Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness

H. Stephen Leff, Dow A. Wieman, Bentson McFarland, Joseph P. Morrissey, Aileen Rothbard, David L. Shern, A. Michael Wylie, Roger A. Boothroyd, T. Scott Stroup, I. Elaine Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This five-site study compared Medicaid managed behavioral health programs and fee-for-service programs on use and quality of services, satisfaction, and symptoms and functioning of adults with serious mental illness. Methods: Adults with serious mental illness in managed care programs (N=958) and fee-for-service programs (N=1,011) in five states were interviewed after the implementation of managed care and six months later. After a multiple regression to standardize the groups for case mix differences, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted, and bioequivalence methods were used to determine whether differences were significant for clinical or policy purposes. Results: A significantly smaller proportion of the managed care group received inpatient care (5.7 percent compared with 11.5 percent). The managed care group received significantly more hours of primary care (4.9 compared with 4.5 hours) and was significantly less healthy. However, none of these differences exceed the bioequivalence criterion of 5 percent. Managed care and fee for service were "not different but not equivalent" on 20 of 34 dependent variables. Cochrane's Q statistic, which measured intersite consistency, was significant for 20 variables. Conclusions: Managed care and fee-for-service Medicaid programs did not differ on most measures; however, a lack of sufficient power was evident for many measures. Full endorsement of managed care for vulnerable populations will require further research that assumes low penetration rates and intersite variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1245-1253
Number of pages9
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume56
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Managed Care Programs
managed care
mental illness
Fee-for-Service Plans
health care
Delivery of Health Care
human being
fee
Therapeutic Equivalency
Group
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Vulnerable Populations
Meta-Analysis
Inpatients
Primary Health Care
statistics
regression
lack
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Leff, H. S., Wieman, D. A., McFarland, B., Morrissey, J. P., Rothbard, A., Shern, D. L., ... Allen, I. E. (2005). Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 56(10), 1245-1253. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1245

Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness. / Leff, H. Stephen; Wieman, Dow A.; McFarland, Bentson; Morrissey, Joseph P.; Rothbard, Aileen; Shern, David L.; Wylie, A. Michael; Boothroyd, Roger A.; Stroup, T. Scott; Allen, I. Elaine.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 56, No. 10, 10.2005, p. 1245-1253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leff, HS, Wieman, DA, McFarland, B, Morrissey, JP, Rothbard, A, Shern, DL, Wylie, AM, Boothroyd, RA, Stroup, TS & Allen, IE 2005, 'Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness', Psychiatric Services, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1245-1253. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1245
Leff HS, Wieman DA, McFarland B, Morrissey JP, Rothbard A, Shern DL et al. Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services. 2005 Oct;56(10):1245-1253. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1245
Leff, H. Stephen ; Wieman, Dow A. ; McFarland, Bentson ; Morrissey, Joseph P. ; Rothbard, Aileen ; Shern, David L. ; Wylie, A. Michael ; Boothroyd, Roger A. ; Stroup, T. Scott ; Allen, I. Elaine. / Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness. In: Psychiatric Services. 2005 ; Vol. 56, No. 10. pp. 1245-1253.
@article{2896498ce6c8477d92966b3f50c683ae,
title = "Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness",
abstract = "Objectives: This five-site study compared Medicaid managed behavioral health programs and fee-for-service programs on use and quality of services, satisfaction, and symptoms and functioning of adults with serious mental illness. Methods: Adults with serious mental illness in managed care programs (N=958) and fee-for-service programs (N=1,011) in five states were interviewed after the implementation of managed care and six months later. After a multiple regression to standardize the groups for case mix differences, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted, and bioequivalence methods were used to determine whether differences were significant for clinical or policy purposes. Results: A significantly smaller proportion of the managed care group received inpatient care (5.7 percent compared with 11.5 percent). The managed care group received significantly more hours of primary care (4.9 compared with 4.5 hours) and was significantly less healthy. However, none of these differences exceed the bioequivalence criterion of 5 percent. Managed care and fee for service were {"}not different but not equivalent{"} on 20 of 34 dependent variables. Cochrane's Q statistic, which measured intersite consistency, was significant for 20 variables. Conclusions: Managed care and fee-for-service Medicaid programs did not differ on most measures; however, a lack of sufficient power was evident for many measures. Full endorsement of managed care for vulnerable populations will require further research that assumes low penetration rates and intersite variability.",
author = "Leff, {H. Stephen} and Wieman, {Dow A.} and Bentson McFarland and Morrissey, {Joseph P.} and Aileen Rothbard and Shern, {David L.} and Wylie, {A. Michael} and Boothroyd, {Roger A.} and Stroup, {T. Scott} and Allen, {I. Elaine}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1245",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "1245--1253",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of medicaid managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness

AU - Leff, H. Stephen

AU - Wieman, Dow A.

AU - McFarland, Bentson

AU - Morrissey, Joseph P.

AU - Rothbard, Aileen

AU - Shern, David L.

AU - Wylie, A. Michael

AU - Boothroyd, Roger A.

AU - Stroup, T. Scott

AU - Allen, I. Elaine

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Objectives: This five-site study compared Medicaid managed behavioral health programs and fee-for-service programs on use and quality of services, satisfaction, and symptoms and functioning of adults with serious mental illness. Methods: Adults with serious mental illness in managed care programs (N=958) and fee-for-service programs (N=1,011) in five states were interviewed after the implementation of managed care and six months later. After a multiple regression to standardize the groups for case mix differences, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted, and bioequivalence methods were used to determine whether differences were significant for clinical or policy purposes. Results: A significantly smaller proportion of the managed care group received inpatient care (5.7 percent compared with 11.5 percent). The managed care group received significantly more hours of primary care (4.9 compared with 4.5 hours) and was significantly less healthy. However, none of these differences exceed the bioequivalence criterion of 5 percent. Managed care and fee for service were "not different but not equivalent" on 20 of 34 dependent variables. Cochrane's Q statistic, which measured intersite consistency, was significant for 20 variables. Conclusions: Managed care and fee-for-service Medicaid programs did not differ on most measures; however, a lack of sufficient power was evident for many measures. Full endorsement of managed care for vulnerable populations will require further research that assumes low penetration rates and intersite variability.

AB - Objectives: This five-site study compared Medicaid managed behavioral health programs and fee-for-service programs on use and quality of services, satisfaction, and symptoms and functioning of adults with serious mental illness. Methods: Adults with serious mental illness in managed care programs (N=958) and fee-for-service programs (N=1,011) in five states were interviewed after the implementation of managed care and six months later. After a multiple regression to standardize the groups for case mix differences, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted, and bioequivalence methods were used to determine whether differences were significant for clinical or policy purposes. Results: A significantly smaller proportion of the managed care group received inpatient care (5.7 percent compared with 11.5 percent). The managed care group received significantly more hours of primary care (4.9 compared with 4.5 hours) and was significantly less healthy. However, none of these differences exceed the bioequivalence criterion of 5 percent. Managed care and fee for service were "not different but not equivalent" on 20 of 34 dependent variables. Cochrane's Q statistic, which measured intersite consistency, was significant for 20 variables. Conclusions: Managed care and fee-for-service Medicaid programs did not differ on most measures; however, a lack of sufficient power was evident for many measures. Full endorsement of managed care for vulnerable populations will require further research that assumes low penetration rates and intersite variability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26044473052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26044473052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1245

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1245

M3 - Article

C2 - 16215190

AN - SCOPUS:26044473052

VL - 56

SP - 1245

EP - 1253

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 10

ER -