A Randomized Control Trial: Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training

Gabrielle Saunders, Sherri L. Smith, Theresa H. Chisolm, Melissa T. Frederick, Rachel A. McArdle, Richard H. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program as a supplement to standard-of-care hearing aid intervention in a Veteran population. Design: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare outcomes following standard-of-care hearing aid intervention supplemented with (1) LACE training using the 10-session DVD format, (2) LACE training using the 20-session computer-based format, (3) placebo auditory training (AT) consisting of actively listening to 10 hr of digitized books on a computer, and (4) educational counseling - the control group. The study involved 3 VA sites and enrolled 279 veterans. Both new and experienced hearing aid users participated to determine if outcomes differed as a function of hearing aid user status. Data for five behavioral and two self-report measures were collected during three research visits: baseline, immediately following the intervention period, and at 6 months postintervention. The five behavioral measures were selected to determine whether the perceptual and cognitive skills targeted in LACE training generalized to untrained tasks that required similar underlying skills. The two self-report measures were completed to determine whether the training resulted in a lessening of activity limitations and participation restrictions. Outcomes were obtained from 263 participants immediately following the intervention period and from 243 participants 6 months postintervention. Analyses of covariance comparing performance on each outcome measure separately were conducted using intervention and hearing aid user status as between-subject factors, visit as a within-subject factor, and baseline performance as a covariate. Results: No statistically significant main effects or interactions were found for the use of LACE on any outcome measure. Conclusions: Findings from this randomized controlled trial show that LACE training does not result in improved outcomes over standard-of-care hearing aid intervention alone. Potential benefits of AT may be different than those assessed by the performance and self-report measures utilized here. Individual differences not assessed in this study should be examined to evaluate whether AT with LACE has any benefits for particular individuals. Clinically, these findings suggest that audiologists may want to temper the expectations of their patients who embark on LACE training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-396
Number of pages16
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hearing Aids
Communication
Standard of Care
Self Report
Veterans
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Individuality
Counseling
Placebos
Control Groups
Research

Keywords

  • Auditory perception
  • Auditory training
  • Hearing
  • Hearing aids
  • Hearing rehabilitation
  • Neuroplasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

A Randomized Control Trial : Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training. / Saunders, Gabrielle; Smith, Sherri L.; Chisolm, Theresa H.; Frederick, Melissa T.; McArdle, Rachel A.; Wilson, Richard H.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 381-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saunders, Gabrielle ; Smith, Sherri L. ; Chisolm, Theresa H. ; Frederick, Melissa T. ; McArdle, Rachel A. ; Wilson, Richard H. / A Randomized Control Trial : Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training. In: Ear and Hearing. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 381-396.
@article{0cfcdba8a8b34676b7e7b66bfc4f652e,
title = "A Randomized Control Trial: Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the effectiveness of the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program as a supplement to standard-of-care hearing aid intervention in a Veteran population. Design: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare outcomes following standard-of-care hearing aid intervention supplemented with (1) LACE training using the 10-session DVD format, (2) LACE training using the 20-session computer-based format, (3) placebo auditory training (AT) consisting of actively listening to 10 hr of digitized books on a computer, and (4) educational counseling - the control group. The study involved 3 VA sites and enrolled 279 veterans. Both new and experienced hearing aid users participated to determine if outcomes differed as a function of hearing aid user status. Data for five behavioral and two self-report measures were collected during three research visits: baseline, immediately following the intervention period, and at 6 months postintervention. The five behavioral measures were selected to determine whether the perceptual and cognitive skills targeted in LACE training generalized to untrained tasks that required similar underlying skills. The two self-report measures were completed to determine whether the training resulted in a lessening of activity limitations and participation restrictions. Outcomes were obtained from 263 participants immediately following the intervention period and from 243 participants 6 months postintervention. Analyses of covariance comparing performance on each outcome measure separately were conducted using intervention and hearing aid user status as between-subject factors, visit as a within-subject factor, and baseline performance as a covariate. Results: No statistically significant main effects or interactions were found for the use of LACE on any outcome measure. Conclusions: Findings from this randomized controlled trial show that LACE training does not result in improved outcomes over standard-of-care hearing aid intervention alone. Potential benefits of AT may be different than those assessed by the performance and self-report measures utilized here. Individual differences not assessed in this study should be examined to evaluate whether AT with LACE has any benefits for particular individuals. Clinically, these findings suggest that audiologists may want to temper the expectations of their patients who embark on LACE training.",
keywords = "Auditory perception, Auditory training, Hearing, Hearing aids, Hearing rehabilitation, Neuroplasticity",
author = "Gabrielle Saunders and Smith, {Sherri L.} and Chisolm, {Theresa H.} and Frederick, {Melissa T.} and McArdle, {Rachel A.} and Wilson, {Richard H.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AUD.0000000000000283",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "381--396",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Randomized Control Trial

T2 - Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training

AU - Saunders, Gabrielle

AU - Smith, Sherri L.

