Achieving high-frequency optical control of synaptic transmission

Skyler Jackman, Brandon M. Beneduce, Iain R. Drew, Wade G. Regehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The optogenetic tool channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) is widely used to excite neurons to study neural circuits. Previous optogenetic studies of synapses suggest that light-evoked synaptic responses often exhibit artificial synaptic depression, which has been attributed to either the inability of ChR2 to reliably fire presynaptic axons or to ChR2 elevating the probability of release by depolarizing presynaptic boutons. Here, we compare light-evoked and electrically evoked synaptic responses for high-frequency stimulation at three synapses in the mouse brain. At synapses from Purkinje cells to deep cerebellar nuclei neurons (PC→DCN), light- and electrically evoked synaptic currents were remarkably similar for ChR2 expressed transgenically or with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expression vectors. For hippocampal CA3→CA1 synapses, AAV expression vectors of serotype 1, 5, and 8 led to light-evoked synaptic currents that depressed much more than electrically evoked currents, even though ChR2 could fire axons reliably at up to 50 Hz. The disparity between optical and electrical stimulation was eliminated when ChR2 was expressed transgenically or with AAV9. For cerebellar granule cell to stellate cell (grc→SC) synapses, AAV1 also led to artificial synaptic depression and AAV9 provided superior performance. Artificial synaptic depression also occurred when stimulating over presynaptic boutons, rather than axons, at CA3→CA1 synapses, but not at PC→DCN synapses. These findings indicate that ChR2 expression methods and light stimulation techniques influence synaptic responses in a neuron-specific manner. They also identify pitfalls associated with using ChR2 to study synapses and suggest an approach that allows optogenetics to be applied in a manner that helps to avoid potential complications

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7704-7714
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume34
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Synaptic Transmission
Synapses
Optogenetics
Light
Axons
Neurons
Cerebellar Nuclei
Dependovirus
Purkinje Cells
Electric Stimulation
Brain

Keywords

  • AAV
  • Channelrhodopsin
  • Optogenetics
  • Short-term plasticity
  • Synapse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Achieving high-frequency optical control of synaptic transmission. / Jackman, Skyler; Beneduce, Brandon M.; Drew, Iain R.; Regehr, Wade G.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 34, No. 22, 01.01.2014, p. 7704-7714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackman, Skyler ; Beneduce, Brandon M. ; Drew, Iain R. ; Regehr, Wade G. / Achieving high-frequency optical control of synaptic transmission. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 22. pp. 7704-7714.
@article{f40977aa1f4d4ae2bdbc26610372c643,
title = "Achieving high-frequency optical control of synaptic transmission",
abstract = "The optogenetic tool channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) is widely used to excite neurons to study neural circuits. Previous optogenetic studies of synapses suggest that light-evoked synaptic responses often exhibit artificial synaptic depression, which has been attributed to either the inability of ChR2 to reliably fire presynaptic axons or to ChR2 elevating the probability of release by depolarizing presynaptic boutons. Here, we compare light-evoked and electrically evoked synaptic responses for high-frequency stimulation at three synapses in the mouse brain. At synapses from Purkinje cells to deep cerebellar nuclei neurons (PC→DCN), light- and electrically evoked synaptic currents were remarkably similar for ChR2 expressed transgenically or with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expression vectors. For hippocampal CA3→CA1 synapses, AAV expression vectors of serotype 1, 5, and 8 led to light-evoked synaptic currents that depressed much more than electrically evoked currents, even though ChR2 could fire axons reliably at up to 50 Hz. The disparity between optical and electrical stimulation was eliminated when ChR2 was expressed transgenically or with AAV9. For cerebellar granule cell to stellate cell (grc→SC) synapses, AAV1 also led to artificial synaptic depression and AAV9 provided superior performance. Artificial synaptic depression also occurred when stimulating over presynaptic boutons, rather than axons, at CA3→CA1 synapses, but not at PC→DCN synapses. These findings indicate that ChR2 expression methods and light stimulation techniques influence synaptic responses in a neuron-specific manner. They also identify pitfalls associated with using ChR2 to study synapses and suggest an approach that allows optogenetics to be applied in a manner that helps to avoid potential complications",
keywords = "AAV, Channelrhodopsin, Optogenetics, Short-term plasticity, Synapse",
author = "Skyler Jackman and Beneduce, {Brandon M.} and Drew, {Iain R.} and Regehr, {Wade G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4694-13.2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "7704--7714",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Achieving high-frequency optical control of synaptic transmission

AU - Jackman, Skyler

AU - Beneduce, Brandon M.

