A survey of the practice of lead extraction in the United States

Charles Henrikson, Karl Zhang, Jeffrey A. Brinker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endovascular lead extraction is an important component of the management of patients with chronically implanted arrhythmia control devices. Although it is associated with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, there is little information about its scope and practice. Methods: We surveyed 1,000 physician members of the Heart Rhythm Society via e-mail solicitation. Results: Of the 252 respondents (25%), 221 (88%) reported either performing extractions themselves (63%), or having privileges at a hospital where extractions are performed (25%). Electrophysiologists perform extractions at most sites (83%) but cardiac surgeons perform endovascular lead extraction at a significant minority of sites (20%). Most respondents report low annual volumes of extractions at their site: 15% reported 50 procedures/year. Thirty-six percent of respondents reported that extractions were done in the operating room (OR) with surgeon present or immediately available, 39% in the electrophysiology (EP) lab with surgeon and OR identified and available, and 25% in EP lab without a surgeon or OR identified. The overall risks of lead extraction were felt to be 1-5% of major complication and 0.5-1% of mortality, roughly in line with published data. Conclusions: While there is agreement as to the risk of major complication and death from lead extraction, the degree of surgical availability varies considerably. The new guidelines document recommends the ability to promptly initiate an emergent surgical procedure, and this should be an important goal for all extractionists. (PACE 2010; 33:721-726).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)721-726
Number of pages6
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Electrophysiology
Annual Reports
Mortality
Postal Service
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Guidelines
Morbidity
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
Surgeons
Lead
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Defibrillation - ICD
  • Pacing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A survey of the practice of lead extraction in the United States. / Henrikson, Charles; Zhang, Karl; Brinker, Jeffrey A.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2010, p. 721-726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23dfbf2bd23f41ada67356df658ef307,
title = "A survey of the practice of lead extraction in the United States",
abstract = "Background: Endovascular lead extraction is an important component of the management of patients with chronically implanted arrhythmia control devices. Although it is associated with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, there is little information about its scope and practice. Methods: We surveyed 1,000 physician members of the Heart Rhythm Society via e-mail solicitation. Results: Of the 252 respondents (25{\%}), 221 (88{\%}) reported either performing extractions themselves (63{\%}), or having privileges at a hospital where extractions are performed (25{\%}). Electrophysiologists perform extractions at most sites (83{\%}) but cardiac surgeons perform endovascular lead extraction at a significant minority of sites (20{\%}). Most respondents report low annual volumes of extractions at their site: 15{\%} reported 50 procedures/year. Thirty-six percent of respondents reported that extractions were done in the operating room (OR) with surgeon present or immediately available, 39{\%} in the electrophysiology (EP) lab with surgeon and OR identified and available, and 25{\%} in EP lab without a surgeon or OR identified. The overall risks of lead extraction were felt to be 1-5{\%} of major complication and 0.5-1{\%} of mortality, roughly in line with published data. Conclusions: While there is agreement as to the risk of major complication and death from lead extraction, the degree of surgical availability varies considerably. The new guidelines document recommends the ability to promptly initiate an emergent surgical procedure, and this should be an important goal for all extractionists. (PACE 2010; 33:721-726).",
keywords = "Defibrillation - ICD, Pacing",
author = "Charles Henrikson and Karl Zhang and Brinker, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02692.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "721--726",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of the practice of lead extraction in the United States

AU - Henrikson, Charles

AU - Zhang, Karl

AU - Brinker, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background: Endovascular lead extraction is an important component of the management of patients with chronically implanted arrhythmia control devices. Although it is associated with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, there is little information about its scope and practice. Methods: We surveyed 1,000 physician members of the Heart Rhythm Society via e-mail solicitation. Results: Of the 252 respondents (25%), 221 (88%) reported either performing extractions themselves (63%), or having privileges at a hospital where extractions are performed (25%). Electrophysiologists perform extractions at most sites (83%) but cardiac surgeons perform endovascular lead extraction at a significant minority of sites (20%). Most respondents report low annual volumes of extractions at their site: 15% reported 50 procedures/year. Thirty-six percent of respondents reported that extractions were done in the operating room (OR) with surgeon present or immediately available, 39% in the electrophysiology (EP) lab with surgeon and OR identified and available, and 25% in EP lab without a surgeon or OR identified. The overall risks of lead extraction were felt to be 1-5% of major complication and 0.5-1% of mortality, roughly in line with published data. Conclusions: While there is agreement as to the risk of major complication and death from lead extraction, the degree of surgical availability varies considerably. The new guidelines document recommends the ability to promptly initiate an emergent surgical procedure, and this should be an important goal for all extractionists. (PACE 2010; 33:721-726).

AB - Background: Endovascular lead extraction is an important component of the management of patients with chronically implanted arrhythmia control devices. Although it is associated with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, there is little information about its scope and practice. Methods: We surveyed 1,000 physician members of the Heart Rhythm Society via e-mail solicitation. Results: Of the 252 respondents (25%), 221 (88%) reported either performing extractions themselves (63%), or having privileges at a hospital where extractions are performed (25%). Electrophysiologists perform extractions at most sites (83%) but cardiac surgeons perform endovascular lead extraction at a significant minority of sites (20%). Most respondents report low annual volumes of extractions at their site: 15% reported 50 procedures/year. Thirty-six percent of respondents reported that extractions were done in the operating room (OR) with surgeon present or immediately available, 39% in the electrophysiology (EP) lab with surgeon and OR identified and available, and 25% in EP lab without a surgeon or OR identified. The overall risks of lead extraction were felt to be 1-5% of major complication and 0.5-1% of mortality, roughly in line with published data. Conclusions: While there is agreement as to the risk of major complication and death from lead extraction, the degree of surgical availability varies considerably. The new guidelines document recommends the ability to promptly initiate an emergent surgical procedure, and this should be an important goal for all extractionists. (PACE 2010; 33:721-726).

KW - Defibrillation - ICD

KW - Pacing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953184309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953184309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02692.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02692.x

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 721

EP - 726

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 6

ER -