What's in a number? Counting the african population of portland, Oregon: Methods, issues and implications for community health collaborations

Anais Tuepker, Linda Boise, Folashade Onadeko, Teresa Gipson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose-Aware that ''those who aren't counted don't count'' in health program planning, a community coalition, called African Partnership for Health, attempts a current estimate of the African community living in Portland, Oregon, USA. This paper seeks to describe the findings. Design/methodology/approach-The paper's definition of the ''African community''was crucially informed by community participation in the research process. The authors drew on existing publicly available data sources to estimate the size of the target population and identified the strengths and weaknesses of each source. Findings- Conservative estimations are of a 2010 African community population of 11,500-15,500 for the Portland metropolitan area. No data source on its own would have resulted in this estimate. Research limitations/implications-Areas for further research include creating practical systems to collect data on country of origin and to address an existing data bias towards refugees over immigrants. In the USA, more robust data collection systems are needed to estimate the impact of secondary migration on the size and characteristics of refugee and immigrant communities. Practical implications-Health program planners should be aware that existing data may include more information about some groups (refugees as opposed to immigrants) and emphasize some characteristics (race as opposed to country of origin). Originality/value- Including immigrant and refugee community members in the research process can result in more relevant definition of that community, which may lead to more effective program targeting and design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-173
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Refugees
Health
health
Population
community
refugee
Information Storage and Retrieval
immigrant
Research
country of origin
research process
Health Planning
Health Services Needs and Demand
Information Systems
health planning
program planning
coalition
agglomeration area
migration
participation

Keywords

  • African immigrants
  • African refugees
  • Census
  • Communities
  • Participatory research
  • Secondary migration
  • US immigration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

What's in a number? Counting the african population of portland, Oregon : Methods, issues and implications for community health collaborations. / Tuepker, Anais; Boise, Linda; Onadeko, Folashade; Gipson, Teresa.

In: International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2011, p. 164-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e568d3fcfe2f426da31732f27b234e88,
title = "What's in a number? Counting the african population of portland, Oregon: Methods, issues and implications for community health collaborations",
abstract = "Purpose-Aware that ''those who aren't counted don't count'' in health program planning, a community coalition, called African Partnership for Health, attempts a current estimate of the African community living in Portland, Oregon, USA. This paper seeks to describe the findings. Design/methodology/approach-The paper's definition of the ''African community''was crucially informed by community participation in the research process. The authors drew on existing publicly available data sources to estimate the size of the target population and identified the strengths and weaknesses of each source. Findings- Conservative estimations are of a 2010 African community population of 11,500-15,500 for the Portland metropolitan area. No data source on its own would have resulted in this estimate. Research limitations/implications-Areas for further research include creating practical systems to collect data on country of origin and to address an existing data bias towards refugees over immigrants. In the USA, more robust data collection systems are needed to estimate the impact of secondary migration on the size and characteristics of refugee and immigrant communities. Practical implications-Health program planners should be aware that existing data may include more information about some groups (refugees as opposed to immigrants) and emphasize some characteristics (race as opposed to country of origin). Originality/value- Including immigrant and refugee community members in the research process can result in more relevant definition of that community, which may lead to more effective program targeting and design.",
keywords = "African immigrants, African refugees, Census, Communities, Participatory research, Secondary migration, US immigration",
author = "Anais Tuepker and Linda Boise and Folashade Onadeko and Teresa Gipson",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/17479891111206292",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "164--173",
journal = "International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care",
issn = "1747-9894",
publisher = "Pier Professional Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's in a number? Counting the african population of portland, Oregon

T2 - Methods, issues and implications for community health collaborations

AU - Tuepker, Anais

AU - Boise, Linda

AU - Onadeko, Folashade

AU - Gipson, Teresa

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose-Aware that ''those who aren't counted don't count'' in health program planning, a community coalition, called African Partnership for Health, attempts a current estimate of the African community living in Portland, Oregon, USA. This paper seeks to describe the findings. Design/methodology/approach-The paper's definition of the ''African community''was crucially informed by community participation in the research process. The authors drew on existing publicly available data sources to estimate the size of the target population and identified the strengths and weaknesses of each source. Findings- Conservative estimations are of a 2010 African community population of 11,500-15,500 for the Portland metropolitan area. No data source on its own would have resulted in this estimate. Research limitations/implications-Areas for further research include creating practical systems to collect data on country of origin and to address an existing data bias towards refugees over immigrants. In the USA, more robust data collection systems are needed to estimate the impact of secondary migration on the size and characteristics of refugee and immigrant communities. Practical implications-Health program planners should be aware that existing data may include more information about some groups (refugees as opposed to immigrants) and emphasize some characteristics (race as opposed to country of origin). Originality/value- Including immigrant and refugee community members in the research process can result in more relevant definition of that community, which may lead to more effective program targeting and design.

AB - Purpose-Aware that ''those who aren't counted don't count'' in health program planning, a community coalition, called African Partnership for Health, attempts a current estimate of the African community living in Portland, Oregon, USA. This paper seeks to describe the findings. Design/methodology/approach-The paper's definition of the ''African community''was crucially informed by community participation in the research process. The authors drew on existing publicly available data sources to estimate the size of the target population and identified the strengths and weaknesses of each source. Findings- Conservative estimations are of a 2010 African community population of 11,500-15,500 for the Portland metropolitan area. No data source on its own would have resulted in this estimate. Research limitations/implications-Areas for further research include creating practical systems to collect data on country of origin and to address an existing data bias towards refugees over immigrants. In the USA, more robust data collection systems are needed to estimate the impact of secondary migration on the size and characteristics of refugee and immigrant communities. Practical implications-Health program planners should be aware that existing data may include more information about some groups (refugees as opposed to immigrants) and emphasize some characteristics (race as opposed to country of origin). Originality/value- Including immigrant and refugee community members in the research process can result in more relevant definition of that community, which may lead to more effective program targeting and design.

KW - African immigrants

KW - African refugees

KW - Census

KW - Communities

KW - Participatory research

KW - Secondary migration

KW - US immigration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857083702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857083702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/17479891111206292

DO - 10.1108/17479891111206292

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84857083702

VL - 7

SP - 164

EP - 173

JO - International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care

JF - International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care

SN - 1747-9894

IS - 4

ER -