (71%) had completed 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up by the time of analysis, constituting the study population. The average age at surgery was 5.4 months (range, 3.1-11.5 months). Thirty-three (89%) of the 37 study patients showed radiographic evidence of bilateral secondary coronal synostosis (SCS). Five patients (15%) additionally showed partial lambdoid synostosis. One patient with radiographic SCS (3%) required reoperation for radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical signs and symptoms of ICH, and papilledema first noted 1 year after primary cranial vault reconstruction.There is a high incidence of secondary coronal suture synostosis following cranial vault remodeling for isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Postoperative SCS was only rarely associated with secondary radiographic cranial stenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of ICH, and the need for reoperation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)937-940
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Synostosis
Craniosynostoses
Sutures
Reoperation
Intracranial Hypertension
Papilledema
Pediatric Hospitals
Incidence
Tertiary Care Centers
Signs and Symptoms
Anatomy
Pathologic Constriction
Growth

Keywords

  • Cranial synostosis
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Reoperation
  • Sagittal synostosis
  • Secondary synostosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Benign radiographic coronal synostosis after sagittal synostosis repair. / Kuang, Anna; Jenq, Tina; Didier, Ryne; Moneta, Lauren; Bardo, Dianna; Selden, Nathan.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 3, 05.2013, p. 937-940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuang, Anna ; Jenq, Tina ; Didier, Ryne ; Moneta, Lauren ; Bardo, Dianna ; Selden, Nathan. / Benign radiographic coronal synostosis after sagittal synostosis repair. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 937-940.
@article{20602a1c78654b548ade787173ed2c6a,
title = "Benign radiographic coronal synostosis after sagittal synostosis repair",
abstract = "Whether cranial vault remodeling surgery for nonsyndromic, isolated sagittal suture synostosis affects the patency of initially normal, unaffected sutures is unknown. The influence of coronal and lambdoidal suture patency after cranial vault remodeling on the trajectory of subsequent cranial growth is also unknown. Disruption of normal sutural anatomy during cranial vault reconstruction could influence the incidence of secondary craniosynostosis and need for reoperation in a small proportion of these patients.We performed a retrospective review of patients younger than 1 year with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated at a single tertiary referral pediatric hospital from September 2005 to January 2010 by an interdisciplinary team. Computed tomographic images obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively were evaluated for the occurrence of secondary synostosis of initially nonsynostotic sutures. Craniofacial disorders clinic and ophthalmologic follow-up records were also analyzed for the occurrence of radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of intracranial hypertension (ICH), and reoperation.Fifty-one patients younger than 1 year underwent primary surgical repair of isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis during the study period. Thirty-seven of these patients (71{\%}) had completed 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up by the time of analysis, constituting the study population. The average age at surgery was 5.4 months (range, 3.1-11.5 months). Thirty-three (89{\%}) of the 37 study patients showed radiographic evidence of bilateral secondary coronal synostosis (SCS). Five patients (15{\%}) additionally showed partial lambdoid synostosis. One patient with radiographic SCS (3{\%}) required reoperation for radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical signs and symptoms of ICH, and papilledema first noted 1 year after primary cranial vault reconstruction.There is a high incidence of secondary coronal suture synostosis following cranial vault remodeling for isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Postoperative SCS was only rarely associated with secondary radiographic cranial stenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of ICH, and the need for reoperation.",
keywords = "Cranial synostosis, Intracranial hypertension, Reoperation, Sagittal synostosis, Secondary synostosis",
author = "Anna Kuang and Tina Jenq and Ryne Didier and Lauren Moneta and Dianna Bardo and Nathan Selden",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828dcf24",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "937--940",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benign radiographic coronal synostosis after sagittal synostosis repair

AU - Kuang, Anna

AU - Jenq, Tina

AU - Didier, Ryne

AU - Moneta, Lauren

AU - Bardo, Dianna

AU - Selden, Nathan

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Whether cranial vault remodeling surgery for nonsyndromic, isolated sagittal suture synostosis affects the patency of initially normal, unaffected sutures is unknown. The influence of coronal and lambdoidal suture patency after cranial vault remodeling on the trajectory of subsequent cranial growth is also unknown. Disruption of normal sutural anatomy during cranial vault reconstruction could influence the incidence of secondary craniosynostosis and need for reoperation in a small proportion of these patients.We performed a retrospective review of patients younger than 1 year with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated at a single tertiary referral pediatric hospital from September 2005 to January 2010 by an interdisciplinary team. Computed tomographic images obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively were evaluated for the occurrence of secondary synostosis of initially nonsynostotic sutures. Craniofacial disorders clinic and ophthalmologic follow-up records were also analyzed for the occurrence of radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of intracranial hypertension (ICH), and reoperation.Fifty-one patients younger than 1 year underwent primary surgical repair of isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis during the study period. Thirty-seven of these patients (71%) had completed 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up by the time of analysis, constituting the study population. The average age at surgery was 5.4 months (range, 3.1-11.5 months). Thirty-three (89%) of the 37 study patients showed radiographic evidence of bilateral secondary coronal synostosis (SCS). Five patients (15%) additionally showed partial lambdoid synostosis. One patient with radiographic SCS (3%) required reoperation for radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical signs and symptoms of ICH, and papilledema first noted 1 year after primary cranial vault reconstruction.There is a high incidence of secondary coronal suture synostosis following cranial vault remodeling for isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Postoperative SCS was only rarely associated with secondary radiographic cranial stenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of ICH, and the need for reoperation.

AB - Whether cranial vault remodeling surgery for nonsyndromic, isolated sagittal suture synostosis affects the patency of initially normal, unaffected sutures is unknown. The influence of coronal and lambdoidal suture patency after cranial vault remodeling on the trajectory of subsequent cranial growth is also unknown. Disruption of normal sutural anatomy during cranial vault reconstruction could influence the incidence of secondary craniosynostosis and need for reoperation in a small proportion of these patients.We performed a retrospective review of patients younger than 1 year with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated at a single tertiary referral pediatric hospital from September 2005 to January 2010 by an interdisciplinary team. Computed tomographic images obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively were evaluated for the occurrence of secondary synostosis of initially nonsynostotic sutures. Craniofacial disorders clinic and ophthalmologic follow-up records were also analyzed for the occurrence of radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of intracranial hypertension (ICH), and reoperation.Fifty-one patients younger than 1 year underwent primary surgical repair of isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis during the study period. Thirty-seven of these patients (71%) had completed 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up by the time of analysis, constituting the study population. The average age at surgery was 5.4 months (range, 3.1-11.5 months). Thirty-three (89%) of the 37 study patients showed radiographic evidence of bilateral secondary coronal synostosis (SCS). Five patients (15%) additionally showed partial lambdoid synostosis. One patient with radiographic SCS (3%) required reoperation for radiographic cranial restenosis, clinical signs and symptoms of ICH, and papilledema first noted 1 year after primary cranial vault reconstruction.There is a high incidence of secondary coronal suture synostosis following cranial vault remodeling for isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Postoperative SCS was only rarely associated with secondary radiographic cranial stenosis, clinical or ophthalmologic signs of ICH, and the need for reoperation.

KW - Cranial synostosis

KW - Intracranial hypertension

KW - Reoperation

KW - Sagittal synostosis

KW - Secondary synostosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880116755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880116755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828dcf24

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828dcf24

M3 - Article

C2 - 23714915

AN - SCOPUS:84880116755

VL - 24

SP - 937

EP - 940

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 3

ER -