A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers

Part I. Reliability and validity

Sela Barker, Nancy Barron, Bentson McFarland, Douglas A. Bigelow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors describe the development, reliability testing, and validation of a 17-item instrument that measures the level of functioning of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers. The instrument provides a measure of the consumer's severity of disability which can, in turn, be used to: (a) describe an agency's "case mix" of clients; (b) measure consumer progress; (c) assign clients to different levels of service; and (d) assist payors in determining reimbursement. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is aimed specifically at persons with chronic mental illness, is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population, and is quick and easy to complete. The scale's reliability and validity have been examined in detail. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability are good. Criterion variables such as length of psychiatric hospitalization and clinicians' global ratings correlated highly with scale scores. Finally, the instrument predicts subsequent state and local hospital admissions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-383
Number of pages21
JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1994

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Mentally Ill Persons
Reproducibility of Results
Chronic Disease
mental illness
ability
community
State Hospitals
Diagnosis-Related Groups
hospitalization
Individuality
chronic illness
Psychiatry
Hospitalization
disability
rating
manager
human being
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers : Part I. Reliability and validity. / Barker, Sela; Barron, Nancy; McFarland, Bentson; Bigelow, Douglas A.

In: Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, 08.1994, p. 363-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barker, Sela ; Barron, Nancy ; McFarland, Bentson ; Bigelow, Douglas A. / A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers : Part I. Reliability and validity. In: Community Mental Health Journal. 1994 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 363-383.
@article{46f4f746eab74139a618a2aa237dfa0e,
title = "A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validity",
abstract = "The authors describe the development, reliability testing, and validation of a 17-item instrument that measures the level of functioning of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers. The instrument provides a measure of the consumer's severity of disability which can, in turn, be used to: (a) describe an agency's {"}case mix{"} of clients; (b) measure consumer progress; (c) assign clients to different levels of service; and (d) assist payors in determining reimbursement. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is aimed specifically at persons with chronic mental illness, is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population, and is quick and easy to complete. The scale's reliability and validity have been examined in detail. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability are good. Criterion variables such as length of psychiatric hospitalization and clinicians' global ratings correlated highly with scale scores. Finally, the instrument predicts subsequent state and local hospital admissions.",
author = "Sela Barker and Nancy Barron and Bentson McFarland and Bigelow, {Douglas A.}",
year = "1994",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/BF02207489",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "363--383",
journal = "Community Mental Health Journal",
issn = "0010-3853",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers

T2 - Part I. Reliability and validity

AU - Barker, Sela

AU - Barron, Nancy

AU - McFarland, Bentson

AU - Bigelow, Douglas A.

PY - 1994/8

Y1 - 1994/8

N2 - The authors describe the development, reliability testing, and validation of a 17-item instrument that measures the level of functioning of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers. The instrument provides a measure of the consumer's severity of disability which can, in turn, be used to: (a) describe an agency's "case mix" of clients; (b) measure consumer progress; (c) assign clients to different levels of service; and (d) assist payors in determining reimbursement. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is aimed specifically at persons with chronic mental illness, is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population, and is quick and easy to complete. The scale's reliability and validity have been examined in detail. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability are good. Criterion variables such as length of psychiatric hospitalization and clinicians' global ratings correlated highly with scale scores. Finally, the instrument predicts subsequent state and local hospital admissions.

AB - The authors describe the development, reliability testing, and validation of a 17-item instrument that measures the level of functioning of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers. The instrument provides a measure of the consumer's severity of disability which can, in turn, be used to: (a) describe an agency's "case mix" of clients; (b) measure consumer progress; (c) assign clients to different levels of service; and (d) assist payors in determining reimbursement. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is aimed specifically at persons with chronic mental illness, is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population, and is quick and easy to complete. The scale's reliability and validity have been examined in detail. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability are good. Criterion variables such as length of psychiatric hospitalization and clinicians' global ratings correlated highly with scale scores. Finally, the instrument predicts subsequent state and local hospital admissions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028049044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028049044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02207489

DO - 10.1007/BF02207489

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 363

EP - 383

JO - Community Mental Health Journal

JF - Community Mental Health Journal

SN - 0010-3853

IS - 4

ER -