Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment

Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions

Neil S. Wenger, Joanne Lynn, Robert K. Oye, Honghu Liu, Joan Teno, Russell S. Phillips, Norman A. Desbiens, Ashwini Sehgal, Peter Kussin, Harry Taub, Frank Harrell, William Knaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated prospectively the use of acute hemodialysis among hospitalized patients to identify demographic and clinical predictors of and chart documentation concerning dialysis withheld and withdrawn. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Five teaching hospitals PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-five seriously ill hospitalized patients who had not previously undergone dialysis who developed renal failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, preferences, and prognostic estimates associated with having dialysis withheld rather than initiated and withdrawn rather than continued. Differences in chart documentation concerning decision-making for dialysis withheld, withdrawn, and continued. RESULTS: Older patient age, cancer diagnosis, and male gender were associated with dialysis withheld rather than withdrawn. Age and gender differences persisted after adjustment for patients' aggressiveness of care preference. Worse 2-month prognosis was associated with both withholding and withdrawing dialysis. Chart documentation of decision-making was lacking more often for patients with dialysis withheld than for dialysis withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the equity of life-sustaining treatment use will require evaluation of care withheld, not just care withdrawn. Older patients and men, after accounting for prognosis and function, are more likely to have dialysis withheld than withdrawn after a trial. Further exploration is needed into this disparity and the inadequate chart documentation for patients with dialysis withheld.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S75-S83
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume48
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Documentation
Dialysis
Therapeutics
Decision Making
Demography
Teaching Hospitals
Renal Insufficiency
Renal Dialysis
Patient Care
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • hemodialysis
  • physician-patient relationship
  • terminal care
  • withdrawing care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment : Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions. / Wenger, Neil S.; Lynn, Joanne; Oye, Robert K.; Liu, Honghu; Teno, Joan; Phillips, Russell S.; Desbiens, Norman A.; Sehgal, Ashwini; Kussin, Peter; Taub, Harry; Harrell, Frank; Knaus, William.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 48, No. S1, 01.01.2000, p. S75-S83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wenger, NS, Lynn, J, Oye, RK, Liu, H, Teno, J, Phillips, RS, Desbiens, NA, Sehgal, A, Kussin, P, Taub, H, Harrell, F & Knaus, W 2000, 'Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions', Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 48, no. S1, pp. S75-S83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03145.x
Wenger, Neil S. ; Lynn, Joanne ; Oye, Robert K. ; Liu, Honghu ; Teno, Joan ; Phillips, Russell S. ; Desbiens, Norman A. ; Sehgal, Ashwini ; Kussin, Peter ; Taub, Harry ; Harrell, Frank ; Knaus, William. / Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment : Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2000 ; Vol. 48, No. S1. pp. S75-S83.
@article{c3013928f9d34bcbad698ed7e6199527,
title = "Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We evaluated prospectively the use of acute hemodialysis among hospitalized patients to identify demographic and clinical predictors of and chart documentation concerning dialysis withheld and withdrawn. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Five teaching hospitals PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-five seriously ill hospitalized patients who had not previously undergone dialysis who developed renal failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, preferences, and prognostic estimates associated with having dialysis withheld rather than initiated and withdrawn rather than continued. Differences in chart documentation concerning decision-making for dialysis withheld, withdrawn, and continued. RESULTS: Older patient age, cancer diagnosis, and male gender were associated with dialysis withheld rather than withdrawn. Age and gender differences persisted after adjustment for patients' aggressiveness of care preference. Worse 2-month prognosis was associated with both withholding and withdrawing dialysis. Chart documentation of decision-making was lacking more often for patients with dialysis withheld than for dialysis withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the equity of life-sustaining treatment use will require evaluation of care withheld, not just care withdrawn. Older patients and men, after accounting for prognosis and function, are more likely to have dialysis withheld than withdrawn after a trial. Further exploration is needed into this disparity and the inadequate chart documentation for patients with dialysis withheld.",
keywords = "hemodialysis, physician-patient relationship, terminal care, withdrawing care",
author = "Wenger, {Neil S.} and Joanne Lynn and Oye, {Robert K.} and Honghu Liu and Joan Teno and Phillips, {Russell S.} and Desbiens, {Norman A.} and Ashwini Sehgal and Peter Kussin and Harry Taub and Frank Harrell and William Knaus",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03145.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "S75--S83",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment

T2 - Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions

AU - Wenger, Neil S.

AU - Lynn, Joanne

AU - Oye, Robert K.

AU - Liu, Honghu

AU - Teno, Joan

AU - Phillips, Russell S.

AU - Desbiens, Norman A.

AU - Sehgal, Ashwini

AU - Kussin, Peter

AU - Taub, Harry

AU - Harrell, Frank

AU - Knaus, William

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We evaluated prospectively the use of acute hemodialysis among hospitalized patients to identify demographic and clinical predictors of and chart documentation concerning dialysis withheld and withdrawn. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Five teaching hospitals PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-five seriously ill hospitalized patients who had not previously undergone dialysis who developed renal failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, preferences, and prognostic estimates associated with having dialysis withheld rather than initiated and withdrawn rather than continued. Differences in chart documentation concerning decision-making for dialysis withheld, withdrawn, and continued. RESULTS: Older patient age, cancer diagnosis, and male gender were associated with dialysis withheld rather than withdrawn. Age and gender differences persisted after adjustment for patients' aggressiveness of care preference. Worse 2-month prognosis was associated with both withholding and withdrawing dialysis. Chart documentation of decision-making was lacking more often for patients with dialysis withheld than for dialysis withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the equity of life-sustaining treatment use will require evaluation of care withheld, not just care withdrawn. Older patients and men, after accounting for prognosis and function, are more likely to have dialysis withheld than withdrawn after a trial. Further exploration is needed into this disparity and the inadequate chart documentation for patients with dialysis withheld.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We evaluated prospectively the use of acute hemodialysis among hospitalized patients to identify demographic and clinical predictors of and chart documentation concerning dialysis withheld and withdrawn. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Five teaching hospitals PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-five seriously ill hospitalized patients who had not previously undergone dialysis who developed renal failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, preferences, and prognostic estimates associated with having dialysis withheld rather than initiated and withdrawn rather than continued. Differences in chart documentation concerning decision-making for dialysis withheld, withdrawn, and continued. RESULTS: Older patient age, cancer diagnosis, and male gender were associated with dialysis withheld rather than withdrawn. Age and gender differences persisted after adjustment for patients' aggressiveness of care preference. Worse 2-month prognosis was associated with both withholding and withdrawing dialysis. Chart documentation of decision-making was lacking more often for patients with dialysis withheld than for dialysis withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the equity of life-sustaining treatment use will require evaluation of care withheld, not just care withdrawn. Older patients and men, after accounting for prognosis and function, are more likely to have dialysis withheld than withdrawn after a trial. Further exploration is needed into this disparity and the inadequate chart documentation for patients with dialysis withheld.

KW - hemodialysis

KW - physician-patient relationship

KW - terminal care

KW - withdrawing care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034102715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034102715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03145.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03145.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - S75-S83

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - S1

ER -