Working with decisionally capable patients who are determined to end their own lives

Joel Yager, Linda Ganzini, Dan H. Nguyen, Erica K. Rapp

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Psychiatrists face complex, vexing, and often conflicting issues in assessing and managing patients with advanced medical illnesses who are determined to end their own lives. Substantial differences of opinion exist among psychiatrists regarding the roles they might take with such patients when the patients are decisionally capable and do not have clear-cut psychiatric disorders. Even those with psychiatric diagnoses often possess rational deliberative abilities and may make decisions to hasten death that are not impacted by their psychiatric disorder. How psychiatrists interact with these patients may be influenced by contradictory and even incompatible ethical, psychological, social, cultural, and professional biases. Tensions often exist between patients' autonomous preferences regarding their wish to die and psychiatrists' usual approaches to suicide prevention. To consider these issues, we review some ethical, legal, psychological, social, and clinical concerns; potential interventions; and support for psychiatrists caring for decisionally capable patients with advanced medical illness who wish to end their own lives. Although psychiatrists' work strongly focuses on suicide prevention, harms might result if suicide prevention becomes the only focus of treatment plans for these patients. We recast benefits and harms in such situations and make suggestions for assessing and managing such patients and for potentially offering assistance to families and other survivors. While psychiatrists should carefully think through each case on its own merits and seek consultation with experts, they should not act reflexively to prevent all deaths at any cost. We argue they may, in some cases, honor patients' and families' wishes and even collaborate with them around decisions to hasten death.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number17r11767
    JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
    Volume79
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    Psychiatry
    Suicide
    Ethical Review
    Psychology
    Aptitude
    Patient Preference
    Mental Disorders
    Survivors
    Referral and Consultation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Working with decisionally capable patients who are determined to end their own lives. / Yager, Joel; Ganzini, Linda; Nguyen, Dan H.; Rapp, Erica K.

    In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 79, No. 4, 17r11767, 01.07.2018.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{55d7aaecfc8b4b7894a644aff08e46a6,
    title = "Working with decisionally capable patients who are determined to end their own lives",
    abstract = "Psychiatrists face complex, vexing, and often conflicting issues in assessing and managing patients with advanced medical illnesses who are determined to end their own lives. Substantial differences of opinion exist among psychiatrists regarding the roles they might take with such patients when the patients are decisionally capable and do not have clear-cut psychiatric disorders. Even those with psychiatric diagnoses often possess rational deliberative abilities and may make decisions to hasten death that are not impacted by their psychiatric disorder. How psychiatrists interact with these patients may be influenced by contradictory and even incompatible ethical, psychological, social, cultural, and professional biases. Tensions often exist between patients' autonomous preferences regarding their wish to die and psychiatrists' usual approaches to suicide prevention. To consider these issues, we review some ethical, legal, psychological, social, and clinical concerns; potential interventions; and support for psychiatrists caring for decisionally capable patients with advanced medical illness who wish to end their own lives. Although psychiatrists' work strongly focuses on suicide prevention, harms might result if suicide prevention becomes the only focus of treatment plans for these patients. We recast benefits and harms in such situations and make suggestions for assessing and managing such patients and for potentially offering assistance to families and other survivors. While psychiatrists should carefully think through each case on its own merits and seek consultation with experts, they should not act reflexively to prevent all deaths at any cost. We argue they may, in some cases, honor patients' and families' wishes and even collaborate with them around decisions to hasten death.",
    author = "Joel Yager and Linda Ganzini and Nguyen, {Dan H.} and Rapp, {Erica K.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.4088/JCP.17r11767",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "79",
    journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
    issn = "0160-6689",
    publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Working with decisionally capable patients who are determined to end their own lives

    AU - Yager, Joel

    AU - Ganzini, Linda

    AU - Nguyen, Dan H.

    AU - Rapp, Erica K.

    PY - 2018/7/1

    Y1 - 2018/7/1

    N2 - Psychiatrists face complex, vexing, and often conflicting issues in assessing and managing patients with advanced medical illnesses who are determined to end their own lives. Substantial differences of opinion exist among psychiatrists regarding the roles they might take with such patients when the patients are decisionally capable and do not have clear-cut psychiatric disorders. Even those with psychiatric diagnoses often possess rational deliberative abilities and may make decisions to hasten death that are not impacted by their psychiatric disorder. How psychiatrists interact with these patients may be influenced by contradictory and even incompatible ethical, psychological, social, cultural, and professional biases. Tensions often exist between patients' autonomous preferences regarding their wish to die and psychiatrists' usual approaches to suicide prevention. To consider these issues, we review some ethical, legal, psychological, social, and clinical concerns; potential interventions; and support for psychiatrists caring for decisionally capable patients with advanced medical illness who wish to end their own lives. Although psychiatrists' work strongly focuses on suicide prevention, harms might result if suicide prevention becomes the only focus of treatment plans for these patients. We recast benefits and harms in such situations and make suggestions for assessing and managing such patients and for potentially offering assistance to families and other survivors. While psychiatrists should carefully think through each case on its own merits and seek consultation with experts, they should not act reflexively to prevent all deaths at any cost. We argue they may, in some cases, honor patients' and families' wishes and even collaborate with them around decisions to hasten death.

    AB - Psychiatrists face complex, vexing, and often conflicting issues in assessing and managing patients with advanced medical illnesses who are determined to end their own lives. Substantial differences of opinion exist among psychiatrists regarding the roles they might take with such patients when the patients are decisionally capable and do not have clear-cut psychiatric disorders. Even those with psychiatric diagnoses often possess rational deliberative abilities and may make decisions to hasten death that are not impacted by their psychiatric disorder. How psychiatrists interact with these patients may be influenced by contradictory and even incompatible ethical, psychological, social, cultural, and professional biases. Tensions often exist between patients' autonomous preferences regarding their wish to die and psychiatrists' usual approaches to suicide prevention. To consider these issues, we review some ethical, legal, psychological, social, and clinical concerns; potential interventions; and support for psychiatrists caring for decisionally capable patients with advanced medical illness who wish to end their own lives. Although psychiatrists' work strongly focuses on suicide prevention, harms might result if suicide prevention becomes the only focus of treatment plans for these patients. We recast benefits and harms in such situations and make suggestions for assessing and managing such patients and for potentially offering assistance to families and other survivors. While psychiatrists should carefully think through each case on its own merits and seek consultation with experts, they should not act reflexively to prevent all deaths at any cost. We argue they may, in some cases, honor patients' and families' wishes and even collaborate with them around decisions to hasten death.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052653858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052653858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4088/JCP.17r11767

    DO - 10.4088/JCP.17r11767

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85052653858

    VL - 79

    JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

    JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

    SN - 0160-6689

    IS - 4

    M1 - 17r11767

    ER -