Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing and enhanced referral to care in Uganda

A factorial randomised controlled trial

Rhoda K. Wanyenze, Moses R. Kamya, Robin Fatch, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza, Steven Baveewo, Gregory Szekeres, David Bangsberg, Thomas Coates, Judith A. Hahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: HIV counselling and testing and linkage to care are crucial for successful HIV prevention and treatment. Abbreviated counselling could save time; however, its effect on HIV risk is uncertain and methods to improve linkage to care have not been studied. Methods: We did this factorial randomised controlled study at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Participants were randomly assigned to abbreviated or traditional HIV counselling and testing; HIV-infected patients were randomly assigned to enhanced linkage to care or standard linkage to care. All study personnel except counsellors and the data officer were masked to study group assignment. Participants had structured interviews, given once every 3 months. We compared sexual risk behaviour by counselling strategy with a 6·5% non-inferiority margin. We used Cox proportional hazards analyses to compare HIV outcomes by linkage to care over 1 year and tested for interaction by sex. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00648232). Findings: We enrolled 3415 participants; 1707 assigned to abbreviated counselling versus 1708 assigned to traditional. Unprotected sex with an HIV discordant or status unknown partner was similar in each group (232/823 [27·9%] vs 251/890 [28·2%], difference -0·3%, one-sided 95% CI 3·2). Loss to follow-up was lower for traditional counselling than for abbreviated counselling (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·61, 95% CI 0·44-0·83). 1003 HIV-positive participants were assigned to enhanced linkage (n=504) or standard linkage to care (n=499). Linkage to care did not have a significant effect on mortality or receipt of co-trimoxazole. Time to treatment in men with CD4 cell counts of 250 cells per μL or fewer was lower for enhanced linkage versus standard linkage (adjusted HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·41-0·87) and time to HIV care was decreased among women (0·80, 0·66-0·96). Interpretation: Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing did not adversely affect risk behaviour. Linkage to care interventions might decrease time to enrolment in HIV care and antiretroviral treatment and thus might affect secondary HIV transmission and improve treatment outcomes. Funding: US National Institute of Mental Health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalThe Lancet Global Health
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Uganda
Counseling
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
HIV
Risk-Taking
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Unsafe Sex
Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination Trimethoprim
Standard of Care
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Sexual Behavior
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing and enhanced referral to care in Uganda : A factorial randomised controlled trial. / Wanyenze, Rhoda K.; Kamya, Moses R.; Fatch, Robin; Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet; Baveewo, Steven; Szekeres, Gregory; Bangsberg, David; Coates, Thomas; Hahn, Judith A.

In: The Lancet Global Health, Vol. 1, No. 3, 09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wanyenze, Rhoda K. ; Kamya, Moses R. ; Fatch, Robin ; Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet ; Baveewo, Steven ; Szekeres, Gregory ; Bangsberg, David ; Coates, Thomas ; Hahn, Judith A. / Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing and enhanced referral to care in Uganda : A factorial randomised controlled trial. In: The Lancet Global Health. 2013 ; Vol. 1, No. 3.
@article{597684a1826b40a286e4c3c400b5c34c,
title = "Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing and enhanced referral to care in Uganda: A factorial randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: HIV counselling and testing and linkage to care are crucial for successful HIV prevention and treatment. Abbreviated counselling could save time; however, its effect on HIV risk is uncertain and methods to improve linkage to care have not been studied. Methods: We did this factorial randomised controlled study at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Participants were randomly assigned to abbreviated or traditional HIV counselling and testing; HIV-infected patients were randomly assigned to enhanced linkage to care or standard linkage to care. All study personnel except counsellors and the data officer were masked to study group assignment. Participants had structured interviews, given once every 3 months. We compared sexual risk behaviour by counselling strategy with a 6·5{\%} non-inferiority margin. We used Cox proportional hazards analyses to compare HIV outcomes by linkage to care over 1 year and tested for interaction by sex. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00648232). Findings: We enrolled 3415 participants; 1707 assigned to abbreviated counselling versus 1708 assigned to traditional. Unprotected sex with an HIV discordant or status unknown partner was similar in each group (232/823 [27·9{\%}] vs 251/890 [28·2{\%}], difference -0·3{\%}, one-sided 95{\%} CI 3·2). Loss to follow-up was lower for traditional counselling than for abbreviated counselling (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·61, 95{\%} CI 0·44-0·83). 1003 HIV-positive participants were assigned to enhanced linkage (n=504) or standard linkage to care (n=499). Linkage to care did not have a significant effect on mortality or receipt of co-trimoxazole. Time to treatment in men with CD4 cell counts of 250 cells per μL or fewer was lower for enhanced linkage versus standard linkage (adjusted HR 0·60, 95{\%} CI 0·41-0·87) and time to HIV care was decreased among women (0·80, 0·66-0·96). Interpretation: Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing did not adversely affect risk behaviour. Linkage to care interventions might decrease time to enrolment in HIV care and antiretroviral treatment and thus might affect secondary HIV transmission and improve treatment outcomes. Funding: US National Institute of Mental Health.",
author = "Wanyenze, {Rhoda K.} and Kamya, {Moses R.} and Robin Fatch and Harriet Mayanja-Kizza and Steven Baveewo and Gregory Szekeres and David Bangsberg and Thomas Coates and Hahn, {Judith A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70067-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "The Lancet Global Health",
issn = "2214-109X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing and enhanced referral to care in Uganda

