TY - JOUR
T1 - Working Group Recommendations
T2 - Measuring Outcomes of Care in Geriatric Evaluation and Management Units
AU - Hedrick, Susan C.
AU - Deyo, Richard
AU - Haber, Paul
AU - James, Kenneth
AU - Metier, Jeffrey
AU - Mor, Vincent
AU - Scanlon, William
AU - Weissert, William
AU - Williams, Mark
PY - 1991/9
Y1 - 1991/9
N2 - Issues related to measuring outcomes of care in geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) units were identified by the outcomes working group of the GEM evaluation conference. GEM units have as a major goal the improvement or maintenance of both physical and psychosocial function. Suggested outcome measures for physical health included survival, restricted activity days, general health perceptions, comprehensive physical function, and miscellaneous specific types of functioning. In the area of psycho‐social function, the working group suggested measuring cognitive function, affect/life satisfaction, social function, and satisfaction with care. The patient's caregiver (eg, spouse or child) is often an important target of GEM care, and the group suggested measuring caregiver burden, life satisfaction, and assessment of patient behavior problems. While the primary goal of GEM units is to improve health status, their effects on the utilization and cost of health care are important to decisions about wide‐spread implementation and funding. The group therefore suggested a comprehensive assessment of these outcomes. Among the large array of recommended outcomes, the most important were thought to be mortality, function, and cost. 1991 The American Geriatrics Society
AB - Issues related to measuring outcomes of care in geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) units were identified by the outcomes working group of the GEM evaluation conference. GEM units have as a major goal the improvement or maintenance of both physical and psychosocial function. Suggested outcome measures for physical health included survival, restricted activity days, general health perceptions, comprehensive physical function, and miscellaneous specific types of functioning. In the area of psycho‐social function, the working group suggested measuring cognitive function, affect/life satisfaction, social function, and satisfaction with care. The patient's caregiver (eg, spouse or child) is often an important target of GEM care, and the group suggested measuring caregiver burden, life satisfaction, and assessment of patient behavior problems. While the primary goal of GEM units is to improve health status, their effects on the utilization and cost of health care are important to decisions about wide‐spread implementation and funding. The group therefore suggested a comprehensive assessment of these outcomes. Among the large array of recommended outcomes, the most important were thought to be mortality, function, and cost. 1991 The American Geriatrics Society
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026080175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026080175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05935.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05935.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 1885879
AN - SCOPUS:0026080175
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 39
SP - 48S-52S
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 1 S
ER -