At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges

Nathan Dieckmann, Ellen Peters, Robin Gregory

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Numerical uncertainty ranges are often used to convey the precision of a forecast. In three studies, we examined how users perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges and test specific hypotheses about the display characteristics that affect these perceptions. We discuss five primary conclusions from these studies: (1) substantial variation exists in how people perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges; (2) distributional perceptions appear similar whether the uncertain variable is a probability or an outcome; (3) the variation in distributional perceptions is due in part to individual differences in numeracy, with more numerate individuals more likely to perceive the distribution as roughly normal; (4) the variation is also due in part to the presence versus absence of common cues used to convey the correct interpretation (e.g., including a best estimate increases perceptions that the distribution is roughly normal); and (5) simple graphical representations can decrease the variance in distributional perceptions. These results point toward significant opportunities to improve uncertainty communication in climate change and other domains.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1281-1295
    Number of pages15
    JournalRisk Analysis
    Volume35
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    Homing Behavior
    Uncertainty
    Climate Change
    Individuality
    Climate change
    Cues
    Display devices
    Communication

    Keywords

    • Ambiguity
    • Climate change
    • Numeracy
    • Risk communication
    • Uncertainty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physiology (medical)
    • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

    Cite this

    At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges. / Dieckmann, Nathan; Peters, Ellen; Gregory, Robin.

    In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 7, 01.07.2015, p. 1281-1295.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Dieckmann, Nathan ; Peters, Ellen ; Gregory, Robin. / At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges. In: Risk Analysis. 2015 ; Vol. 35, No. 7. pp. 1281-1295.
    @article{b634d26dd6e747b2a7ee468525218c2a,
    title = "At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges",
    abstract = "Numerical uncertainty ranges are often used to convey the precision of a forecast. In three studies, we examined how users perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges and test specific hypotheses about the display characteristics that affect these perceptions. We discuss five primary conclusions from these studies: (1) substantial variation exists in how people perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges; (2) distributional perceptions appear similar whether the uncertain variable is a probability or an outcome; (3) the variation in distributional perceptions is due in part to individual differences in numeracy, with more numerate individuals more likely to perceive the distribution as roughly normal; (4) the variation is also due in part to the presence versus absence of common cues used to convey the correct interpretation (e.g., including a best estimate increases perceptions that the distribution is roughly normal); and (5) simple graphical representations can decrease the variance in distributional perceptions. These results point toward significant opportunities to improve uncertainty communication in climate change and other domains.",
    keywords = "Ambiguity, Climate change, Numeracy, Risk communication, Uncertainty",
    author = "Nathan Dieckmann and Ellen Peters and Robin Gregory",
    year = "2015",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/risa.12358",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "1281--1295",
    journal = "Risk Analysis",
    issn = "0272-4332",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges

    AU - Dieckmann, Nathan

    AU - Peters, Ellen

    AU - Gregory, Robin

    PY - 2015/7/1

    Y1 - 2015/7/1

    N2 - Numerical uncertainty ranges are often used to convey the precision of a forecast. In three studies, we examined how users perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges and test specific hypotheses about the display characteristics that affect these perceptions. We discuss five primary conclusions from these studies: (1) substantial variation exists in how people perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges; (2) distributional perceptions appear similar whether the uncertain variable is a probability or an outcome; (3) the variation in distributional perceptions is due in part to individual differences in numeracy, with more numerate individuals more likely to perceive the distribution as roughly normal; (4) the variation is also due in part to the presence versus absence of common cues used to convey the correct interpretation (e.g., including a best estimate increases perceptions that the distribution is roughly normal); and (5) simple graphical representations can decrease the variance in distributional perceptions. These results point toward significant opportunities to improve uncertainty communication in climate change and other domains.

    AB - Numerical uncertainty ranges are often used to convey the precision of a forecast. In three studies, we examined how users perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges and test specific hypotheses about the display characteristics that affect these perceptions. We discuss five primary conclusions from these studies: (1) substantial variation exists in how people perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges; (2) distributional perceptions appear similar whether the uncertain variable is a probability or an outcome; (3) the variation in distributional perceptions is due in part to individual differences in numeracy, with more numerate individuals more likely to perceive the distribution as roughly normal; (4) the variation is also due in part to the presence versus absence of common cues used to convey the correct interpretation (e.g., including a best estimate increases perceptions that the distribution is roughly normal); and (5) simple graphical representations can decrease the variance in distributional perceptions. These results point toward significant opportunities to improve uncertainty communication in climate change and other domains.

    KW - Ambiguity

    KW - Climate change

    KW - Numeracy

    KW - Risk communication

    KW - Uncertainty

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938076513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938076513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/risa.12358

    DO - 10.1111/risa.12358

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84938076513

    VL - 35

    SP - 1281

    EP - 1295

    JO - Risk Analysis

    JF - Risk Analysis

    SN - 0272-4332

    IS - 7

    ER -