AU - Chisolm, Theresa H.

AU - Frederick, Melissa T.

AU - McArdle, Rachel A.

AU - Wilson, Richard H.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Objective: To examine the effectiveness of the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program as a supplement to standard-of-care hearing aid intervention in a Veteran population. Design: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare outcomes following standard-of-care hearing aid intervention supplemented with (1) LACE training using the 10-session DVD format, (2) LACE training using the 20-session computer-based format, (3) placebo auditory training (AT) consisting of actively listening to 10 hr of digitized books on a computer, and (4) educational counseling - the control group. The study involved 3 VA sites and enrolled 279 veterans. Both new and experienced hearing aid users participated to determine if outcomes differed as a function of hearing aid user status. Data for five behavioral and two self-report measures were collected during three research visits: baseline, immediately following the intervention period, and at 6 months postintervention. The five behavioral measures were selected to determine whether the perceptual and cognitive skills targeted in LACE training generalized to untrained tasks that required similar underlying skills. The two self-report measures were completed to determine whether the training resulted in a lessening of activity limitations and participation restrictions. Outcomes were obtained from 263 participants immediately following the intervention period and from 243 participants 6 months postintervention. Analyses of covariance comparing performance on each outcome measure separately were conducted using intervention and hearing aid user status as between-subject factors, visit as a within-subject factor, and baseline performance as a covariate. Results: No statistically significant main effects or interactions were found for the use of LACE on any outcome measure. Conclusions: Findings from this randomized controlled trial show that LACE training does not result in improved outcomes over standard-of-care hearing aid intervention alone. Potential benefits of AT may be different than those assessed by the performance and self-report measures utilized here. Individual differences not assessed in this study should be examined to evaluate whether AT with LACE has any benefits for particular individuals. Clinically, these findings suggest that audiologists may want to temper the expectations of their patients who embark on LACE training.

AB - Objective: To examine the effectiveness of the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program as a supplement to standard-of-care hearing aid intervention in a Veteran population. Design: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare outcomes following standard-of-care hearing aid intervention supplemented with (1) LACE training using the 10-session DVD format, (2) LACE training using the 20-session computer-based format, (3) placebo auditory training (AT) consisting of actively listening to 10 hr of digitized books on a computer, and (4) educational counseling - the control group. The study involved 3 VA sites and enrolled 279 veterans. Both new and experienced hearing aid users participated to determine if outcomes differed as a function of hearing aid user status. Data for five behavioral and two self-report measures were collected during three research visits: baseline, immediately following the intervention period, and at 6 months postintervention. The five behavioral measures were selected to determine whether the perceptual and cognitive skills targeted in LACE training generalized to untrained tasks that required similar underlying skills. The two self-report measures were completed to determine whether the training resulted in a lessening of activity limitations and participation restrictions. Outcomes were obtained from 263 participants immediately following the intervention period and from 243 participants 6 months postintervention. Analyses of covariance comparing performance on each outcome measure separately were conducted using intervention and hearing aid user status as between-subject factors, visit as a within-subject factor, and baseline performance as a covariate. Results: No statistically significant main effects or interactions were found for the use of LACE on any outcome measure. Conclusions: Findings from this randomized controlled trial show that LACE training does not result in improved outcomes over standard-of-care hearing aid intervention alone. Potential benefits of AT may be different than those assessed by the performance and self-report measures utilized here. Individual differences not assessed in this study should be examined to evaluate whether AT with LACE has any benefits for particular individuals. Clinically, these findings suggest that audiologists may want to temper the expectations of their patients who embark on LACE training.

KW - Auditory perception

KW - Auditory training

KW - Hearing

KW - Hearing aids

KW - Hearing rehabilitation

KW - Neuroplasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959147570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959147570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000283

DO - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000283

M3 - Article

C2 - 26901263

AN - SCOPUS:84959147570

VL - 37

SP - 381

EP - 396

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 4

ER -