T2 - A factorial randomised controlled trial

AU - Wanyenze, Rhoda K.

AU - Kamya, Moses R.

AU - Fatch, Robin

AU - Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet

AU - Baveewo, Steven

AU - Szekeres, Gregory

AU - Bangsberg, David

AU - Coates, Thomas

AU - Hahn, Judith A.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background: HIV counselling and testing and linkage to care are crucial for successful HIV prevention and treatment. Abbreviated counselling could save time; however, its effect on HIV risk is uncertain and methods to improve linkage to care have not been studied. Methods: We did this factorial randomised controlled study at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Participants were randomly assigned to abbreviated or traditional HIV counselling and testing; HIV-infected patients were randomly assigned to enhanced linkage to care or standard linkage to care. All study personnel except counsellors and the data officer were masked to study group assignment. Participants had structured interviews, given once every 3 months. We compared sexual risk behaviour by counselling strategy with a 6·5% non-inferiority margin. We used Cox proportional hazards analyses to compare HIV outcomes by linkage to care over 1 year and tested for interaction by sex. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00648232). Findings: We enrolled 3415 participants; 1707 assigned to abbreviated counselling versus 1708 assigned to traditional. Unprotected sex with an HIV discordant or status unknown partner was similar in each group (232/823 [27·9%] vs 251/890 [28·2%], difference -0·3%, one-sided 95% CI 3·2). Loss to follow-up was lower for traditional counselling than for abbreviated counselling (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·61, 95% CI 0·44-0·83). 1003 HIV-positive participants were assigned to enhanced linkage (n=504) or standard linkage to care (n=499). Linkage to care did not have a significant effect on mortality or receipt of co-trimoxazole. Time to treatment in men with CD4 cell counts of 250 cells per μL or fewer was lower for enhanced linkage versus standard linkage (adjusted HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·41-0·87) and time to HIV care was decreased among women (0·80, 0·66-0·96). Interpretation: Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing did not adversely affect risk behaviour. Linkage to care interventions might decrease time to enrolment in HIV care and antiretroviral treatment and thus might affect secondary HIV transmission and improve treatment outcomes. Funding: US National Institute of Mental Health.

AB - Background: HIV counselling and testing and linkage to care are crucial for successful HIV prevention and treatment. Abbreviated counselling could save time; however, its effect on HIV risk is uncertain and methods to improve linkage to care have not been studied. Methods: We did this factorial randomised controlled study at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Participants were randomly assigned to abbreviated or traditional HIV counselling and testing; HIV-infected patients were randomly assigned to enhanced linkage to care or standard linkage to care. All study personnel except counsellors and the data officer were masked to study group assignment. Participants had structured interviews, given once every 3 months. We compared sexual risk behaviour by counselling strategy with a 6·5% non-inferiority margin. We used Cox proportional hazards analyses to compare HIV outcomes by linkage to care over 1 year and tested for interaction by sex. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00648232). Findings: We enrolled 3415 participants; 1707 assigned to abbreviated counselling versus 1708 assigned to traditional. Unprotected sex with an HIV discordant or status unknown partner was similar in each group (232/823 [27·9%] vs 251/890 [28·2%], difference -0·3%, one-sided 95% CI 3·2). Loss to follow-up was lower for traditional counselling than for abbreviated counselling (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·61, 95% CI 0·44-0·83). 1003 HIV-positive participants were assigned to enhanced linkage (n=504) or standard linkage to care (n=499). Linkage to care did not have a significant effect on mortality or receipt of co-trimoxazole. Time to treatment in men with CD4 cell counts of 250 cells per μL or fewer was lower for enhanced linkage versus standard linkage (adjusted HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·41-0·87) and time to HIV care was decreased among women (0·80, 0·66-0·96). Interpretation: Abbreviated HIV counselling and testing did not adversely affect risk behaviour. Linkage to care interventions might decrease time to enrolment in HIV care and antiretroviral treatment and thus might affect secondary HIV transmission and improve treatment outcomes. Funding: US National Institute of Mental Health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886592082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886592082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70067-6

DO - 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70067-6

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - The Lancet Global Health

JF - The Lancet Global Health

SN - 2214-109X

IS - 3

ER -