A geospatial assessment of transport distance and survival to discharge in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients: Implications for resuscitation centers

Michael T. Cudnik, Robert H. Schmicker, Christian Vaillancourt, Craig Newgard, James M. Christenson, Daniel P. Davis, Robert (Bob) Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: National leaders have suggested that patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) may benefit from transport to specialized hospitals. We sought to assess the survival of OOHCA patients by transport distance and hospital proximity. Methods: Prospective, cohort study of OOHCA patients in 11 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites across North America. Transport distance and hospital proximity was calculated using weighted centroid of census tract location by Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Patients were stratified into quartiles based on transport distance to the receiving hospital calculated via GIS. Descriptive statistics were used to describe characteristics by transport distance and to compare proximity to other hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of transport distance on survival. Results: 26,628 patients were identified, 7540 (28%) were transported by EMS and included in the final analysis. The median transport time was 6.3. min (IQR 5.4); the median transport distance being 2.4. miles (3.9. km). Most patients were taken to the closest hospital (71.7%; N=5412). However, unadjusted survival to discharge was lower for those taken to the closest compared to further hospitals (12.1% vs. 16.5%) despite similar patient characteristics. Transport distance was not associated with survival on logistic analysis (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01). Conclusions: Survival to discharge was higher in OOHCA patients taken to hospitals located further than the closest hospital while transport distance was not associated with survival. This suggests that longer transport distance/time might not adversely affect outcome. Further studies are needed to inform policy decisions regarding best destination post-cardiac arrest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)518-523
Number of pages6
JournalResuscitation
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Resuscitation
Survival
Geographic Information Systems
Censuses
North America
Heart Arrest
Cohort Studies
Logistic Models
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Out of hospital
  • Outcomes
  • Resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A geospatial assessment of transport distance and survival to discharge in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients : Implications for resuscitation centers. / Cudnik, Michael T.; Schmicker, Robert H.; Vaillancourt, Christian; Newgard, Craig; Christenson, James M.; Davis, Daniel P.; Lowe, Robert (Bob).

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 81, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 518-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cudnik, Michael T. ; Schmicker, Robert H. ; Vaillancourt, Christian ; Newgard, Craig ; Christenson, James M. ; Davis, Daniel P. ; Lowe, Robert (Bob). / A geospatial assessment of transport distance and survival to discharge in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients : Implications for resuscitation centers. In: Resuscitation. 2010 ; Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 518-523.
@article{93f393b97ce04f419249ed3a7311626b,
title = "A geospatial assessment of transport distance and survival to discharge in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients: Implications for resuscitation centers",
abstract = "Objectives: National leaders have suggested that patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) may benefit from transport to specialized hospitals. We sought to assess the survival of OOHCA patients by transport distance and hospital proximity. Methods: Prospective, cohort study of OOHCA patients in 11 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites across North America. Transport distance and hospital proximity was calculated using weighted centroid of census tract location by Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Patients were stratified into quartiles based on transport distance to the receiving hospital calculated via GIS. Descriptive statistics were used to describe characteristics by transport distance and to compare proximity to other hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of transport distance on survival. Results: 26,628 patients were identified, 7540 (28{\%}) were transported by EMS and included in the final analysis. The median transport time was 6.3. min (IQR 5.4); the median transport distance being 2.4. miles (3.9. km). Most patients were taken to the closest hospital (71.7{\%}; N=5412). However, unadjusted survival to discharge was lower for those taken to the closest compared to further hospitals (12.1{\%} vs. 16.5{\%}) despite similar patient characteristics. Transport distance was not associated with survival on logistic analysis (OR 1.00; 95{\%} CI 0.99-1.01). Conclusions: Survival to discharge was higher in OOHCA patients taken to hospitals located further than the closest hospital while transport distance was not associated with survival. This suggests that longer transport distance/time might not adversely affect outcome. Further studies are needed to inform policy decisions regarding best destination post-cardiac arrest.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Out of hospital, Outcomes, Resuscitation",
author = "Cudnik, {Michael T.} and Schmicker, {Robert H.} and Christian Vaillancourt and Craig Newgard and Christenson, {James M.} and Davis, {Daniel P.} and Lowe, {Robert (Bob)}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "518--523",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A geospatial assessment of transport distance and survival to discharge in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients

T2 - Implications for resuscitation centers

AU - Cudnik, Michael T.

AU - Schmicker, Robert H.

AU - Vaillancourt, Christian

AU - Newgard, Craig

AU - Christenson, James M.

AU - Davis, Daniel P.

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Objectives: National leaders have suggested that patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) may benefit from transport to specialized hospitals. We sought to assess the survival of OOHCA patients by transport distance and hospital proximity. Methods: Prospective, cohort study of OOHCA patients in 11 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites across North America. Transport distance and hospital proximity was calculated using weighted centroid of census tract location by Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Patients were stratified into quartiles based on transport distance to the receiving hospital calculated via GIS. Descriptive statistics were used to describe characteristics by transport distance and to compare proximity to other hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of transport distance on survival. Results: 26,628 patients were identified, 7540 (28%) were transported by EMS and included in the final analysis. The median transport time was 6.3. min (IQR 5.4); the median transport distance being 2.4. miles (3.9. km). Most patients were taken to the closest hospital (71.7%; N=5412). However, unadjusted survival to discharge was lower for those taken to the closest compared to further hospitals (12.1% vs. 16.5%) despite similar patient characteristics. Transport distance was not associated with survival on logistic analysis (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01). Conclusions: Survival to discharge was higher in OOHCA patients taken to hospitals located further than the closest hospital while transport distance was not associated with survival. This suggests that longer transport distance/time might not adversely affect outcome. Further studies are needed to inform policy decisions regarding best destination post-cardiac arrest.

AB - Objectives: National leaders have suggested that patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) may benefit from transport to specialized hospitals. We sought to assess the survival of OOHCA patients by transport distance and hospital proximity. Methods: Prospective, cohort study of OOHCA patients in 11 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites across North America. Transport distance and hospital proximity was calculated using weighted centroid of census tract location by Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Patients were stratified into quartiles based on transport distance to the receiving hospital calculated via GIS. Descriptive statistics were used to describe characteristics by transport distance and to compare proximity to other hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of transport distance on survival. Results: 26,628 patients were identified, 7540 (28%) were transported by EMS and included in the final analysis. The median transport time was 6.3. min (IQR 5.4); the median transport distance being 2.4. miles (3.9. km). Most patients were taken to the closest hospital (71.7%; N=5412). However, unadjusted survival to discharge was lower for those taken to the closest compared to further hospitals (12.1% vs. 16.5%) despite similar patient characteristics. Transport distance was not associated with survival on logistic analysis (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01). Conclusions: Survival to discharge was higher in OOHCA patients taken to hospitals located further than the closest hospital while transport distance was not associated with survival. This suggests that longer transport distance/time might not adversely affect outcome. Further studies are needed to inform policy decisions regarding best destination post-cardiac arrest.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Out of hospital

KW - Outcomes

KW - Resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951652726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951652726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.030

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 20122779

AN - SCOPUS:77951652726

VL - 81

SP - 518

EP - 523

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 5

ER -