What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper I aim to show why pediatric suffering must be understood as a judgment or evaluation, rather than a mental state. To accomplish this task, first I analyze the various ways that the label of suffering is used in pediatric practice. Out of this analysis emerge what I call the twin poles of pediatric suffering. At one pole sits the belief that infants and children with severe cognitive impairment cannot suffer because they are nonverbal or lack subjective life experience. At the other pole exists the idea that once child suffering reaches some threshold it is ethical to eliminate the sufferer. Concerningly, at both poles, any particular child vanishes from view. Second, in an attempt to identify a theory of suffering inclusive of children, I examine two prominent so-called experiential accounts of suffering. I find them both wanting on account of their absurd entailments and their flawed assumptions regarding the subjective experiences of people who cannot communicate expressively. Finally, I extend arguments found in Alastair MacIntyre’s Dependent Rational Animals to argue that child suffering can be understood only as a set of absences—absences of conditions such as love, warmth, and freedom from pain. An evaluation of these absences reveals the exquisite dependency of children. It also discloses why pediatric suffering is necessarily a social and political event. Unlike adults, children will never be either the authors or the mitigators of their own suffering. Rather, children must rely wholly on others in order to resist suffering, grow, and flourish.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-163
Number of pages21
JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Keywords

  • Disability
  • Pediatric ethics
  • Quality of life
  • Suffering
  • Withholding/withdrawing treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this