TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of decision-making with patients' perceptions of care and knowledge during longitudinal pulmonary nodule surveillance
AU - Sullivan, Donald R.
AU - Golden, Sara E.
AU - Ganzini, Linda
AU - Wiener, Renda Soylemez
AU - Eden, Karen B.
AU - Slatore, Christopher G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, under award K07 CA190706 (D.R.S.), Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development career development awards (CDA 09-025 and CDP 11-227 [C.G.S.]), and resources from the Veterans Affairs Health Care System (D.R.S., S.E.G., L.G., R.S.W., and C.G.S.). The Department of Veterans Affairs did not have a role in the conduct of the study; in the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data; or in the preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 by the American Thoracic Society.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Rationale: Patient participation in medical decision-making is widely advocated, but outcomes are inconsistent. Objectives: We examined the associations between medical decision-making roles, and patients' perceptions of their care and knowledge while undergoing pulmonary nodule surveillance. Methods: The study setting was an academically affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital network in which 121 participants had 319 decision-making encounters. The Control Preferences Scale was used to assess patients' decision-making roles. Associations between decision-making, including role concordance (i.e., agreement between patients' preferred and actual roles), shared decisionmaking (SDM), and perceptions of care and knowledge, were assessed using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. Results: Participants had a preferred role in 98% of encounters, and most desired an active role (shared or patient controlled). For some encounters (36%), patients did not report their actual decisionmaking role, because they did not know what their role was. Role concordance and SDM occurred in 56% and 26% of encounters, respectively. Role concordance was associated with greater satisfaction with medical care (adjusted odds ratio [Adj-OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-17.26), higher quality of patientreported care (Adj-OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31-6.27), and more disagreement that care could be better (Adj-OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.12-4.16). Role concordance was not associated with improved pulmonary nodule knowledge with respect to lung cancer risk (Adj-OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.63-2.00) or nodule information received (Adj-OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.31-4.13). SDM was not associated with perceptions of care or knowledge. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing longitudinal nodule surveillance, a majority had a preference for having active roles in decision-making. Interestingly, during some encounters, patients did not know what their role was or that a decision was being made. Role concordance was associated with greater patient-reported satisfaction and quality of medical care, but not with improved knowledge. Patient participation in decision-making may influence perceptions of care; however, clinicians may need to focus on other communication strategies or domains to improve patient knowledge and health outcomes.
AB - Rationale: Patient participation in medical decision-making is widely advocated, but outcomes are inconsistent. Objectives: We examined the associations between medical decision-making roles, and patients' perceptions of their care and knowledge while undergoing pulmonary nodule surveillance. Methods: The study setting was an academically affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital network in which 121 participants had 319 decision-making encounters. The Control Preferences Scale was used to assess patients' decision-making roles. Associations between decision-making, including role concordance (i.e., agreement between patients' preferred and actual roles), shared decisionmaking (SDM), and perceptions of care and knowledge, were assessed using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. Results: Participants had a preferred role in 98% of encounters, and most desired an active role (shared or patient controlled). For some encounters (36%), patients did not report their actual decisionmaking role, because they did not know what their role was. Role concordance and SDM occurred in 56% and 26% of encounters, respectively. Role concordance was associated with greater satisfaction with medical care (adjusted odds ratio [Adj-OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-17.26), higher quality of patientreported care (Adj-OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31-6.27), and more disagreement that care could be better (Adj-OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.12-4.16). Role concordance was not associated with improved pulmonary nodule knowledge with respect to lung cancer risk (Adj-OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.63-2.00) or nodule information received (Adj-OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.31-4.13). SDM was not associated with perceptions of care or knowledge. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing longitudinal nodule surveillance, a majority had a preference for having active roles in decision-making. Interestingly, during some encounters, patients did not know what their role was or that a decision was being made. Role concordance was associated with greater patient-reported satisfaction and quality of medical care, but not with improved knowledge. Patient participation in decision-making may influence perceptions of care; however, clinicians may need to focus on other communication strategies or domains to improve patient knowledge and health outcomes.
KW - Communication
KW - Decision-making
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Patient outcome assessment
KW - Pulmonary nodule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032805193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032805193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1021OC
DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1021OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 28489453
AN - SCOPUS:85032805193
SN - 2325-6621
VL - 14
SP - 1690
EP - 1696
JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
IS - 11
ER -