A comparison of nasendoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency

Derek J. Lam, Jacqueline R. Starr, Jonathan A. Perkins, Charlotte W. Lewis, Linda E. Eblen, Julie Dunlap, Kathleen C.Y. Sie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare nasendoscopy (NE) and multiview fluoroscopy (MVF) in assessing velopharyngeal gap size; and 2) to determine the relationship between these assessments and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) severity. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of consecutive patients with VPI at a tertiary care children's hospital, assessed with NE and MVF between 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: 177 subjects. NE and MVF gap areas were correlated (R = 0.34, 95% CI 0.26-0.41). In adjusted analysis, VPI severity was associated with: 1) NE gap area (OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.96-3.95), 2) MVF gap area (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.37-1.95), 3) age <5 years (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.47-7.38), and 4) previously repaired cleft palate (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: NE and MVF assessments provide complementary information and are correlated. Both are associated with VPI severity. However, the "bird's-eye view" provided by NE has a stronger correlation with VPI severity than MVF. EBM rating: B-2b

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-402
Number of pages9
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of nasendoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this