AU - Drew, Iain R.

AU - Regehr, Wade G.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The optogenetic tool channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) is widely used to excite neurons to study neural circuits. Previous optogenetic studies of synapses suggest that light-evoked synaptic responses often exhibit artificial synaptic depression, which has been attributed to either the inability of ChR2 to reliably fire presynaptic axons or to ChR2 elevating the probability of release by depolarizing presynaptic boutons. Here, we compare light-evoked and electrically evoked synaptic responses for high-frequency stimulation at three synapses in the mouse brain. At synapses from Purkinje cells to deep cerebellar nuclei neurons (PC→DCN), light- and electrically evoked synaptic currents were remarkably similar for ChR2 expressed transgenically or with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expression vectors. For hippocampal CA3→CA1 synapses, AAV expression vectors of serotype 1, 5, and 8 led to light-evoked synaptic currents that depressed much more than electrically evoked currents, even though ChR2 could fire axons reliably at up to 50 Hz. The disparity between optical and electrical stimulation was eliminated when ChR2 was expressed transgenically or with AAV9. For cerebellar granule cell to stellate cell (grc→SC) synapses, AAV1 also led to artificial synaptic depression and AAV9 provided superior performance. Artificial synaptic depression also occurred when stimulating over presynaptic boutons, rather than axons, at CA3→CA1 synapses, but not at PC→DCN synapses. These findings indicate that ChR2 expression methods and light stimulation techniques influence synaptic responses in a neuron-specific manner. They also identify pitfalls associated with using ChR2 to study synapses and suggest an approach that allows optogenetics to be applied in a manner that helps to avoid potential complications

AB - The optogenetic tool channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) is widely used to excite neurons to study neural circuits. Previous optogenetic studies of synapses suggest that light-evoked synaptic responses often exhibit artificial synaptic depression, which has been attributed to either the inability of ChR2 to reliably fire presynaptic axons or to ChR2 elevating the probability of release by depolarizing presynaptic boutons. Here, we compare light-evoked and electrically evoked synaptic responses for high-frequency stimulation at three synapses in the mouse brain. At synapses from Purkinje cells to deep cerebellar nuclei neurons (PC→DCN), light- and electrically evoked synaptic currents were remarkably similar for ChR2 expressed transgenically or with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expression vectors. For hippocampal CA3→CA1 synapses, AAV expression vectors of serotype 1, 5, and 8 led to light-evoked synaptic currents that depressed much more than electrically evoked currents, even though ChR2 could fire axons reliably at up to 50 Hz. The disparity between optical and electrical stimulation was eliminated when ChR2 was expressed transgenically or with AAV9. For cerebellar granule cell to stellate cell (grc→SC) synapses, AAV1 also led to artificial synaptic depression and AAV9 provided superior performance. Artificial synaptic depression also occurred when stimulating over presynaptic boutons, rather than axons, at CA3→CA1 synapses, but not at PC→DCN synapses. These findings indicate that ChR2 expression methods and light stimulation techniques influence synaptic responses in a neuron-specific manner. They also identify pitfalls associated with using ChR2 to study synapses and suggest an approach that allows optogenetics to be applied in a manner that helps to avoid potential complications

KW - AAV

KW - Channelrhodopsin

KW - Optogenetics

KW - Short-term plasticity

KW - Synapse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901441064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901441064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4694-13.2014

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4694-13.2014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24872574

AN - SCOPUS:84901441064

VL - 34

SP - 7704

EP - 7714

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 22

ER -