Association between emergency department resources and diagnosis of intimate partner violence

Esther Choo, Christina Nicolaidis, Craig Newgard, Michael K. Hall, Robert (Bob) Lowe, Michael Kennedy McConnell, Kenneth (John) McConnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is little information about which intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and services assist in the identification of IPV in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to examine the association between a variety of resources and documented IPV diagnoses. METHODS: Using billing data assembled from 21 Oregon EDs from 2001 to 2005, we identified patients who were assigned a discharge diagnosis of IPV. We then surveyed ED directors and nurse managers to gain information about IPV-related policies and services offered by participating hospitals. We combined billing data, survey results, and hospital-level variables. Multivariate analysis assessed the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of IPV depending on the policies and services available. RESULTS: In 754 597 adult female ED visits, IPV was diagnosed 1929 times. Mandatory IPV screening and victim advocates were the most commonly available IPV resources. The diagnosis of IPV was independently associated with the use of a standardized intervention checklist (odds ratio: 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.82). Public displays regarding IPV were negatively associated with IPV diagnosis (odds ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.88). CONCLUSION: IPV remains a rare documented diagnosis. Most common hospital-level resources did not demonstrate an association with IPV diagnoses; however, a standardized intervention checklist may play a role in clinician's likelihood of diagnosing IPV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-88
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Intimate Partner Violence
Checklist
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Nurse Administrators
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • battering
  • domestic violence
  • emergency medicine
  • hospital services
  • spouse abuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Association between emergency department resources and diagnosis of intimate partner violence. / Choo, Esther; Nicolaidis, Christina; Newgard, Craig; Hall, Michael K.; Lowe, Robert (Bob); McConnell, Michael Kennedy; McConnell, Kenneth (John).

In: European Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 83-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba242423a3244b83ada9a9454733805b,
title = "Association between emergency department resources and diagnosis of intimate partner violence",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: There is little information about which intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and services assist in the identification of IPV in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to examine the association between a variety of resources and documented IPV diagnoses. METHODS: Using billing data assembled from 21 Oregon EDs from 2001 to 2005, we identified patients who were assigned a discharge diagnosis of IPV. We then surveyed ED directors and nurse managers to gain information about IPV-related policies and services offered by participating hospitals. We combined billing data, survey results, and hospital-level variables. Multivariate analysis assessed the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of IPV depending on the policies and services available. RESULTS: In 754 597 adult female ED visits, IPV was diagnosed 1929 times. Mandatory IPV screening and victim advocates were the most commonly available IPV resources. The diagnosis of IPV was independently associated with the use of a standardized intervention checklist (odds ratio: 1.71; 95{\%} confidence interval: 1.04-2.82). Public displays regarding IPV were negatively associated with IPV diagnosis (odds ratio 0.56; 95{\%} confidence interval: 0.35-0.88). CONCLUSION: IPV remains a rare documented diagnosis. Most common hospital-level resources did not demonstrate an association with IPV diagnoses; however, a standardized intervention checklist may play a role in clinician's likelihood of diagnosing IPV.",
keywords = "battering, domestic violence, emergency medicine, hospital services, spouse abuse",
author = "Esther Choo and Christina Nicolaidis and Craig Newgard and Hall, {Michael K.} and Lowe, {Robert (Bob)} and McConnell, {Michael Kennedy} and McConnell, {Kenneth (John)}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328348a9f2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "83--88",
journal = "European Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0969-9546",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between emergency department resources and diagnosis of intimate partner violence

AU - Choo, Esther

AU - Nicolaidis, Christina

AU - Newgard, Craig

AU - Hall, Michael K.

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

AU - McConnell, Michael Kennedy

AU - McConnell, Kenneth (John)

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: There is little information about which intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and services assist in the identification of IPV in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to examine the association between a variety of resources and documented IPV diagnoses. METHODS: Using billing data assembled from 21 Oregon EDs from 2001 to 2005, we identified patients who were assigned a discharge diagnosis of IPV. We then surveyed ED directors and nurse managers to gain information about IPV-related policies and services offered by participating hospitals. We combined billing data, survey results, and hospital-level variables. Multivariate analysis assessed the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of IPV depending on the policies and services available. RESULTS: In 754 597 adult female ED visits, IPV was diagnosed 1929 times. Mandatory IPV screening and victim advocates were the most commonly available IPV resources. The diagnosis of IPV was independently associated with the use of a standardized intervention checklist (odds ratio: 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.82). Public displays regarding IPV were negatively associated with IPV diagnosis (odds ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.88). CONCLUSION: IPV remains a rare documented diagnosis. Most common hospital-level resources did not demonstrate an association with IPV diagnoses; however, a standardized intervention checklist may play a role in clinician's likelihood of diagnosing IPV.

AB - OBJECTIVE: There is little information about which intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and services assist in the identification of IPV in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to examine the association between a variety of resources and documented IPV diagnoses. METHODS: Using billing data assembled from 21 Oregon EDs from 2001 to 2005, we identified patients who were assigned a discharge diagnosis of IPV. We then surveyed ED directors and nurse managers to gain information about IPV-related policies and services offered by participating hospitals. We combined billing data, survey results, and hospital-level variables. Multivariate analysis assessed the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of IPV depending on the policies and services available. RESULTS: In 754 597 adult female ED visits, IPV was diagnosed 1929 times. Mandatory IPV screening and victim advocates were the most commonly available IPV resources. The diagnosis of IPV was independently associated with the use of a standardized intervention checklist (odds ratio: 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.82). Public displays regarding IPV were negatively associated with IPV diagnosis (odds ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.88). CONCLUSION: IPV remains a rare documented diagnosis. Most common hospital-level resources did not demonstrate an association with IPV diagnoses; however, a standardized intervention checklist may play a role in clinician's likelihood of diagnosing IPV.

KW - battering

KW - domestic violence

KW - emergency medicine

KW - hospital services

KW - spouse abuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858161269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858161269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328348a9f2

DO - 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328348a9f2

M3 - Article

C2 - 22391615

AN - SCOPUS:84858161269

VL - 19

SP - 83

EP - 88

JO - European Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - European Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0969-9546

IS - 2

ER -