Assessing the effectivess of direct digital radiograrhy barrier sheaths and finger cots

Steven Hokett, James R. Honey, Francisco Ruiz, Michael K. Baisden, Michael M. Hoen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Effective cross-contamination prevention is critical for direct digital radiography, or DDR, sensors, which are not sterilizeable; however, current manufacturers' recommendations for standard precautions are limited to the use of plastic barrier sheaths, which are commonly known to tear or leak. The authors sought to determine the incidence of digital radiography barrier-sheath leakage, with and without additional latex finger cot protection, as measured by a water pressure test. Methods. Four hundred plastic barrier sheaths were randomly assigned to four groups based on intraoral radiograph positioning device use and supplemental barrier protection with a latex finger cot. Sheaths were carefully placed to cover DDR sensors for a single intraoral use, gently removed from the sensors and tested for leakage through a water pressure technique. Results. Perforations occurred in 44 to 51 percent of plastic sheaths after a single radiographic exposure. However, only up to 6 percent of the plastic sheaths that were covered by a latex finger cot leaked during the water pressure test. Conclusions. At least 44 percent of the plastic barrier sheaths leaked after a single intra-oral radiographic exposure. Use of a latex finger cot over the plastic sheath significantly reduced leakage to no more than 6 percent. Clinical Implications. Latex finger cots used in conjunction with the standard plastic sheaths that cover DDR sensors may more effectively prevent cross-contamination than do plastic sheaths alone. Dentists who use DDR sensors during highly invasive dental procedures such as dental implant surgery are encouraged to consider supplemental barrier protection for these delicate, expensive and nonsterilizeable sensors to prevent patient cross-contamination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-467
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume131
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plastics
Fingers
Latex
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Pressure
Water
Dental Implants
Dentists
Tears
Tooth
Equipment and Supplies
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Assessing the effectivess of direct digital radiograrhy barrier sheaths and finger cots. / Hokett, Steven; Honey, James R.; Ruiz, Francisco; Baisden, Michael K.; Hoen, Michael M.

In: Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 131, No. 4, 04.2000, p. 463-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hokett, Steven ; Honey, James R. ; Ruiz, Francisco ; Baisden, Michael K. ; Hoen, Michael M. / Assessing the effectivess of direct digital radiograrhy barrier sheaths and finger cots. In: Journal of the American Dental Association. 2000 ; Vol. 131, No. 4. pp. 463-467.
@article{481ca8f7f728484cba053697466e89fb,
title = "Assessing the effectivess of direct digital radiograrhy barrier sheaths and finger cots",
abstract = "Background. Effective cross-contamination prevention is critical for direct digital radiography, or DDR, sensors, which are not sterilizeable; however, current manufacturers' recommendations for standard precautions are limited to the use of plastic barrier sheaths, which are commonly known to tear or leak. The authors sought to determine the incidence of digital radiography barrier-sheath leakage, with and without additional latex finger cot protection, as measured by a water pressure test. Methods. Four hundred plastic barrier sheaths were randomly assigned to four groups based on intraoral radiograph positioning device use and supplemental barrier protection with a latex finger cot. Sheaths were carefully placed to cover DDR sensors for a single intraoral use, gently removed from the sensors and tested for leakage through a water pressure technique. Results. Perforations occurred in 44 to 51 percent of plastic sheaths after a single radiographic exposure. However, only up to 6 percent of the plastic sheaths that were covered by a latex finger cot leaked during the water pressure test. Conclusions. At least 44 percent of the plastic barrier sheaths leaked after a single intra-oral radiographic exposure. Use of a latex finger cot over the plastic sheath significantly reduced leakage to no more than 6 percent. Clinical Implications. Latex finger cots used in conjunction with the standard plastic sheaths that cover DDR sensors may more effectively prevent cross-contamination than do plastic sheaths alone. Dentists who use DDR sensors during highly invasive dental procedures such as dental implant surgery are encouraged to consider supplemental barrier protection for these delicate, expensive and nonsterilizeable sensors to prevent patient cross-contamination.",
author = "Steven Hokett and Honey, {James R.} and Francisco Ruiz and Baisden, {Michael K.} and Hoen, {Michael M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "463--467",
journal = "Journal of the American Dental Association",
issn = "0002-8177",
publisher = "American Dental Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the effectivess of direct digital radiograrhy barrier sheaths and finger cots

AU - Hokett, Steven

AU - Honey, James R.

AU - Ruiz, Francisco

AU - Baisden, Michael K.

AU - Hoen, Michael M.

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - Background. Effective cross-contamination prevention is critical for direct digital radiography, or DDR, sensors, which are not sterilizeable; however, current manufacturers' recommendations for standard precautions are limited to the use of plastic barrier sheaths, which are commonly known to tear or leak. The authors sought to determine the incidence of digital radiography barrier-sheath leakage, with and without additional latex finger cot protection, as measured by a water pressure test. Methods. Four hundred plastic barrier sheaths were randomly assigned to four groups based on intraoral radiograph positioning device use and supplemental barrier protection with a latex finger cot. Sheaths were carefully placed to cover DDR sensors for a single intraoral use, gently removed from the sensors and tested for leakage through a water pressure technique. Results. Perforations occurred in 44 to 51 percent of plastic sheaths after a single radiographic exposure. However, only up to 6 percent of the plastic sheaths that were covered by a latex finger cot leaked during the water pressure test. Conclusions. At least 44 percent of the plastic barrier sheaths leaked after a single intra-oral radiographic exposure. Use of a latex finger cot over the plastic sheath significantly reduced leakage to no more than 6 percent. Clinical Implications. Latex finger cots used in conjunction with the standard plastic sheaths that cover DDR sensors may more effectively prevent cross-contamination than do plastic sheaths alone. Dentists who use DDR sensors during highly invasive dental procedures such as dental implant surgery are encouraged to consider supplemental barrier protection for these delicate, expensive and nonsterilizeable sensors to prevent patient cross-contamination.

AB - Background. Effective cross-contamination prevention is critical for direct digital radiography, or DDR, sensors, which are not sterilizeable; however, current manufacturers' recommendations for standard precautions are limited to the use of plastic barrier sheaths, which are commonly known to tear or leak. The authors sought to determine the incidence of digital radiography barrier-sheath leakage, with and without additional latex finger cot protection, as measured by a water pressure test. Methods. Four hundred plastic barrier sheaths were randomly assigned to four groups based on intraoral radiograph positioning device use and supplemental barrier protection with a latex finger cot. Sheaths were carefully placed to cover DDR sensors for a single intraoral use, gently removed from the sensors and tested for leakage through a water pressure technique. Results. Perforations occurred in 44 to 51 percent of plastic sheaths after a single radiographic exposure. However, only up to 6 percent of the plastic sheaths that were covered by a latex finger cot leaked during the water pressure test. Conclusions. At least 44 percent of the plastic barrier sheaths leaked after a single intra-oral radiographic exposure. Use of a latex finger cot over the plastic sheath significantly reduced leakage to no more than 6 percent. Clinical Implications. Latex finger cots used in conjunction with the standard plastic sheaths that cover DDR sensors may more effectively prevent cross-contamination than do plastic sheaths alone. Dentists who use DDR sensors during highly invasive dental procedures such as dental implant surgery are encouraged to consider supplemental barrier protection for these delicate, expensive and nonsterilizeable sensors to prevent patient cross-contamination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034170843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034170843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 463

EP - 467

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

SN - 0002-8177

IS - 4

ER -