Ahr null alleles: Distinctive or different?

Garet Lahvis, C. A. Bradfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two independent laboratories have generated Ahr 'null' or 'knockout' mice that share some common characteristics but also have distinct phenotypes. In this Commentary, we will discuss our view of the candidate variables that might account for these differences. More importantly, we hope that this discussion can identify important parameters to be assessed by investigators in the process of characterizing their own modified loci. The variables that we have considered include the possibility that different targeting strategies can result in altered products with unsuspected function or that the targeting event itself can alter the function of neighboring genes. Further, genetic background can have an important influence on phenotype, and differences in genome can be introduced during derivation by the type of embryonic stem cells used and by the random segregation of parental genes in the F2 generation of line propagation. In addition, phenotype may be acutely sensitive to environmental variables, such as pathogen and chemical exposure and stress introduced by crowding and disease. Finally, we discuss approaches to resolving differences between null mice and propose a partial solution, the institution of a repository for detailed information on targeted alleles that may not typically be allowed in today's 'fast paced' scientific publications. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)781-787
Number of pages7
JournalBiochemical Pharmacology
Volume56
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genes
Alleles
Phenotype
Crowding
Pathogens
Embryonic Stem Cells
Stem cells
Knockout Mice
Publications
Research Personnel
Genome
Genetic Background

Keywords

  • Cytochrome P450
  • Dioxin receptor
  • Gene targeting
  • Genetic background
  • Knockout mice
  • TCDD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Ahr null alleles : Distinctive or different? / Lahvis, Garet; Bradfield, C. A.

In: Biochemical Pharmacology, Vol. 56, No. 7, 1998, p. 781-787.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lahvis, Garet ; Bradfield, C. A. / Ahr null alleles : Distinctive or different?. In: Biochemical Pharmacology. 1998 ; Vol. 56, No. 7. pp. 781-787.
@article{ce2bf07ae922495996946a98ece9f91e,
title = "Ahr null alleles: Distinctive or different?",
abstract = "Two independent laboratories have generated Ahr 'null' or 'knockout' mice that share some common characteristics but also have distinct phenotypes. In this Commentary, we will discuss our view of the candidate variables that might account for these differences. More importantly, we hope that this discussion can identify important parameters to be assessed by investigators in the process of characterizing their own modified loci. The variables that we have considered include the possibility that different targeting strategies can result in altered products with unsuspected function or that the targeting event itself can alter the function of neighboring genes. Further, genetic background can have an important influence on phenotype, and differences in genome can be introduced during derivation by the type of embryonic stem cells used and by the random segregation of parental genes in the F2 generation of line propagation. In addition, phenotype may be acutely sensitive to environmental variables, such as pathogen and chemical exposure and stress introduced by crowding and disease. Finally, we discuss approaches to resolving differences between null mice and propose a partial solution, the institution of a repository for detailed information on targeted alleles that may not typically be allowed in today's 'fast paced' scientific publications. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.",
keywords = "Cytochrome P450, Dioxin receptor, Gene targeting, Genetic background, Knockout mice, TCDD",
author = "Garet Lahvis and Bradfield, {C. A.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0006-2952(98)00134-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "781--787",
journal = "Biochemical Pharmacology",
issn = "0006-2952",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ahr null alleles

T2 - Distinctive or different?

AU - Lahvis, Garet

AU - Bradfield, C. A.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Two independent laboratories have generated Ahr 'null' or 'knockout' mice that share some common characteristics but also have distinct phenotypes. In this Commentary, we will discuss our view of the candidate variables that might account for these differences. More importantly, we hope that this discussion can identify important parameters to be assessed by investigators in the process of characterizing their own modified loci. The variables that we have considered include the possibility that different targeting strategies can result in altered products with unsuspected function or that the targeting event itself can alter the function of neighboring genes. Further, genetic background can have an important influence on phenotype, and differences in genome can be introduced during derivation by the type of embryonic stem cells used and by the random segregation of parental genes in the F2 generation of line propagation. In addition, phenotype may be acutely sensitive to environmental variables, such as pathogen and chemical exposure and stress introduced by crowding and disease. Finally, we discuss approaches to resolving differences between null mice and propose a partial solution, the institution of a repository for detailed information on targeted alleles that may not typically be allowed in today's 'fast paced' scientific publications. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - Two independent laboratories have generated Ahr 'null' or 'knockout' mice that share some common characteristics but also have distinct phenotypes. In this Commentary, we will discuss our view of the candidate variables that might account for these differences. More importantly, we hope that this discussion can identify important parameters to be assessed by investigators in the process of characterizing their own modified loci. The variables that we have considered include the possibility that different targeting strategies can result in altered products with unsuspected function or that the targeting event itself can alter the function of neighboring genes. Further, genetic background can have an important influence on phenotype, and differences in genome can be introduced during derivation by the type of embryonic stem cells used and by the random segregation of parental genes in the F2 generation of line propagation. In addition, phenotype may be acutely sensitive to environmental variables, such as pathogen and chemical exposure and stress introduced by crowding and disease. Finally, we discuss approaches to resolving differences between null mice and propose a partial solution, the institution of a repository for detailed information on targeted alleles that may not typically be allowed in today's 'fast paced' scientific publications. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.

KW - Cytochrome P450

KW - Dioxin receptor

KW - Gene targeting

KW - Genetic background

KW - Knockout mice

KW - TCDD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031691686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031691686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0006-2952(98)00134-8

DO - 10.1016/S0006-2952(98)00134-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9774139

AN - SCOPUS:0031691686

VL - 56

SP - 781

EP - 787

JO - Biochemical Pharmacology

JF - Biochemical Pharmacology

SN - 0006-2952

IS - 7

ER -