Accuracy of alveolar bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography acquired using varying settings

V. C. Cook, A. M. Timock, Jennifer Crowe, M. Wang, David Covell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. Settings and Sample Population: School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. Materials and Methods: Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT® 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p ≤ 0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. Results: Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17 ± 0.12 (BBH) and 0.10 ± 0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41 ± 0.32 (BBH) and 0.12 ± 0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. Conclusions: Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-136
Number of pages10
JournalOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Volume18
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Zygoma
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Bone and Bones
Cadaver
School Dentistry
Dissection
Tooth
Head
Radiation
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Alveolar bone height
  • Cone beam computed tomography
  • Orthodontics
  • Reliability of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Accuracy of alveolar bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography acquired using varying settings. / Cook, V. C.; Timock, A. M.; Crowe, Jennifer; Wang, M.; Covell, David.

In: Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, Vol. 18, No. S1, 01.04.2015, p. 127-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{304b37f0bf8a4e15a6ce41333305e0bd,
title = "Accuracy of alveolar bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography acquired using varying settings",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. Settings and Sample Population: School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. Materials and Methods: Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT{\circledR} 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p ≤ 0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. Results: Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17 ± 0.12 (BBH) and 0.10 ± 0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41 ± 0.32 (BBH) and 0.12 ± 0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. Conclusions: Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.",
keywords = "Alveolar bone height, Cone beam computed tomography, Orthodontics, Reliability of results",
author = "Cook, {V. C.} and Timock, {A. M.} and Jennifer Crowe and M. Wang and David Covell",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ocr.12072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "127--136",
journal = "Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research",
issn = "1601-6335",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of alveolar bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography acquired using varying settings

AU - Cook, V. C.

AU - Timock, A. M.

AU - Crowe, Jennifer

AU - Wang, M.

AU - Covell, David

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Objectives: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. Settings and Sample Population: School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. Materials and Methods: Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT® 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p ≤ 0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. Results: Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17 ± 0.12 (BBH) and 0.10 ± 0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41 ± 0.32 (BBH) and 0.12 ± 0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. Conclusions: Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.

AB - Objectives: To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. Settings and Sample Population: School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. Materials and Methods: Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT® 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p ≤ 0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. Results: Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17 ± 0.12 (BBH) and 0.10 ± 0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41 ± 0.32 (BBH) and 0.12 ± 0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. Conclusions: Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.

KW - Alveolar bone height

KW - Cone beam computed tomography

KW - Orthodontics

KW - Reliability of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926455513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926455513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ocr.12072

DO - 10.1111/ocr.12072

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

JF - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

SN - 1601-6335

IS - S1

ER -