A view from Cheyenne Mountain: Generation III's perspective of Keystone III

Erika Bliss, Kara Cadwallader, Terrence E. Steyer, Deborah S. Clements, Jennifer Devoe, Kenneth Fink, Marina Khubesrian, Paul Lyons, Elizabeth Steiner, David Weismiller

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In October 2000 the family of family medicine convened the Keystone III conference at Cheyenne Mountain Resort. Keystone III participants included members of Generation I (entered practice before 1970), Generation II (entered 1970- 1990), and Generation III (entered after 1990). They represented a wide range of family physicians, from medical students to founders of the discipline, and from small-town solo practice to academic medicine. During the conference, the three generations worked together and separately thinking about the past, present, and future of family medicine, our roles in it, and how the understanding of a family physician and our discipline had and would continue to evolve. After the conference, the 10 Generation III members wrote the article published here, reflecting on our experiences as new physicians and physicians in training, and the similarities and differences between our experiences and those of physicians in Generations I and II. Key similarities included commitment to whole-person care, to a wide scope of practice, to community health, and to ongoing engagement with our discipline. Key differences included our understanding of availability, the need for work-life balance, the role of technology in the physician-patient relationship, and the perceptions of the relationship between medicine and a range of outside forces such as insurance and government. This article, presented with only minor edits, thus reflects accurately our perceptions in late 2000. The accompanying editorial reflects our current perspective.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)75-78
    Number of pages4
    JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
    Volume12
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2014

    Fingerprint

    Medicine
    Family Physicians
    Physicians
    Physician-Patient Relations
    Private Practice
    Insurance
    Medical Students
    Technology
    Health

    Keywords

    • Delivery of health care
    • Family medicine
    • Family practice
    • History of medicine

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Family Practice

    Cite this

    Bliss, E., Cadwallader, K., Steyer, T. E., Clements, D. S., Devoe, J., Fink, K., ... Weismiller, D. (2014). A view from Cheyenne Mountain: Generation III's perspective of Keystone III. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(1), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1606

    A view from Cheyenne Mountain : Generation III's perspective of Keystone III. / Bliss, Erika; Cadwallader, Kara; Steyer, Terrence E.; Clements, Deborah S.; Devoe, Jennifer; Fink, Kenneth; Khubesrian, Marina; Lyons, Paul; Steiner, Elizabeth; Weismiller, David.

    In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 75-78.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bliss, E, Cadwallader, K, Steyer, TE, Clements, DS, Devoe, J, Fink, K, Khubesrian, M, Lyons, P, Steiner, E & Weismiller, D 2014, 'A view from Cheyenne Mountain: Generation III's perspective of Keystone III', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1606
    Bliss, Erika ; Cadwallader, Kara ; Steyer, Terrence E. ; Clements, Deborah S. ; Devoe, Jennifer ; Fink, Kenneth ; Khubesrian, Marina ; Lyons, Paul ; Steiner, Elizabeth ; Weismiller, David. / A view from Cheyenne Mountain : Generation III's perspective of Keystone III. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 75-78.
    @article{dd092b28e81d45ecaf4bfee9a8608b86,
    title = "A view from Cheyenne Mountain: Generation III's perspective of Keystone III",
    abstract = "In October 2000 the family of family medicine convened the Keystone III conference at Cheyenne Mountain Resort. Keystone III participants included members of Generation I (entered practice before 1970), Generation II (entered 1970- 1990), and Generation III (entered after 1990). They represented a wide range of family physicians, from medical students to founders of the discipline, and from small-town solo practice to academic medicine. During the conference, the three generations worked together and separately thinking about the past, present, and future of family medicine, our roles in it, and how the understanding of a family physician and our discipline had and would continue to evolve. After the conference, the 10 Generation III members wrote the article published here, reflecting on our experiences as new physicians and physicians in training, and the similarities and differences between our experiences and those of physicians in Generations I and II. Key similarities included commitment to whole-person care, to a wide scope of practice, to community health, and to ongoing engagement with our discipline. Key differences included our understanding of availability, the need for work-life balance, the role of technology in the physician-patient relationship, and the perceptions of the relationship between medicine and a range of outside forces such as insurance and government. This article, presented with only minor edits, thus reflects accurately our perceptions in late 2000. The accompanying editorial reflects our current perspective.",
    keywords = "Delivery of health care, Family medicine, Family practice, History of medicine",
    author = "Erika Bliss and Kara Cadwallader and Steyer, {Terrence E.} and Clements, {Deborah S.} and Jennifer Devoe and Kenneth Fink and Marina Khubesrian and Paul Lyons and Elizabeth Steiner and David Weismiller",
    year = "2014",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1370/afm.1606",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "75--78",
    journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
    issn = "1544-1709",
    publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A view from Cheyenne Mountain

