TY - JOUR
T1 - "Why Is This Patient Being Sent Here?"
T2 - Communication from Urgent Care to the Emergency Department
AU - Gardner, Rebekah
AU - Choo, Esther K.
AU - Gravenstein, Stefan
AU - Baier, Rosa R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Contract Number HHSM-500-2011-RI, titled “Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review for the State of Rhode Island,” sponsored by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the US Department of Health and Human Services . CMS reviewed the manuscript and provided comments, but did not have any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or preparation or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US government. Dr. Esther Choo is supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant K23DA031881 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Background Despite patients' increasing use of urgent care centers (UCC), little is known about how urgent care clinicians communicate with the emergency department (ED). Objectives To assess ED clinicians' perceptions of the quality and consistency of communication when patients are referred from UCCs to EDs. Methods Emergency medicine department chairs distributed a brief, electronic survey to a statewide sample of ED clinicians via e-mail. The survey included multiple-choice and free-text questions focused on types of communication desired and received from UCCs, types of test results available on transfer, and suggestions for improvement. Results Of 199 ED clinicians, 102 (51.3%) responded. More than four out of five respondents "somewhat" or "strongly agreed" that each of the following would be helpful: a telephone call, the reason for referral, specific concern, a copy of the chart, and UCC contact information. However, ED clinicians reported not consistently receiving these: only a fifth (21.6%) of clinicians reported receiving the specific concern for their last 5 patients transferred from a UCC, and 34.3% recalled receiving a copy of the chart. Overall, 54.9% reported receiving laboratory test results "often or almost always," 49.0% electrocardiograms, and 44.1% imaging reports. Qualitative analysis revealed several themes: incomplete data when patients are referred; barriers to discussion between ED and urgent care clinicians; and possible solutions to improve communication. Conclusions Our findings highlight variation in communication from UCCs to EDs, indicating a need to improve communication standards and practices. We identify several potential ways to improve this clinical information hand-off.
AB - Background Despite patients' increasing use of urgent care centers (UCC), little is known about how urgent care clinicians communicate with the emergency department (ED). Objectives To assess ED clinicians' perceptions of the quality and consistency of communication when patients are referred from UCCs to EDs. Methods Emergency medicine department chairs distributed a brief, electronic survey to a statewide sample of ED clinicians via e-mail. The survey included multiple-choice and free-text questions focused on types of communication desired and received from UCCs, types of test results available on transfer, and suggestions for improvement. Results Of 199 ED clinicians, 102 (51.3%) responded. More than four out of five respondents "somewhat" or "strongly agreed" that each of the following would be helpful: a telephone call, the reason for referral, specific concern, a copy of the chart, and UCC contact information. However, ED clinicians reported not consistently receiving these: only a fifth (21.6%) of clinicians reported receiving the specific concern for their last 5 patients transferred from a UCC, and 34.3% recalled receiving a copy of the chart. Overall, 54.9% reported receiving laboratory test results "often or almost always," 49.0% electrocardiograms, and 44.1% imaging reports. Qualitative analysis revealed several themes: incomplete data when patients are referred; barriers to discussion between ED and urgent care clinicians; and possible solutions to improve communication. Conclusions Our findings highlight variation in communication from UCCs to EDs, indicating a need to improve communication standards and practices. We identify several potential ways to improve this clinical information hand-off.
KW - care transitions
KW - communication
KW - hand-offs
KW - quality improvement
KW - urgent care centers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960329552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960329552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.032
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 26281813
AN - SCOPUS:84960329552
SN - 0736-4679
VL - 50
SP - 416
EP - 421
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 3
ER -