After Oregon's insanity defense

. A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization

Joseph Bloom, Jeffrey L. Rogers, Spero M. Manson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-402
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume5
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Insanity Defense
hospitalization
Psychiatry
Hospitalization
disposition
jurisdiction
human being
community
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Law

Cite this

After Oregon's insanity defense : . A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization. / Bloom, Joseph; Rogers, Jeffrey L.; Manson, Spero M.

In: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 5, No. 3-4, 1982, p. 391-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bloom, Joseph ; Rogers, Jeffrey L. ; Manson, Spero M. / After Oregon's insanity defense : . A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization. In: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 1982 ; Vol. 5, No. 3-4. pp. 391-402.
@article{f08c7cd3300f434e9eaa94da35363efb,
title = "After Oregon's insanity defense: . A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization",
abstract = "This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?",
author = "Joseph Bloom and Rogers, {Jeffrey L.} and Manson, {Spero M.}",
year = "1982",
doi = "10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "391--402",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-2527",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - After Oregon's insanity defense

T2 - . A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization

AU - Bloom, Joseph

AU - Rogers, Jeffrey L.

AU - Manson, Spero M.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?

AB - This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020351588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020351588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2

DO - 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 391

EP - 402

JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

SN - 0160-2527

IS - 3-4

ER -