Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide

Linda Ganzini, Darien S. Fenn, Melinda A. Lee, Ronald T. Heintz, Joseph Bloom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: After passage, in November 1994, of Oregon's ballot measure legalizing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill persons, the authors surveyed psychiatrists in Oregon to determine their attitudes toward assisted suicide, the factors influencing these attitudes, and how they might both respond to and follow up a request by a primary care physician to evaluate a terminally ill patient desiring assisted suicide. Method: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all 418 Oregon psychiatrists. Results: Seventy- seven percent of psychiatrists (N=321) returned the questionnaire. Two- thirds endorsed the view that a physician should be permitted, under some circumstances, to write a prescription for a medication whose sole purpose would be to allow a patient to end his or her life. One-third endorsed the view that this practice should never be permitted. Over half-favored Oregon's assisted suicide initiative becoming law. Psychiatrists' position on legalization of assisted suicide influenced the likelihood that they would agree to evaluate patients requesting assisted suicide. Only 6% of psychiatrists were very confident that in a single evaluation they could adequately assess whether a psychiatric disorder was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide. Conclusions: Psychiatrists in Oregon are divided in their belief about the ethical permissibility of assisted suicide, and their moral beliefs influence how they might evaluate a patient requesting assisted suicide, should this practice be legalized, Psychiatrists' confidence in their ability to determine whether a psychiatric disorder such as depression was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide was low.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1469-1475
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume153
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Assisted Suicide
Psychiatry
Terminally Ill
Aptitude
Primary Care Physicians
Prescriptions
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Ganzini, L., Fenn, D. S., Lee, M. A., Heintz, R. T., & Bloom, J. (1996). Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(11), 1469-1475.

Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide. / Ganzini, Linda; Fenn, Darien S.; Lee, Melinda A.; Heintz, Ronald T.; Bloom, Joseph.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 153, No. 11, 11.1996, p. 1469-1475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ganzini, L, Fenn, DS, Lee, MA, Heintz, RT & Bloom, J 1996, 'Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 153, no. 11, pp. 1469-1475.
Ganzini, Linda ; Fenn, Darien S. ; Lee, Melinda A. ; Heintz, Ronald T. ; Bloom, Joseph. / Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1996 ; Vol. 153, No. 11. pp. 1469-1475.
@article{be8800767879496b82102afeff1da560,
title = "Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide",
abstract = "Objective: After passage, in November 1994, of Oregon's ballot measure legalizing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill persons, the authors surveyed psychiatrists in Oregon to determine their attitudes toward assisted suicide, the factors influencing these attitudes, and how they might both respond to and follow up a request by a primary care physician to evaluate a terminally ill patient desiring assisted suicide. Method: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all 418 Oregon psychiatrists. Results: Seventy- seven percent of psychiatrists (N=321) returned the questionnaire. Two- thirds endorsed the view that a physician should be permitted, under some circumstances, to write a prescription for a medication whose sole purpose would be to allow a patient to end his or her life. One-third endorsed the view that this practice should never be permitted. Over half-favored Oregon's assisted suicide initiative becoming law. Psychiatrists' position on legalization of assisted suicide influenced the likelihood that they would agree to evaluate patients requesting assisted suicide. Only 6{\%} of psychiatrists were very confident that in a single evaluation they could adequately assess whether a psychiatric disorder was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide. Conclusions: Psychiatrists in Oregon are divided in their belief about the ethical permissibility of assisted suicide, and their moral beliefs influence how they might evaluate a patient requesting assisted suicide, should this practice be legalized, Psychiatrists' confidence in their ability to determine whether a psychiatric disorder such as depression was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide was low.",
author = "Linda Ganzini and Fenn, {Darien S.} and Lee, {Melinda A.} and Heintz, {Ronald T.} and Joseph Bloom",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "1469--1475",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide

AU - Ganzini, Linda

AU - Fenn, Darien S.

AU - Lee, Melinda A.

AU - Heintz, Ronald T.

AU - Bloom, Joseph

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - Objective: After passage, in November 1994, of Oregon's ballot measure legalizing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill persons, the authors surveyed psychiatrists in Oregon to determine their attitudes toward assisted suicide, the factors influencing these attitudes, and how they might both respond to and follow up a request by a primary care physician to evaluate a terminally ill patient desiring assisted suicide. Method: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all 418 Oregon psychiatrists. Results: Seventy- seven percent of psychiatrists (N=321) returned the questionnaire. Two- thirds endorsed the view that a physician should be permitted, under some circumstances, to write a prescription for a medication whose sole purpose would be to allow a patient to end his or her life. One-third endorsed the view that this practice should never be permitted. Over half-favored Oregon's assisted suicide initiative becoming law. Psychiatrists' position on legalization of assisted suicide influenced the likelihood that they would agree to evaluate patients requesting assisted suicide. Only 6% of psychiatrists were very confident that in a single evaluation they could adequately assess whether a psychiatric disorder was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide. Conclusions: Psychiatrists in Oregon are divided in their belief about the ethical permissibility of assisted suicide, and their moral beliefs influence how they might evaluate a patient requesting assisted suicide, should this practice be legalized, Psychiatrists' confidence in their ability to determine whether a psychiatric disorder such as depression was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide was low.

AB - Objective: After passage, in November 1994, of Oregon's ballot measure legalizing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill persons, the authors surveyed psychiatrists in Oregon to determine their attitudes toward assisted suicide, the factors influencing these attitudes, and how they might both respond to and follow up a request by a primary care physician to evaluate a terminally ill patient desiring assisted suicide. Method: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all 418 Oregon psychiatrists. Results: Seventy- seven percent of psychiatrists (N=321) returned the questionnaire. Two- thirds endorsed the view that a physician should be permitted, under some circumstances, to write a prescription for a medication whose sole purpose would be to allow a patient to end his or her life. One-third endorsed the view that this practice should never be permitted. Over half-favored Oregon's assisted suicide initiative becoming law. Psychiatrists' position on legalization of assisted suicide influenced the likelihood that they would agree to evaluate patients requesting assisted suicide. Only 6% of psychiatrists were very confident that in a single evaluation they could adequately assess whether a psychiatric disorder was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide. Conclusions: Psychiatrists in Oregon are divided in their belief about the ethical permissibility of assisted suicide, and their moral beliefs influence how they might evaluate a patient requesting assisted suicide, should this practice be legalized, Psychiatrists' confidence in their ability to determine whether a psychiatric disorder such as depression was impairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide was low.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029858023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029858023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8890683

AN - SCOPUS:0029858023

VL - 153

SP - 1469

EP - 1475

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 11

ER -