TY - JOUR
T1 - Attitudes toward prenatal testing and pregnancy termination among a diverse population of parents of children with intellectual disabilities
AU - Kuppermann, Miriam
AU - Nakagawa, Sanae
AU - Cohen, Shana Raquel
AU - Dominguez-Pareto, Irenka
AU - Shaffer, Brian L.
AU - Holloway, Susan D.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Objective: To determine how parents of children with intellectual disabilities view prenatal testing and pregnancy termination for their child's condition. Method: We interviewed 201 English-speaking or Spanish-speaking caregivers of children aged 2 to 10years. Primary outcomes were being disinclined to undergo prenatal testing or pregnancy termination for the child's condition in a future pregnancy. Results: While only 33% of the sample indicated they would not have prenatal testing, 75% were disinclined to terminate their pregnancy if their fetus was affected. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, Asians were significantly less likely than White participants to say they would forego prenatal testing (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.01-0.86, p=0.037), while Latinos had lower odds of being disinclined to terminate (aOR=0.27, 95% CI=0.07-0.99, p=0.048). Participants who felt that abortion for their child's condition should not be available were more likely to say they would forego prenatal testing (aOR=5.10, 95% CI=2.09-12.43, p<0.001) and, not surprisingly, they were also at higher odds of being disinclined to terminate pregnancy for this condition (aOR=13.63, 95%=CI 4.19-44.34, p<0.001). Greater life satisfaction also was associated with being disinclined to terminate pregnancy (aOR=3.40, 95% CI=1.34-8.61, p=0.010). Conclusion: Although many parents of children with intellectual disabilities believe they would desire information regarding their fetus in a future pregnancy, most feel they would not opt to terminate their pregnancy. As new tests for intellectual disabilities become available, determining what would be most useful to prospective parents should become a high priority.
AB - Objective: To determine how parents of children with intellectual disabilities view prenatal testing and pregnancy termination for their child's condition. Method: We interviewed 201 English-speaking or Spanish-speaking caregivers of children aged 2 to 10years. Primary outcomes were being disinclined to undergo prenatal testing or pregnancy termination for the child's condition in a future pregnancy. Results: While only 33% of the sample indicated they would not have prenatal testing, 75% were disinclined to terminate their pregnancy if their fetus was affected. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, Asians were significantly less likely than White participants to say they would forego prenatal testing (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.01-0.86, p=0.037), while Latinos had lower odds of being disinclined to terminate (aOR=0.27, 95% CI=0.07-0.99, p=0.048). Participants who felt that abortion for their child's condition should not be available were more likely to say they would forego prenatal testing (aOR=5.10, 95% CI=2.09-12.43, p<0.001) and, not surprisingly, they were also at higher odds of being disinclined to terminate pregnancy for this condition (aOR=13.63, 95%=CI 4.19-44.34, p<0.001). Greater life satisfaction also was associated with being disinclined to terminate pregnancy (aOR=3.40, 95% CI=1.34-8.61, p=0.010). Conclusion: Although many parents of children with intellectual disabilities believe they would desire information regarding their fetus in a future pregnancy, most feel they would not opt to terminate their pregnancy. As new tests for intellectual disabilities become available, determining what would be most useful to prospective parents should become a high priority.
KW - Intellectual disabilities
KW - Pregnancy termination
KW - Prenatal testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82255192288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82255192288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pd.2880
DO - 10.1002/pd.2880
M3 - Article
C2 - 22028300
AN - SCOPUS:82255192288
SN - 0197-3851
VL - 31
SP - 1251
EP - 1258
JO - Prenatal Diagnosis
JF - Prenatal Diagnosis
IS - 13
ER -