    T2 - Generation III's perspective of Keystone III

    AU - Bliss, Erika

    AU - Cadwallader, Kara

    AU - Steyer, Terrence E.

    AU - Clements, Deborah S.

    AU - Devoe, Jennifer

    AU - Fink, Kenneth

    AU - Khubesrian, Marina

    AU - Lyons, Paul

    AU - Steiner, Elizabeth

    AU - Weismiller, David

    PY - 2014/1

    Y1 - 2014/1

    N2 - In October 2000 the family of family medicine convened the Keystone III conference at Cheyenne Mountain Resort. Keystone III participants included members of Generation I (entered practice before 1970), Generation II (entered 1970- 1990), and Generation III (entered after 1990). They represented a wide range of family physicians, from medical students to founders of the discipline, and from small-town solo practice to academic medicine. During the conference, the three generations worked together and separately thinking about the past, present, and future of family medicine, our roles in it, and how the understanding of a family physician and our discipline had and would continue to evolve. After the conference, the 10 Generation III members wrote the article published here, reflecting on our experiences as new physicians and physicians in training, and the similarities and differences between our experiences and those of physicians in Generations I and II. Key similarities included commitment to whole-person care, to a wide scope of practice, to community health, and to ongoing engagement with our discipline. Key differences included our understanding of availability, the need for work-life balance, the role of technology in the physician-patient relationship, and the perceptions of the relationship between medicine and a range of outside forces such as insurance and government. This article, presented with only minor edits, thus reflects accurately our perceptions in late 2000. The accompanying editorial reflects our current perspective.

    AB - In October 2000 the family of family medicine convened the Keystone III conference at Cheyenne Mountain Resort. Keystone III participants included members of Generation I (entered practice before 1970), Generation II (entered 1970- 1990), and Generation III (entered after 1990). They represented a wide range of family physicians, from medical students to founders of the discipline, and from small-town solo practice to academic medicine. During the conference, the three generations worked together and separately thinking about the past, present, and future of family medicine, our roles in it, and how the understanding of a family physician and our discipline had and would continue to evolve. After the conference, the 10 Generation III members wrote the article published here, reflecting on our experiences as new physicians and physicians in training, and the similarities and differences between our experiences and those of physicians in Generations I and II. Key similarities included commitment to whole-person care, to a wide scope of practice, to community health, and to ongoing engagement with our discipline. Key differences included our understanding of availability, the need for work-life balance, the role of technology in the physician-patient relationship, and the perceptions of the relationship between medicine and a range of outside forces such as insurance and government. This article, presented with only minor edits, thus reflects accurately our perceptions in late 2000. The accompanying editorial reflects our current perspective.

    KW - Delivery of health care

    KW - Family medicine

    KW - Family practice

    KW - History of medicine

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892774064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892774064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1370/afm.1606

    DO - 10.1370/afm.1606

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 24445106

    AN - SCOPUS:84892774064

    VL - 12

    SP - 75

    EP - 78

    JO - Annals of Family Medicine

    JF - Annals of Family Medicine

    SN - 1544-1709

    IS - 1

    ER -